Tequila wrote:
puddingmouse wrote:
Even if you did ensure that you gave all those rights to prostitutes, you would still have an illegal arm of the industry, as you get in Amsterdam.
Then you, erm, clamp down on the illegal arm of the industry!
The people who really want the industry to be exploitative are those that want it in the cupboard, as something dirty and seedy and dangerous for all women involved in it for whatever reason IMO.
Some of those aren't just social conservatives, some of those are the punters. I think it's taboo to mention the punters as anything other than innocent purchasers of the service. The illegal arm of the industry wouldn't
exist if there wasn't a demand for women/girls/boys who are forced into it.
Quote:
Just because cigarettes are legal in the UK doesn't mean that there isn't an illegal industry (increasingly so now, due to the neo-prohibitionists and the insane taxes on cigarettes, making illegal activity very profitable). The best way ahead is to make the practice as open, as free and as non-stigmiatised as possible (for both parties), whilst punishing those involved in illegal activities and exploitation.
I agree in theory, but in practice, very little will change unless we actually address the demand side of things.
_________________
Zombies, zombies will tear us apart...again.