UncleBeer wrote:
[No. He was charged with "misdemeanor disorderly conduct", not soliciting.
And read the police report again. He was assumed to be fishing for sex simply because he'd put his bag in front of the bathroom door, and because he was tapping his foot (in response to the policeman's tapping).
Again, I'm not advocating hypocrisy; merely that the law and its application make sense to the average person. That didn't happen here.
Well it sure makes complete sense to me.
Misdemeanor disorderly conduct, OK, you're right. After all, he is a Senator and they have to go by the strict letter of the same laws he himself helped implement. But, for all intents and purposes, we all know what it means. It's just under general legal jargon. Clearly, you know very little about bathroom cruising. As a gay man, I can tell you unequivocally and without hesitation that his behaviour is EXACTLY what men do to ask for some form of sex in a public bathroom. And the police who are trained to regognize all the approptiate signals, and have been doing this for years, also know this. Come on , be real here, you don't have to be a behavioural expert to grasp this: you don't stare at someone who's inside a stall, for TWO minutes (why don't you count two minutes on your watch, and imagine you're peering into someone else's stall, you'll get a better picture of what's going on), then decide to go sit in the stall next to him when it becomes available, then block your door with your bag (which is a known tactict to hide the goings on), then put your foot all the way over in the other person's stall and tap it in response to an initial tapping (another known cruising tactict), then make all this sign language and put your hand under the separation and gesture to the man in the other stall, unless you want to engage in some kind of behaviour that has nothing to do with using the restroom to piss or to take a crap. Any gay man recognizes this as being a clear signal that the guy wants some action.
Oh, and wait wait wait, he actually pleaded GUILTY to these charges.
It's not like he's a poor immigrant who can't speak English, or that he doesn't understand the law and what's going on and is being framed. He waited almost two months to enter his guilty plea, so he had plenty of time to think it over.
Again, I personnally disagree with the laws which make this behaviour "disorderly conduct". But hey, wait a minute here, if you're resposible for making it illegal to cruise public bathrooms, and if you're actively promoting all this anti gay stuff, and go around crusading against gay marriage and against further protection of gays in cases of hate crimes, etc..., and, after being caught red handed, you finally must admit to engaging in a "misdemeanor disorderly conduct" with another man in a public bathroom, I call that disgusting hypocrisy.
If this were an openly gay Senator, or anyone not invovled in anti gay "reform", I would feel sorry for them, and think this law is ridiculous anyway, that we should let people live and cruise wherever they want to, but since Craig is the one who so vehemently supports such laws, I say prosecute him to the full extent of the laws he helped pass.