Page 1 of 4 [ 54 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Tollorin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Jun 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,178
Location: Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada

06 Nov 2014, 9:29 pm

It's a two years old new, but I only learned it now.

Quote:
Knowledge-Based Education ? We oppose the teaching of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) (values
clarification), critical thinking skills and similar programs that are simply a relabeling of Outcome-Based
Education (OBE) (mastery learning) which focus on behavior modification and have the purpose of challenging
the student?s fixed beliefs and undermining parental authority.

s3.amazonaws.com/texasgop_pre/assets/original/2012Platform_Final.pdf
The url don't seem to work for some reasons.
It's on page twenty.

Seem like the republicans don't like peoples thinking for themself.



ScrewyWabbit
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Oct 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,157

18 Nov 2014, 3:28 pm

Of course. Well educated voters who can think and reason for themselves don't make good minions for unquestioningly absorbing Fox News propaganda. The large scale teaching of people how to reason and critically think is an existential threat to the Republican party, and also, not uncoincidentally, to most religions.



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

18 Nov 2014, 6:25 pm

no where in education on either side do they want to teach people to think for themselves



0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

18 Nov 2014, 7:45 pm

Politicians are against critical thinking, a huge swathes of the electorate are against critical thinking. It is not the domain of one party.

In fact the polarization without thought is a refection of that.

All I'm hearing from Capitol Hill:
"i like cupcakes"
"cupcakes are for liberals"
"no, fairy cakes are for contards"
etc, etc

It is all very unintelligent, for the most part.

Manifesto politics almost by definition lacks critical thinking, it serves as a promise. A guarantee to their supporters not to, think critically.



0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

18 Nov 2014, 7:50 pm

Jacoby wrote:
no where in education on either side do they want to teach people to think for themselves


Seriously, I mean it occasionally used to be taught literally as a "Critical Thinking" course.

Critical Thinking is often confused with being a Contrarian these days.



GoonSquad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2007
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,748
Location: International House of Paincakes...

18 Nov 2014, 7:50 pm

Jacoby wrote:
no where in education on either side do they want to teach people to think for themselves


That's not true. Higher ed is generally all about analytical thought....

And, when I went back to school, I noticed that it was something most of my younger classmates struggled with.
the problem is so bad that many professors provide hand-out on critical thinking in addition to the class syllabus.

Hell, just for fun I spent my entire time in intro to philosophy pretending to be a rabid materialist and making fun of the textbook.

My teacher never really caught on, and he would provide lengthy rebuttals to all my papers. BUT, he never marked off a single point because I 'disagreed' with him, because my arguments were mostly sound.

I've never had a teacher penalize me for 'thinking for myself' even when what I thought wasn't what they thought as long as I could show WHY I thought the thoughts I thought. :wink:

Never.

:)


_________________
No man is free who is not master of himself.~Epictetus


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,891
Location: Stendec

18 Nov 2014, 8:19 pm

ScrewyWabbit wrote:
... The large scale teaching of people how to reason and critically think is an existential threat to the Republican party, and also, not uncoincidentally, to most religions.

Anyone who has a vested interest in holding authority over others is not likely to appreciate the Power of Critical Thinking, especially when it is used against them.

Why do you think that scientists, journalists, lawyers, and other intellectuals are so despised? It's because we can cut through the bullsnot and expose the hidden truths behind the deceptions.

Why do you think that astrologers, homeopaths, evangelists, unionists, and other con artists attack anyone who can see through their "smoke and mirrors" trickery? Because we can easily dilute or eliminate their influence over their unsuspecting victims.

Why do you think that church leaders quickly learn whom to ignore and whom to suck up to? Because Critical Thinking donesn't put money in the collection plates, while gullibility, guilt, and blind faith do.


_________________
 
The previous signature line has been cancelled.


ScrewyWabbit
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Oct 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,157

19 Nov 2014, 2:32 pm

0_equals_true wrote:
It is not the domain of one party.


I respectfully disagree. One party generally is in favor of public education. The other party is against it, and constantly seeks to replace it with religiously-oriented private schools where its a good bet even less critical thinking will be taught once the subject matter is under the control of private groups.



American
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 285

21 Nov 2014, 12:59 am

Tollorin wrote:
It's a two years old new, but I only learned it now.

Quote:
Knowledge-Based Education ? We oppose the teaching of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) (values
clarification), critical thinking skills and similar programs that are simply a relabeling of Outcome-Based
Education (OBE) (mastery learning) which focus on behavior modification and have the purpose of challenging
the student?s fixed beliefs and undermining parental authority.

s3.amazonaws.com/texasgop_pre/assets/original/2012Platform_Final.pdf
The url don't seem to work for some reasons.
It's on page twenty.

Seem like the republicans don't like peoples thinking for themself.


