Question for libertarians and ancaps

Post Reply New Topic

Since "taxation is theft" do you opt out of using roads and police services?

If not, please therefore qualify the assertion that "taxation is theft".

I think you've taken things too literally. Taxing as a whole isn't theft, but taxing people and then using it for stupid things, and wasting what we're forced to give (which the U.S. government primarily does,) is shameful. There are also many other problems with tax abuse, that libertarians get fed up with and start feeling like it's theft.

Is it wrong to ask for a balanced budget, and want the government to stop wasting millions of dollars in tax money on things like bunny massages (yes, that exists.)?

There ARE forms of taxation that libertarians feel are unfair/unjust and want nothing to do with, and so they call those types of taxation theft. They don't mean taxation in general, because that would be ridiculous, since most libertarians are large believers in LARGE national defense budget (minus foreign interference.)

Please do your research. Maybe you can learn how libertarianism is a philosophy of different leanings (left, straight, and right) along the way, and the difference between a libertarian, Libertarian, and an anarchist as well.

Non sequitur, why would you preclude yourself from using roads and utilizing police when necessary because you do not believe that someone has to right to take your money at gunpoint? It would be more of a dilemma if your money wasn't taken and you still utilized them. It's kind of like asking well if you don't support the Iraq War, why don't move to France? I dunno, I guess because I live here and it wasn't my personal choice to go war?

funny I don't hear many complain about the gov wasting money on things but more about some of the taxed money going to welfare and how those people need to die. but apparently the gov can wast money on things like overspending then canceling the programs. o.O

At this point, I can only conclude that the OP enjoys knocking over straw, given the consistently high fiber content of his threads.

If I could opt out of taxes as well, and if opting out of the police means they don't come knocking on my door at all, so I'm free to fire my rifle and grow my little herb garden (for my home lab, seriously... ) - sure, I'll stop using government services.

Question for statists - if someone washes your car without you asking, and then steals some of your money, do you just accept it as a far trade, since you've gained some benefit from it?

The purist libertarians (and a few minarchists and anarchists) that I have met claim that infrastructure like roads should be privatized like some toll roads already are. The infrastructures themselves become the property of their owners and the owners may choose to charge a fee for use, if they wish to do so.

Others (like many minarchists and voluntarists), claim that certain infrastructure can be taxed to the citizens for short periods of time to accomplish the building of the infrastructure. This would be a little like the Bay Area counties which, in the 1930s, establish a corporation which raised extraordinary funds to build the Golden Gate Bridge and, when it was built and the expenses paid, reverted to part ownership of each county. This scheme makes large infrastructure affordable to citizens without the ongoing revenue generation for unrelated government projects.

But, me; I prefer the Golden Gate schemes. Short-term expenses which, aside from ongoing maintenance costs, are shared among those who choose to build the needed infrastructure, and then stop the extraordinary taxation.

I'm a left-libertarian, I don't see taxation as theft. Everything has a price, and the government has to get its money from SOMEWHERE. People often think that libertarian = far-right wing, but that's not necessarily the case. I'm a left-libertarian because I believe strongly in individual liberties, but recognize the need for government social programs.