Page 1 of 1 [ 13 posts ] 

Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

28 Aug 2014, 7:02 am

Good news for us.



Ectryon
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jun 2014
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,241
Location: Hundred Acre Wood

30 Aug 2014, 1:53 am

Are you UKIP supporter? What's the reason for your stance?


_________________
IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ! !
My history on this forum preserves my old and unregenerate self. In the years since I posted here I have undergone many changes. I accept responsibility for my posts but I no longer stand behind them.
__________________
And He is the radiance of His glory and the exact representation of His nature, and upholds all things by the word of His power When He had made purification of sins, He sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high Hebrews 1:3


Humanaut
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,390
Location: Norway

30 Aug 2014, 2:31 am

Farage has held some great speeches at the EU Parliament.



Ectryon
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jun 2014
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,241
Location: Hundred Acre Wood

30 Aug 2014, 3:03 am

Humanaut wrote:
Farage has held some great speeches at the EU Parliament.


UKIP is a joke lol they make it impossible to take them seriously. One of their MP's called a Thai supporter a "ting tong". "Oh she's just some ting tong". She said this during an interview she knew would be recorded and distributed. Another MP actually thought it would be a good idea to recommend that students copy Hitler's oratory style. Given the nature of UKIP this wasn't the most politically sound move to make. They play on xenophobia for the most part. I do agree that immigration is out of control however. Unfortunately UKIP appear to be innately racist so its impossible to tease apart the good ideas from the xenophobic ones.


_________________
IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ! !
My history on this forum preserves my old and unregenerate self. In the years since I posted here I have undergone many changes. I accept responsibility for my posts but I no longer stand behind them.
__________________
And He is the radiance of His glory and the exact representation of His nature, and upholds all things by the word of His power When He had made purification of sins, He sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high Hebrews 1:3


Humanaut
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,390
Location: Norway

30 Aug 2014, 3:31 am

Don't be so negative. Have this.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhGNoZfvRoA[/youtube]



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

30 Aug 2014, 3:50 am

Ectryon wrote:
Humanaut wrote:
Farage has held some great speeches at the EU Parliament.


UKIP is a joke lol they make it impossible to take them seriously. One of their MP's called a Thai supporter a "ting tong". "Oh she's just some ting tong"


We only have the one MP at the moment and he's having a by-election! You mean Janice Atkinson MEP. It was a very silly thing for her to say and I don't think she'll repeat a mistake like that. If she does, she will have the UKIP whip removed from her.

Ectryon wrote:
She said this during an interview she knew would be recorded and distributed.


I'm not sure she did realise that at the moment she said it though.

Ectryon wrote:
Another MP actually thought it would be a good idea to recommend that students copy Hitler's oratory style.


No, he didn't. Bill Etheridge mentioned Hitler as one of the many great speechmakers throughout history - see also Churchill and Martin Luther King, and people like that. Not to copy Hitler, but to observe his speeches and the way - like Churchill and Luther King - that they make their presence and oratory felt.

Ectryon wrote:
They play on xenophobia for the most part.


Evidence?

Ectryon wrote:
I do agree that immigration is out of control however. Unfortunately UKIP appear to be innately racist so its impossible to tease apart the good ideas from the xenophobic ones.


What do you base that on? The demonisation of UKIP by the media?

If you're against mass immigration and want an independent Britain, you should vote for us. Or don't. :)



Ectryon
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jun 2014
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,241
Location: Hundred Acre Wood

30 Aug 2014, 6:30 am

Quote:
And members of the eurosceptic party seem to have been doing their darnedest to prove the party slogan otherwise. There is Enfield candidate William Henwood who said Lenny Henry should ?emigrate to a black country?. There is Andre Lampitt, star of Ukip's election broadcast who said Ed Miliband was Polish. Brent's Heino Vockrodt wrote in a private email that Muslims have "a totalitarian ideology" and are forcing out locals.