I saw this before and disagree. Republicans would do a lot better if more people had critical thinking skills. That's not to say that the GOP are shining knights in armor ready to deliver us all to the promised land. But, compared to Democrats, Republicans will do less damage.



khaoz
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Apr 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,940

21 Nov 2014, 1:10 am

The GOP opposes thinking, period. They do not value intelligence, or integrity. They rely on the ignorance of Americans to win elections. Everything the GOP is for runs contrary to the will of majority America yet they are still able to propagandize themselves into victory in midterm elections mainly because their voting base is on the verge of extinction and easily manipulated and their propaganda has convinced the rest of the country that voting is futile. If more than even 60% of eligible voters actually showed up to vote, the GOP would be annihilated running on their policies.



khaoz
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Apr 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,940

21 Nov 2014, 1:12 am

American wrote:
Tollorin wrote:
It's a two years old new, but I only learned it now.

Quote:
Knowledge-Based Education ? We oppose the teaching of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) (values
clarification), critical thinking skills and similar programs that are simply a relabeling of Outcome-Based
Education (OBE) (mastery learning) which focus on behavior modification and have the purpose of challenging
the student?s fixed beliefs and undermining parental authority.

s3.amazonaws.com/texasgop_pre/assets/original/2012Platform_Final.pdf
The url don't seem to work for some reasons.
It's on page twenty.

Seem like the republicans don't like peoples thinking for themself.


I saw this before and disagree. Republicans would do a lot better if more people had critical thinking skills. That's not to say that the GOP are shining knights in armor ready to deliver us all to the promised land. But, compared to Democrats, Republicans will do less damage.


All the damage we are seeing in this country now is due to the GOP and the way it uses propaganda to convince Americans that the damage THEY are doing deliberately to sabotage this country is all the fault of Obama and Liberals. They can only do this because their voting base lacks ANY thinking ability.



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,571
Location: the island of defective toy santas

24 Nov 2014, 2:59 am

American wrote:
But, compared to Democrats, Republicans will do less damage.

we each see "damage" differently - denying affordable healthcare to working class people versus denying millionaires yet more exemption from taxation. there will never be agreement here.



American
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 285

24 Nov 2014, 11:49 pm

auntblabby wrote:
American wrote:
But, compared to Democrats, Republicans will do less damage.

we each see "damage" differently - denying affordable healthcare to working class people versus denying millionaires yet more exemption from taxation. there will never be agreement here.


Democrats take away choice. Obamacare, for example, denies people the right to choose certain types of health insurance policies because Obama knows best. I'm still unclear as to why Democrats think that bumbling bureaucrats in Washington D.C. are better positioned than individuals to decide which health insurance policies are best for those individuals.



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,571
Location: the island of defective toy santas

24 Nov 2014, 11:56 pm

American wrote:
Democrats take away choice. Obamacare, for example, denies people the right to choose certain types of health insurance policies because Obama knows best. I'm still unclear as to why Democrats think that bumbling bureaucrats in Washington D.C. are better positioned than individuals to decide which health insurance policies are best for those individuals.

yes, democrats rob us of the freedom to starve to death. :roll: you wanna be free to buy fake insurance, then vote GOP, if that is what makes you happy. :|



GoonSquad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2007
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,748
Location: International House of Paincakes...

24 Nov 2014, 11:58 pm

American wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
American wrote:
But, compared to Democrats, Republicans will do less damage.

we each see "damage" differently - denying affordable healthcare to working class people versus denying millionaires yet more exemption from taxation. there will never be agreement here.


Democrats take away choice. Obamacare, for example, denies people the right to choose certain types of health insurance policies because Obama knows best. I'm still unclear as to why Democrats think that bumbling bureaucrats in Washington D.C. are better positioned than individuals to decide which health insurance policies are best for those individuals.


What choice do you have when you need medical care BUT YOU CANNOT AFFORD ANY HEALTH INSURANCE?

put some of that critical thinkin' to use!


_________________
No man is free who is not master of himself.~Epictetus


American
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 285

25 Nov 2014, 12:31 am

auntblabby wrote:
American wrote:
Democrats take away choice. Obamacare, for example, denies people the right to choose certain types of health insurance policies because Obama knows best. I'm still unclear as to why Democrats think that bumbling bureaucrats in Washington D.C. are better positioned than individuals to decide which health insurance policies are best for those individuals.

yes, democrats rob us of the freedom to starve to death. :roll: you wanna be free to buy fake insurance, then vote GOP, if that is what makes you happy. :|


Obamacare banned perfectly legitimate health insurance policies. Why should people have to pay to have birth control pharmaceuticals included in their plan when they use the most effective and only free birth control--abstinence? Some people, particularly young people, may want a plan that only covers catastrophic and unanticipated health issues, not routine doctor visits. Obamacare essentially bans real health insurance. Do you also think the government should ban homeowner's insurance plans that don't cover weekly lawn mowings? While we're at it, let's ban car insurance plans that don't pay for the yearly inspection. That's the logic of Obamacare. It's absurd.