Bill Clinton, how cool is he really?

Post Reply New Topic

This is a post to expose the former president everyone thinks was so "cool", such a "man of the people". The man who also tried to ban assault rifles being sold legally in the US (though that is an unrelated incident to what I'm about to expose).

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 5164255089

My post is an expose on the 'expose' of Bill Clinton.

As I was saying, Bill isn't so nice either, he's just what people like to call a "playa". Meaning he's smooth, stylish, charismatic, slick, and cunning, so people actually believe he's for the people. WRONG! And neither is Hillary. They built an empire on drug money, and that's not the only thing the link exposed... What about the 14 yr old girl he de-virginized and got hooked on coke?
What about the ban on assault rifles? Reguardless if your afraid of guns, we're safer with them than without them. The 2nd amendment is the guardian of all our other rights in the bill of rights.

So lets see, within the past 2 days I have exposed Bush, Kerry, and both the Clintons. Do you see it? It's not about a label, it's about the urgency of our current situation. People need to unite, not divide. It's not about the D's and R's, it's about the F (freedom).

Just ask Monica Lewinsky how cool he is. You don't get to give the highest man in the country a hummer without there being some form of 'cool' attached to him. I mean, blowing off the leader of the free world..... How much higher could you get?

He tried to establish a new radical truth. He publicly announced early in his campaign trail that he smoked pot (but didn't inhale), and almost got away with being honest about the Lewinsky scandal except he was going to be impeached (so he had to choose his words wisely).

And when i mean a new radical truth, i mean being alone and having faults and coming to the front of the issue without fear of persecution. Now i realize that the previous sentence is sort of a hypocratic verse, but when you think about it deeply, Bill was the first in office to get in trouble for the things he said and did. Why are the Clintons always being picked on? Bush should have been out of office for pergury too, but we have cretins in control now.

Bush and Kerry (one more time)

http://youtube.com/watch?v=9pUogbYkoHc

http://youtube.com/watch?v=LGqAGuw23CM

There never was a real ban on 'assault rifles' - whatever they are. The biggest effect I saw was a temporary ban on the import/production of large capacity magazines, which a) never made a difference because there were so many available to start with that they were available throughout the 'ban', and b) the law has expired. When it was in effect, simply by changing a folding stock to a fixed stock, or removing the bayonet, many 'assault' rifles become 'non-assault' rifles. It didn't decrease the volume of sales for semi-automatic rifles at all. To the contrary, Clinton and his pretense of outlawing assault rifles did more to whip up hysteria and help sell guns than any other president. Sorry we had to fool all you conservatives, but there was inventory to move.

I had a hard time not breaking into frequent laughter when going to gun shows in the late 90's and early 00s - so many people there with conspiracy theories about how Bill wanted to take away all the guns, round up people into FEMA concentration camps, etc etc.

Bill was dishonest, but he shouldn't have been given so much heat for having an affair. He isn't a Skull and Crossbones member, either.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=1etgsNU46s4

http://youtube.com/watch?v=pSQFySxzznw

Clinton just stated there that he thinks we need a "New World Order"

He plays the saxophone.

..... It seems pointless though, in a way, so many people choose not to know, even when proof is staring them in the face. The NWO laughs at those sheep, those are who they call the "profane". Theyr in the dark because they choose to be in the dark. No amount of proof can change their mind, because their mind is made up by emotions, no logic. The NWO loves the profane, they love to hate the profane, they love those who follow them. Because they fall for all the traps.
Do you understand that many of you have had the logic and critical part of your brain systematically removed by television, the education system, the church, when it comes to questioning leaders?
I am submitting PROOF that our politicians are filthy, that they want to take us over. This has happened before in history, in Germany, Russia, Cuba, China, Iraq, Iran, throughout time. Yet, despite the proof I provide, some people will still think that theyr sooooooooooo cosmically special and that they are sooooooooooo important to the universe that it could never happen to them.
If a haggardly nomad walked up to these people and offered them grand truth, it would go in one ear and out the other. Yet, a celebrity or a politician can spout off any incoherent non-since and people will fall all over it like gospel.
It is not what is said to those people, it is who says it to them. Many are more concerned with their group identity in political labels than the truth. And even those who try to break the wing divide are not fully broken away from it, theyr still not able to see where the issues lay and many times defend an extremist left or right wing position on an individual topic that ends up working towards the NWO goals. This is because they are profane. Most people are profane. Many here are profane.
It is a documented FACT that Prescott Bush funded and financed Adolf Hitler from Chase Manhattan Bank.

Mtv is a tool of the establishment to dummy people down and turn them into zombies. So is much of reality TV. TV, music, all the mainstream stuff is pre-packaged by the corporate media. They decide who gets over, they decide what artistic messages get sent through such avenues now.

The entertainment industry is a big part of it, to indoctrinate, Hitler and Stalin did this too.

snake321, I agree.

Many politicians are corrupt bastards who need to be lynched. I only support one political party over the other whilst there remains no viable alternative to the Illuminati scumbags.

Ron Paul, he's more of a centrist, a libertarian sort of, but he's running on the Republican ticket.

Do you people understand that this "conspiracy theory" is not a theory anymore? It's not a theory, it's a fact. There is a world of evidence here now.