MaxE wrote:
The_Walrus wrote:
I wouldn't call a 1 in 3 chance a "near certainty". It should never have got to this stage but probability is still just about in Clinton's favour. We should be asking whether Clinton can win Arizona, Alaska, and Georgia, but instead we're asking whether Trump can win New Hampshire, Nevada, and North Carolina.
A 1 in 3 chance is effectively a toss-up. In my experience, close Presidential races are always won by Republicans. The electoral system favors Republicans in ways that don't seem to be reflected by the polls. The only "recent" exception I can think of is Kennedy vs. Nixon, which Kennedy may have won due to election fraud.
Trump has an excellent chance of winning, which may under the circumstances mean that his victory is, in fact, likely.
It depends how you define "close". 2012 was close in the national polls, but Obama won the electoral college comfortably. Jimmy Carter beat Gerald Ford in a close race. The only Republican to win a close race in that time is Dubya. I don't find this "close" category especially meaningful, but it looks like Democrats do slightly better in them than Republicans.
1 in 3 is a good chance considering (it's surely much better than some of the disastrous campaigns in the mid 20th century) but it is still a long way from "near certainty" or even "likely".
There's about a 1 in 4 chance of Trump winning the popular vote, and a 1 in 10 chance of Clinton winning the popular vote but losing the electoral college.