Michael Bennet is probably the candidate who is closest to me. Like me, he has no chance of becoming President this year.
The other candidates I was enthusiastic about were Kamala Harris, Cory Booker, and Kirsten Gillibrand. All have dropped out and were sensible to do so.
There is a large group I consider broadly acceptable. Patrick, Steyer, Klobuchar, and Bloomberg are the survivors of this group. However, while they are more electable than Bennet, it looks like none of them have the ability to win the nomination any more.
Andrew Yang deserves a special mention. On policies he’d probably be my second choice after Bennet, but I don’t think he has the essential personal qualities that a President needs, including his complete lack of political experience and his suspect views on race. I’m also concerned that his generalised support for “autism treatments” will probably translate to ABA. He often uses his autistic child as a prop, which firstly I wish he wouldn’t do (his child has a right to privacy) and secondly is disappointing because his autism policies fall well short of Hillary Clinton. Don’t say “I have an autistic kid”, set out your vision!
There are two candidates I would be happy to see in the White House who still have a realistic chance. They are Joe Biden and Pete Buttigieg. I think Buttigieg has two big weaknesses: his lack of experience, and his alienation of the black population of South Bend which seems to have impacted his wider appeal to black voters. I get the impression he wouldn’t have run if Ted Cruz was President.
Joe Biden, well, it all goes without saying. He’d be an excellent president and he has a broad coalition of support. My concerns are his age, and his tendency to make mistakes when speaking from the cuff.
Then there are two candidates who I would still prefer to Trump but it would mean I spent months holding my nose and biting my tongue.
Bernie Sanders is far too left-wing for my tastes. He has also made several populist attacks on freedom (his dismissal of open borders as “a Koch brothers proposal” was particularly nauseating). But on some issues, he takes bold positions that I agree with. Although he’s anti-immigration, he is also anti-deportation. I think that would probably be a viable stepping stone to the US returning to an open-borders policy, even though it is plainly incoherent in itself. Sanders also supports expansion of franchise for felons and prisoners, which is a key issue.
Elizabeth Warren has tried to market herself as “Bernie if he wasn’t an idiot”. Unfortunately this has led to her keeping his rubbish economic policies (abolishing private healthcare, free college for millionaires) but not the radical social positions which unite some socialists with liberals and libertarians.
Then there’s Tulsi Gabbard. A truly disgusting individual who cuddles up to dictators and has a long history of anti-LGBT statements. She has the worst of Sanders’ economics and the worst of Trump’s conscience. If she won the nomination it would be as devastating to the Democratic Party as Trump’s nomination was for the Republican Party, and would represent the total hollowing out of American democracy. Supporting Gabbard would be just a case of supporting “the blue team” and would be just as morally unconscionable as Republicans sticking by Trump because he’s “on the red team”. Fortunately, Gabbard’s refusal to impeach Trump has destroyed her already-low support with Democrats.