[UK] Douglas Carswell's UKIP defection
Are you UKIP supporter? What's the reason for your stance?
_________________
IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ! !
My history on this forum preserves my old and unregenerate self. In the years since I posted here I have undergone many changes. I accept responsibility for my posts but I no longer stand behind them.
__________________
And He is the radiance of His glory and the exact representation of His nature, and upholds all things by the word of His power When He had made purification of sins, He sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high Hebrews 1:3
UKIP is a joke lol they make it impossible to take them seriously. One of their MP's called a Thai supporter a "ting tong". "Oh she's just some ting tong". She said this during an interview she knew would be recorded and distributed. Another MP actually thought it would be a good idea to recommend that students copy Hitler's oratory style. Given the nature of UKIP this wasn't the most politically sound move to make. They play on xenophobia for the most part. I do agree that immigration is out of control however. Unfortunately UKIP appear to be innately racist so its impossible to tease apart the good ideas from the xenophobic ones.
_________________
IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ! !
My history on this forum preserves my old and unregenerate self. In the years since I posted here I have undergone many changes. I accept responsibility for my posts but I no longer stand behind them.
__________________
And He is the radiance of His glory and the exact representation of His nature, and upholds all things by the word of His power When He had made purification of sins, He sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high Hebrews 1:3
UKIP is a joke lol they make it impossible to take them seriously. One of their MP's called a Thai supporter a "ting tong". "Oh she's just some ting tong"
We only have the one MP at the moment and he's having a by-election! You mean Janice Atkinson MEP. It was a very silly thing for her to say and I don't think she'll repeat a mistake like that. If she does, she will have the UKIP whip removed from her.
I'm not sure she did realise that at the moment she said it though.
No, he didn't. Bill Etheridge mentioned Hitler as one of the many great speechmakers throughout history - see also Churchill and Martin Luther King, and people like that. Not to copy Hitler, but to observe his speeches and the way - like Churchill and Luther King - that they make their presence and oratory felt.
Evidence?
What do you base that on? The demonisation of UKIP by the media?
If you're against mass immigration and want an independent Britain, you should vote for us. Or don't.
It is not just the grassroots where such views are being unearthed. MEP Gerard Batten, the party's immigration spokesman, believes British Muslims should sign a special code of conduct. Marine Le Pen, leader of the French Front National, was startled when Farage rejected a partnership with her party - whose founder has convictions for hate speech. She had thought their world views were closely aligned.
The London School of Economics professor also repeated a claim he made in 2004 that Mr Farage had once said: ?We will never win the n****r vote.?
Sked resigned the leadership shortly after the 1997 general election, citing the growing influence of radical, far-right opinion in the party's ranks. "UKIP is even less liberal than the British National Party," Sked has said. "Certainly, there is a symbiosis between elements of the parties."
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danho ... ist-party/
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... -of-racism
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danho ... ist-party/
_________________
IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ! !
My history on this forum preserves my old and unregenerate self. In the years since I posted here I have undergone many changes. I accept responsibility for my posts but I no longer stand behind them.
__________________
And He is the radiance of His glory and the exact representation of His nature, and upholds all things by the word of His power When He had made purification of sins, He sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high Hebrews 1:3
Oh dear, not really an attempt at a serious argument. Just link to lazy hit-pieces.
I don't take Dan Hodges that seriously with his columns.
The Sked quotes sound very much like libel. Sked hasn't had anything to do with UKIP for the best part of 20 years, and it doesn't remotely sound like the thing that Farage would say.
The bigger parties are much more able to ignore or downplay their idiots. The major parties have people in them that are ex-neo Nazis, ex-BNP members, councillors that sexually abused children, councillors that set off bombs, and so on. Do we judge them by the activities of their nutters? No? So don't make an exception for UKIP.
I wasn't happy about the Janice Atkinson thing, but I also wasn't happy with the complainant's husband who made it very public and dragged it out for longer than than necessary.
Funny story: the secretary in my branch asked a prospective member that was starting to get aggressive and that sounded dubious that we're not racist and we don't accept racism and people with serious criminal convictions - he screams back: "that's no good to me - I'm very racist!" and slams the phone down).
It is a problem, having nutters associate themselves with us - but all we can do is purge them when they are pointed out to us (or they embarass themselves), We can't pre-emptively investigate every potential member, every friend on Facebook, everyone who votes for us.
