Trumpism: The Ideology
A friend shared this article on G+, makes some good, and worrying points:
https://tucker.liberty.me/trumpism-the-ideology/
Jacoby
Veteran
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash
We need more "nationalists", the internationalists have been the problem all along. If we cared more about America we would of never bombed Serbia or invaded Iraq, if we didn't do that then maybe ISIS doesn't exist and Russia isn't meddling Ukraine under the Kosovo precedent. People should know the old right was explicitly non-interventionist, it wasn't until Vietnam and the birth of the new left that the antiwar voice became associated with the left. Neoconservatives were left wingers until the New Left came about and they joined the Republican party. People like the Rockefellers are the enemies of the United States and the real fascists, not Trump.
Some here may remember Ross Perot, the bourgeois billionaire and darling of the 1992 campaign. Perot was a similar type of charismatic narcissistic wannabe despot, appealing to a vanishing white middle class as a savior. But Perot got drunk on his own poll numbers (40% favorable at one time) and went further and further out on a limb until even his most diehard followers couldn't deny that he came across as batshit crazy.
He still won 19% of the vote on election day, and as a result Bill Clinton won. Clinton then pursued policies that literally created the modern far right, militias and all. The same people who now cheer Trump. Trump could easily split Jeb Bush's base, and get Hillary elected with maybe a 40-45% showing.
That is concerning because I believe that if America wakes up the morning after the election to learn that Hillary has won with 40% of the vote, that some on the radical right will take that as a green light to go to war-against the US govt. Hillary could find herself looking at the first true insurrection since 1860.
She will probably flub the response, fracturing the country and leading to a civil war similar to, say, Angola's, where a war raged for 40 years and devastated the country. Or maybe something like the wars in Sierra Leone and Liberia. The movie Blood Diamond is a very Hollywoodized look at the Sierra Leone conflict, but a good starting place. Better is to read A Long Way Gone by Ishmael Bean, a former child soldier in the SL war.
The term you were looking for there is isolationist.
Trump says he wants to "bomb the hell" out of iraqi oil fields to get back at daesh.
Says that the "right messenger" would get OPEC to lower prices for us. Which is curious because low oil prices are doing a number on domestic oil production, which was why OPEC said they increased production. They want to put the smaller US operations out of business before they can really compete.
Anyway what I'm saying is, he's a bit hawkish if what you wanted was an isolationist president.
The Trump who's emerging, of gormless battles on Twitter and elsewhere, certainly doesn't come across as bright or savvy. Unfortunately, the last few decades have made it clear that intelligence is not a requirement for being elected President.
I can't say that I find any of the other contenders inspiring either – but if Trump is the best we've got, we're doomed.
_________________
"We are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion: the stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission – which is the stage of the darkest periods of human history, the stage of rule by brute force." – Ayn Rand
I'm sure there is a GRAIN of truth to what Trump has said. Mexico has its share of problems. If you look at homicide rates for Mexico, it is rather high (although the US isn't exceptional either). So if you extrapolate that more Mexcians commit homicide more often than US born citizens and then these Mexicans move to the US we will have more homicides here (possibly). I'm not sure if this logic follows but there are real issues to be dealt with... there is a lot of crime in Mexico...
However, I think his general attitude is rather shallow and dumb. I can't think of any intelligent way to say this. I just think he is a psychopath. He simply doesn't seem like a nice man to me.
envirozentinel
Forum Moderator
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=74759_1577645873.jpg)
Joined: 16 Sep 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,031
Location: Keshron, Super-Zakhyria
He still won 19% of the vote on election day, and as a result Bill Clinton won. Clinton then pursued policies that literally created the modern far right, militias and all. The same people who now cheer Trump. Trump could easily split Jeb Bush's base, and get Hillary elected with maybe a 40-45% showing.
That is concerning because I believe that if America wakes up the morning after the election to learn that Hillary has won with 40% of the vote, that some on the radical right will take that as a green light to go to war-against the US govt. Hillary could find herself looking at the first true insurrection since 1860.
She will probably flub the response, fracturing the country and leading to a civil war similar to, say, Angola's, where a war raged for 40 years and devastated the country. Or maybe something like the wars in Sierra Leone and Liberia. The movie Blood Diamond is a very Hollywoodized look at the Sierra Leone conflict, but a good starting place. Better is to read A Long Way Gone by Ishmael Bean, a former child soldier in the SL war.
Pezar, surely the US is a vastly different country to the third world African countries you named here, which have always battled with issues such as colonialism and tribalism. The US isn't the sort of country I would associate with civil conflict as in the 1860s to occur today. As a South African I don't profess to have too much knowledge of your electoral system, although I follow it as I have an interest in election stats. Hillary is by no means perfect; far from it but surely people wouldn't respond with violence or secession on the election of the first female president?
_________________
Why is a trailer behind a car but ahead of a movie?
my blog:
https://sentinel63.wordpress.com/
Jacoby
Veteran
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash
He still won 19% of the vote on election day, and as a result Bill Clinton won. Clinton then pursued policies that literally created the modern far right, militias and all. The same people who now cheer Trump. Trump could easily split Jeb Bush's base, and get Hillary elected with maybe a 40-45% showing.
That is concerning because I believe that if America wakes up the morning after the election to learn that Hillary has won with 40% of the vote, that some on the radical right will take that as a green light to go to war-against the US govt. Hillary could find herself looking at the first true insurrection since 1860.
She will probably flub the response, fracturing the country and leading to a civil war similar to, say, Angola's, where a war raged for 40 years and devastated the country. Or maybe something like the wars in Sierra Leone and Liberia. The movie Blood Diamond is a very Hollywoodized look at the Sierra Leone conflict, but a good starting place. Better is to read A Long Way Gone by Ishmael Bean, a former child soldier in the SL war.
Perot was right about NAFTA, the mistake is being made again with TPP. We would of been much better off had Perot been president, Waco probably never happens and then OKC never happens. Perot didn't support the first Gulf War and likely wouldn't of involved us in many of the interventions of the Clinton administration. He would of destroyed the 2 party system. Look up Perot's views on certain social issues and I think you might be surprised.
Clinton was the despot and harbinger of the global New World Order but all that people remember is that the economy boomed in the 90s and they cannot connect that boom to eventually bust. Bush Sr wasn't any better on that front obviously. All these guys have egos the size of planets, guys like Trump and Perot wear it on their sleeve as opposed to the sociopathic manipulators and liars like the Clinton and Bush families.