Julie Bindel strikes again

Page 1 of 2 [ 30 posts ] Go to page 1, 2 Next

Joined: 26 Jan 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 274
Location: Toronto, Canada

16 Aug 2016, 10:08 am

one year earlier she advocated putting men in concentration camp. one year later exactly 12 months later she confessed what she felt for years wanting the genocide of men as a gender.

I tweeted an org she co-founded Women for Justice located in the U.K i ask themif they will condemn Julie for hr call to put men in concentration camps. they never replied to me

_________________
http://theothermccain.com/category/feminism/sex-trouble/

Robert Stacy McCain's sex trouble series

Campin_Cat
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2014
Age: 63
Gender: Female
Posts: 25,953
Location: Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.

16 Aug 2016, 10:25 am

Good Heavens!! I hate that there are people out there that think / say ALL people of a certain group, are a certain way----that's terribly poisonous, not only to themselves, but others. Matter-of-fact, I think what's worse than her HAVING this attitude, are the thousands of women who "follow" her.

Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

16 Aug 2016, 2:46 pm

You folks do realize that she's obviously being sarcastic, right?

_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez

Alexanderplatz
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 28 Feb 2015
Posts: 1,524
Location: Chester Britain

16 Aug 2016, 3:08 pm

I'm amusing myself by imagining what would happen if Milo Yiannopoulos posted something equally as vile.

adifferentname
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 21 Jan 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,885

16 Aug 2016, 3:22 pm

Dox47 wrote:

You folks do realize that she's obviously being sarcastic, right?

I wouldn't be so certain. Seems par for the course for Bindel.

Lukeda420
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 31 Jul 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,640
Location: Chicago suburbs.

16 Aug 2016, 3:50 pm

adifferentname wrote:

Dox47 wrote:

You folks do realize that she's obviously being sarcastic, right?

I wouldn't be so certain. Seems par for the course for Bindel.

Why would she direct it at trolls then? That header kind of screams sarcasm.

sephardic-male
Toucan
Toucan

Joined: 26 Jan 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 274
Location: Toronto, Canada

16 Aug 2016, 4:36 pm

Dox47 wrote:

You folks do realize that she's obviously being sarcastic, right?

there is nothing sarcastic about calls for male genocide. men making "sexist" and "rape" have thir lives and reputation destroyed. the same ones that claim calls for male genocide as satire and sarcasm are the same ones that get butthurt over harmless jokes

_________________
http://theothermccain.com/category/feminism/sex-trouble/

Robert Stacy McCain's sex trouble series

Alexanderplatz
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 28 Feb 2015
Posts: 1,524
Location: Chester Britain

16 Aug 2016, 4:45 pm

As a defender of freedom of speech I have no worries over Bindel's right to post deluded, hate fuelled inflammatory ass wipe - she isn't instructing people to commit drive by shootings for instance. I do have worries over what would happen to some of those who would reply to her with a similar sense of satire.

Alexanderplatz
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 28 Feb 2015
Posts: 1,524
Location: Chester Britain

16 Aug 2016, 4:48 pm

Can't stop thinking about Derek and Clive Live now - you have to laugh.

adifferentname
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 21 Jan 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,885

16 Aug 2016, 5:22 pm

Lukeda420 wrote:

adifferentname wrote:

Dox47 wrote:

You folks do realize that she's obviously being sarcastic, right?

I wouldn't be so certain. Seems par for the course for Bindel.

Why would she direct it at trolls then? That header kind of screams sarcasm.

Why are you assuming she's addressing trolls just because she labels them as such?

Lukeda420
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 31 Jul 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,640
Location: Chicago suburbs.

16 Aug 2016, 6:06 pm

adifferentname wrote:

Lukeda420 wrote:

adifferentname wrote:

Dox47 wrote:

You folks do realize that she's obviously being sarcastic, right?

I wouldn't be so certain. Seems par for the course for Bindel.

Why would she direct it at trolls then? That header kind of screams sarcasm.