The other side of this coin, of course, is that people are human. And humans often say things in real life which are racist, sexist or bigoted or at least offensive to some person or some group. We have to strike a balance between allowing people to speak their mind and them not bringing the party into disrepute.
So, if you want no more Down's syndrome people to come into the world - that's marvellous. Not whilst representing UKIP though.
I don't take Dan Hodges that seriously with his columns.
The Sked quotes sound very much like libel. Sked hasn't had anything to do with UKIP for the best part of 20 years, and it doesn't remotely sound like the thing that Farage would say.
The bigger parties are much more able to ignore or downplay their idiots. The major parties have people in them that are ex-neo Nazis, ex-BNP members, councillors that sexually abused children, councillors that set off bombs, and so on. Do we judge them by the activities of their nutters? No? So don't make an exception for UKIP.
I wasn't happy about the Janice Atkinson thing, but I also wasn't happy with the complainant's husband who made it very public and dragged it out for longer than than necessary.
Funny story: the secretary in my branch asked a prospective member that was starting to get aggressive and that sounded dubious that we're not racist and we don't accept racism and people with serious criminal convictions - he screams back: "that's no good to me - I'm very racist!" and slams the phone down).
It is a problem, having nutters associate themselves with us - but all we can do is purge them when they are pointed out to us (or they embarass themselves), We can't pre-emptively investigate every potential member, every friend on Facebook, everyone who votes for us.
The other side of this coin, of course, is that people are human. And humans often say things in real life which are racist, sexist or bigoted or at least offensive to some person or some group. We have to strike a balance between allowing people to speak their mind and them not bringing the party into disrepute.
So, if you want no more Down's syndrome people to come into the world - that's marvellous. Not whilst representing UKIP though.
Im sure that you're not a racist bigot or whatever else but the fact is that there are countless stories of UKIP representatives being caught using racist and bigoted slogans rhetoric and language. The point of the links was to illustrate just how prevalent this is. No other party has the brazen stupidity to say the sorts of things UKIP have been caught on record saying. If a labour rep were caught mid racist diatribe labour would do their utmost to separate themselves from said rep. UKIP defend the behaviour.
UKIP as a party has changed substantially. It seems that the outspoken bigotry is actually part of their strategy, perhaps to appeal to the ultra disenfranchised.
To continue to call UKIP a party which represents the interests of immigrants and natives alike is to ignore the mounting evidence otherwise
_________________
IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ! !
My history on this forum preserves my old and unregenerate self. In the years since I posted here I have undergone many changes. I accept responsibility for my posts but I no longer stand behind them.
__________________
And He is the radiance of His glory and the exact representation of His nature, and upholds all things by the word of His power When He had made purification of sins, He sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high Hebrews 1:3
UKIP's policies aren't in question its the public scandals and antics which are getting them branded as racists. They know what theyre doing, this is obviously calculated. They may well not be anymore racist than the average rich white conglomeration of old Etonians but for some reason theyre not bothering to conceal it.
Their policies are perfectly reasonable
_________________
IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ! !
My history on this forum preserves my old and unregenerate self. In the years since I posted here I have undergone many changes. I accept responsibility for my posts but I no longer stand behind them.
__________________
And He is the radiance of His glory and the exact representation of His nature, and upholds all things by the word of His power When He had made purification of sins, He sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high Hebrews 1:3
I support UKIP on Europe, however I don't agree with many of their social policies.
I simply don't buy the these arguments. I'm a competitionist and broadly against protectionism. I do however take issue with those that seek to cause harm or destroy. I also think states that have been poor allies should not enjoy diplomatic relations. People should still apply to the immigration authorities.
Eventually immigration will be irrelevant in a lot of fields. It already is in my profession, which you can do anywhere in the world, and get clients from all over the world. Far from feeling threatened I take full advantage of both improving myself making use of the ability to subcontract jobs. It makes better at what I do, and also I couldn't stop it anyway.
"Undercutting" far from being a bad thing is actually a good thing. It makes native services better, and improves the market across the board.
Regarding culture, it is the responsibility of the people who have the culture to practice it. You can't blame other people for that without taking responsibility yourself.
Regarding benefits, economic immigration should not solicit welfare at all. It is purely for commerce. However by far the bigest group on benefit are born nationals.
Polish builders, and plumbers have been largely demonized. But has it stopped English Builders and Plumbers? Far from it. They have got better at what they do, and the less competitive ones that didn't step up have gone, which is not a bad thing.