naturalplastic wrote:
I was wondering about that the other day: did they divide up the nukes between the former Soviet Republics when the USSR broke up (like some of the other Soviet assets like the navy)? Or did all the nukes go to the Russian Republic? I guess you just answered my question- the Russians got them all-even the nukes originally based in other republics like the Ukraine.
If a small to mid sized country starts to play around with a nuclear program- it has the opposite effect. It tends to INVITE the superpowers to attack you. Thats what happened with Iraq, and if Romney had been elected - we would be occupying Iran now for that reason.
But yes- if you become a solidly established nuclear power-with like 1500 warheads- the bullies probably would not bother you. And I suspect Putin might not be supporting insurgents in the Ukraine if the Ukraine still had its Soviet era nuclear warheads.
Until you actually have nukes, then you're untouchable. Giving up your weapons, seems to invite attack too.
There are a lot of states that could go nuclear if they want to, they just are under the umbrella of another nuclear state. Like Japan could become one with in 6 months to a year, Saudi Arabia could become one easily with the help Pakistan, Europe obviously as well.
If Ukraine still had nukes, it is unlikely the situation would of ever played out the way it did. Russia would of never allowed Banderas freaks to come to any power,