gingerpickles wrote:
In the legend of faith, they were told do not, well originally Adam was. Adam seemed quite able to follow instructions (name the beasts , etc), when singular with no other influence (peer pressure) he did not even entertain the notion of disobedience. This seems to have gone for some time since there was not yet decay of "aging". Though I will point out that God seemed to have actually physically visited but never says with what frequency.
With addition of Eve there seemed no trouble but when adding a third voice that claimed to be in the know and painted them as duped victims, they succumbed and the next visit went poorly as we all know.
The whole thing seemed a test, or testament of obedience
Why else have some dumb tree you can't touch. Like having a pyrocatha tree in middle of back yard and telling your kids to stay away because it is poison but they reason "birds eat the berries, they must be delicious". We do not go into long discussion of right or wrong or all the things that happen if they eat it. Children do not know right or wrong until they have a few years under their belt. We get their obedience through trust and authority.
We tell them not to. (Of course experienced parents just cut the tree down before they are walking age).
And we have been failing tests ever since. Finally we got reprieve through Christ. (this applies if Christian)
edit add: Curse you insert key!
This biblical story of Adam and Eve has always interested me, I remember a priest once spoke of Adam and Eve during a Sunday sermon, I wonder why God punished Adam and Eve when they could not distinguish right from wrong, before they ate the forbidden fruit.
I believing Christian, but this is bit unfair.
But after all we was redempted by sacrifice of Jesus Christ.