Anti-semitism?

Post Reply New Topic

Naz Shah is a relatively new MP who was suspended for a comment she said - no one should be forced to migrate, but if the current country of Israel is more akin to Nazi Germany then people should be able to point it out surely, if only to prevent a similar incident? It always appeared to me that they deal with their neighbours with similar methods - certainly as violent, and Nazis had a similar ideal for expanding their territory. The current country of Israel is surely a rogue state within its own boundaries, and for regional extremism to stop theirs needs too...

Israel is probably more free than their patron the USA. Israel is a military state because they need to be, because everybody on the planet wants to kill them all.

If you want a rogue Nazi-like empire look no further than the USA. The USA has military bases in 100 countries, it destroys any country that dares question it, and I don't mean killing the leader I mean supporting and arming rebel groups and even invading, and in the end the whole place is rubble and the entire populace has been forced out.

At home, the slaves (ahem "citizens") are routinely harassed by militarized police forces, the USA has a quarter of the entire WORLD'S prisoners, police routinely execute slaves without a trial or any real justification, at random basically, keeping people scared and off kilter. A handful of large corporations control every aspect of life, forcing slaves to eat low quality food which is engineered to keep slaves fat and stupid, and the entire domestic media veers between jingoistic propaganda and worship of "celebrities" such as Kim Kardashian.

Slaves are in effect forbidden to travel or live outside the country. Divide and conquer is so ingrained in daily life that a person from California often fears for their safety if they travel or try to live in states like Oregon or Nevada. Even within states there is much hatred, people from L.A. can't go to Yreka in the far north without being harassed. In addition, many slaves are buying guns at a rapid clip in the belief that civil war is imminent, and they might be right.

Israel is paradise in comparison-at least they're all Jews.

She said something about Israel being moved to the USA, which I support. It can't be anti-Jewish, only anti-Israel.

The Naz Shah thing not anti-Semitism, that's a misnomer, because the Palestinians are Semites too! Semites does not only mean Jews, it's the Middle Eastern branch of peoples.

But the moral reaction is right, it's obviously racist and horrible to propose relocating a country. It's a type of Clearances, population deportation. The Chagossians show its miserable outcome. A country's identity, a people's identity except in nomadic cases, includes the land.

But the issue comes from old comments going back years. Nothing but a so-called chance radio interview she did has blown it up as an issue now. It is obviously nof chance, it is timed to damage the Labour Party in an important set of elections that are in progress right now.

Although Ken Livingston got some things wrong, he mentions historical event that did happen even if it broke down.

I found it odd that on LBC he was asked to "apologise for mentioning Hilter".

So by that logic shouldn't the interviewer apologise for mention Hitler too. Or was it mentioning Hitler and Jews together, in that case how do you discuss the history?

This kind of logic is at home with SJWs.

There is some politicing in the mayoral election, and Ken is prone to foot in mouth moments.

I have never understood "sharing a platform with" idea either. You can go to an event where somebody appears, where you were no aware of the background of everyone there.

The problem is the public lap up this rather silly logic, which is why it is used in politics. It is effective especially close to an election, where it not possible in the time to expose the the absurdity.

Ken shoudl really know better, and does have a simplistic view on the middle east like many people.