calandale wrote:
Surprise surprise. In a forum dominated by atheists, all but the default option mention
God, presumably as some singular creator (even excluding the pantheists among us).
You are welcome to read it in the plural. It doesn't change my argument.
calandale wrote:
And gee, "I believe something else" comes out WAY on top.
That option is not relevant to what I would like to know, and is there only for the sake of completeness.
My intention was to get comments from those who believe in a just god and that there is a single true faith. I think these two beliefs can only be logically consistent if there is a rational way to identify that faith. I have never heard of a rational method of identifying the one true faith, but about half the population of the planet believes in a just god who insists on being worshipped in just one specific way and that anyone who doesn't is in trouble. So either I missed the rational method, or lots of people believe something that is logically inconsistent, or my argument is flawed. I am open to all these possibilities. If people believe something that is logically inconsistent, I would like to understand why. None of the people who voted for one of the first two options have yet written anything, so I have no new information.
calandale wrote:
IF I believed, 'twould be an unjust God, and no single true faith.
That would be a logically consistent belief. An unjust god might do anything, including permitting multiple faiths. But I don't know whether it would help living according to one of the thrue faiths if god is unjust (turn into plural as appropriate).
_________________
They looked at one another in incomprehension, two minds driving opposite ways up a narrow street and waiting for the other man to reverse first.