The article seems to be talking more about the democratic party, and privileged white liberals...I know the type they already have a nice house, maybe their parents are helping whatever so they try to vote 'good' but when it comes to things that they think could affect their 'comfort' they aren't so willing to jump on board. For instance I suspect some of those liberals in my state are against a bill that could make it onto the ballet, which will give homeless people the right to rest. Because sure they think homeless people need help, but if it means they might actually have to see homeless people 'resting' near their community they aren't so comfortable with it. But granted the people promoting this bill are also liberals, but not the same kind of liberals that would vote no.
The conclusion of the article states:
While many Trump supporters and other white conservatives who hold similar ideals will explicitly oppose efforts to make society more racially equal and inclusive, many white liberals show more implicit biases that can harm efforts to achieve these goals. This does not mean that both sides are equally guilty when it comes to stalling such efforts, but it means that many of the people ostensibly fighting for anti-racist policies have some introspection to do. An ally is only as useful as their investment in the cause.
And I agree with that conclusion.
_________________
We won't go back.