It is not just the grassroots where such views are being unearthed. MEP Gerard Batten, the party's immigration spokesman, believes British Muslims should sign a special code of conduct. Marine Le Pen, leader of the French Front National, was startled when Farage rejected a partnership with her party - whose founder has convictions for hate speech. She had thought their world views were closely aligned.



Quote:
None have harsher words for the Ukip leader than the party's founder, Dr Alan Sked, who called him a "dim, racist alcoholic" and alleged he used the n-word to describe potential voters. Farage strongly denied he ever used the slur.

The London School of Economics professor also repeated a claim he made in 2004 that Mr Farage had once said: ?We will never win the n****r vote.?

Sked resigned the leadership shortly after the 1997 general election, citing the growing influence of radical, far-right opinion in the party's ranks. "UKIP is even less liberal than the British National Party," Sked has said. "Certainly, there is a symbiosis between elements of the parties."


http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danho ... ist-party/

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... -of-racism

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danho ... ist-party/


_________________
IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ! !
My history on this forum preserves my old and unregenerate self. In the years since I posted here I have undergone many changes. I accept responsibility for my posts but I no longer stand behind them.
__________________
And He is the radiance of His glory and the exact representation of His nature, and upholds all things by the word of His power When He had made purification of sins, He sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high Hebrews 1:3


Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

30 Aug 2014, 1:36 pm

Oh dear, not really an attempt at a serious argument. Just link to lazy hit-pieces.

I don't take Dan Hodges that seriously with his columns.

The Sked quotes sound very much like libel. Sked hasn't had anything to do with UKIP for the best part of 20 years, and it doesn't remotely sound like the thing that Farage would say.

The bigger parties are much more able to ignore or downplay their idiots. The major parties have people in them that are ex-neo Nazis, ex-BNP members, councillors that sexually abused children, councillors that set off bombs, and so on. Do we judge them by the activities of their nutters? No? So don't make an exception for UKIP.

I wasn't happy about the Janice Atkinson thing, but I also wasn't happy with the complainant's husband who made it very public and dragged it out for longer than than necessary.

Funny story: the secretary in my branch asked a prospective member that was starting to get aggressive and that sounded dubious that we're not racist and we don't accept racism and people with serious criminal convictions - he screams back: "that's no good to me - I'm very racist!" and slams the phone down).

It is a problem, having nutters associate themselves with us - but all we can do is purge them when they are pointed out to us (or they embarass themselves), We can't pre-emptively investigate every potential member, every friend on Facebook, everyone who votes for us.

The other side of this coin, of course, is that people are human. And humans often say things in real life which are racist, sexist or bigoted or at least offensive to some person or some group. We have to strike a balance between allowing people to speak their mind and them not bringing the party into disrepute.

So, if you want no more Down's syndrome people to come into the world - that's marvellous. Not whilst representing UKIP though.



Ectryon
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jun 2014
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,241
Location: Hundred Acre Wood

30 Aug 2014, 8:35 pm

Tequila wrote:
Oh dear, not really an attempt at a serious argument. Just link to lazy hit-pieces.

I don't take Dan Hodges that seriously with his columns.

The Sked quotes sound very much like libel. Sked hasn't had anything to do with UKIP for the best part of 20 years, and it doesn't remotely sound like the thing that Farage would say.

The bigger parties are much more able to ignore or downplay their idiots. The major parties have people in them that are ex-neo Nazis, ex-BNP members, councillors that sexually abused children, councillors that set off bombs, and so on. Do we judge them by the activities of their nutters? No? So don't make an exception for UKIP.

I wasn't happy about the Janice Atkinson thing, but I also wasn't happy with the complainant's husband who made it very public and dragged it out for longer than than necessary.

Funny story: the secretary in my branch asked a prospective member that was starting to get aggressive and that sounded dubious that we're not racist and we don't accept racism and people with serious criminal convictions - he screams back: "that's no good to me - I'm very racist!" and slams the phone down).