Why are you assuming she's addressing trolls just because she labels them as such?

Well that question kind of answers itself.

adifferentname
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 21 Jan 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,885

16 Aug 2016, 6:43 pm

Lukeda420 wrote:

adifferentname wrote:

Lukeda420 wrote:

adifferentname wrote:

Dox47 wrote:

You folks do realize that she's obviously being sarcastic, right?

I wouldn't be so certain. Seems par for the course for Bindel.

Why would she direct it at trolls then? That header kind of screams sarcasm.

Why are you assuming she's addressing trolls just because she labels them as such?

Well that question kind of answers itself.

Only if I make assumptions about your capacity for critical thought.

Lukeda420
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 31 Jul 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,640
Location: Chicago suburbs.

16 Aug 2016, 8:06 pm

adifferentname wrote:

Lukeda420 wrote:

adifferentname wrote:

Lukeda420 wrote:

adifferentname wrote:

Dox47 wrote:

You folks do realize that she's obviously being sarcastic, right?

I wouldn't be so certain. Seems par for the course for Bindel.

Why would she direct it at trolls then? That header kind of screams sarcasm.

Why are you assuming she's addressing trolls just because she labels them as such?

Well that question kind of answers itself.

Only if I make assumptions about your capacity for critical thought.

Why are you trying to force an argument over nothing? And why are you being so rude about it?

adifferentname
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 21 Jan 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,885

16 Aug 2016, 8:32 pm

Lukeda420 wrote:

Why are you trying to force an argument over nothing? And why are you being so rude about it?

You seem to have forgotten who initiated this dialogue.

I responded to the question which you directed at my post with a question of my own, which you then answered with a circumvention. My response to your evasion was to make a reasonable observation. Any argument thus far is taking place entirely within your own imagination.

As for "being so rude". I can only assume that, upon consideration of my observation, you've found yourself wanting in the critical thinking department. If so, that categorisation is entirely of your own volition.

I'll ask again. Why are you making the assumption that anyone whom Bindel (herself a demonstrable troll) labels a troll is a troll?

Lukeda420
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 31 Jul 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,640
Location: Chicago suburbs.

16 Aug 2016, 8:54 pm

adifferentname wrote:

Lukeda420 wrote:

Why are you trying to force an argument over nothing? And why are you being so rude about it?

Ok since this seems to be lost on you I'll explain my comment. When someone directs a comment at who they think are trolls (rightly or wrongly, it doesn't matter) then posts something so obviously ridiculous it's pretty clear they are being sarcastic. And yes she is trying to troll the the trolls. It's not uncommon.

Just so you know, I don't know who that person is and I don't really care.

adifferentname
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 21 Jan 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,885

16 Aug 2016, 9:33 pm

Lukeda420 wrote:

Ok since this seems to be lost on you I'll explain my comment.

Irony, thy name is Lukeda.

Quote:

When someone directs a comment at who they think are trolls (rightly or wrongly, it doesn't matter) then posts something so obviously ridiculous it's pretty clear they are being sarcastic.

Now you're assuming she thinks they're trolls rather than e.g. labelling them such in order to pre-emptively dismiss them, which has clearly worked at least once as it's informing your second assumption that Julie Bindel is being insincere. Considering that this is the same woman who has previously stated her desire to eradicate heterosexuality and place all men into concentration camps - which she has since confirmed to be entirely candid and unironic - I would consider that to be something of an error.

Quote:

And yes she is trying to troll the the trolls. It's not uncommon.

You have not established that her targets were "trolls". Rather, it appears to be yet another typical provocative challenge to her many detractors.

Quote:

Just so you know, I don't know who that person is and I don't really care.

You cared enough to respond to my post, but I can respect your admission of ignorance in this matter.

Page 1 of 2 [ 30 posts ] Go to page 1, 2 Next

Jump to:

Julie Bindel strikes again Post Reply New Topic

Julie Bindel strikes again