It is a problem, having nutters associate themselves with us - but all we can do is purge them when they are pointed out to us (or they embarass themselves), We can't pre-emptively investigate every potential member, every friend on Facebook, everyone who votes for us.

The other side of this coin, of course, is that people are human. And humans often say things in real life which are racist, sexist or bigoted or at least offensive to some person or some group. We have to strike a balance between allowing people to speak their mind and them not bringing the party into disrepute.

So, if you want no more Down's syndrome people to come into the world - that's marvellous. Not whilst representing UKIP though.



Im sure that you're not a racist bigot or whatever else but the fact is that there are countless stories of UKIP representatives being caught using racist and bigoted slogans rhetoric and language. The point of the links was to illustrate just how prevalent this is. No other party has the brazen stupidity to say the sorts of things UKIP have been caught on record saying. If a labour rep were caught mid racist diatribe labour would do their utmost to separate themselves from said rep. UKIP defend the behaviour.

UKIP as a party has changed substantially. It seems that the outspoken bigotry is actually part of their strategy, perhaps to appeal to the ultra disenfranchised.

To continue to call UKIP a party which represents the interests of immigrants and natives alike is to ignore the mounting evidence otherwise


_________________
IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ! !
My history on this forum preserves my old and unregenerate self. In the years since I posted here I have undergone many changes. I accept responsibility for my posts but I no longer stand behind them.
__________________
And He is the radiance of His glory and the exact representation of His nature, and upholds all things by the word of His power When He had made purification of sins, He sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high Hebrews 1:3


Humanaut
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,390
Location: Norway

30 Aug 2014, 9:20 pm

I don't believe they're racist.

In fact, I'm having a hard time finding a clear distinction between the labour unions' arguments against so-called social dumping, and the rationale behind UKIP's immigration policies.



Ectryon
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jun 2014
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,241
Location: Hundred Acre Wood

30 Aug 2014, 9:50 pm

UKIP's policies aren't in question its the public scandals and antics which are getting them branded as racists. They know what theyre doing, this is obviously calculated. They may well not be anymore racist than the average rich white conglomeration of old Etonians but for some reason theyre not bothering to conceal it.

Their policies are perfectly reasonable


_________________
IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ! !
My history on this forum preserves my old and unregenerate self. In the years since I posted here I have undergone many changes. I accept responsibility for my posts but I no longer stand behind them.
__________________
And He is the radiance of His glory and the exact representation of His nature, and upholds all things by the word of His power When He had made purification of sins, He sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high Hebrews 1:3


Humanaut
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,390
Location: Norway

30 Aug 2014, 11:29 pm

UKIP's support has quadrupled compared to the 2010 election, and they won the 2014 EU Parliament election. Number 10 will be theirs in 2020 if the trend continues.



0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

31 Aug 2014, 2:12 am

I support UKIP on Europe, however I don't agree with many of their social policies.


I simply don't buy the these arguments. I'm a competitionist and broadly against protectionism. I do however take issue with those that seek to cause harm or destroy. I also think states that have been poor allies should not enjoy diplomatic relations. People should still apply to the immigration authorities.


Eventually immigration will be irrelevant in a lot of fields. It already is in my profession, which you can do anywhere in the world, and get clients from all over the world. Far from feeling threatened I take full advantage of both improving myself making use of the ability to subcontract jobs. It makes better at what I do, and also I couldn't stop it anyway.

"Undercutting" far from being a bad thing is actually a good thing. It makes native services better, and improves the market across the board.

Regarding culture, it is the responsibility of the people who have the culture to practice it. You can't blame other people for that without taking responsibility yourself.

Regarding benefits, economic immigration should not solicit welfare at all. It is purely for commerce. However by far the bigest group on benefit are born nationals.

Polish builders, and plumbers have been largely demonized. But has it stopped English Builders and Plumbers? Far from it. They have got better at what they do, and the less competitive ones that didn't step up have gone, which is not a bad thing.