ascan wrote:
Postperson wrote:
...I'm not keen on overmoderation, I think it has been a problem here in the past.
It has been for sure. Things are just fine now. It's unfortunate that a bunch of control-obsessed do-gooders want to change that.
That's really rotten to imply. The complaints I have received have been from people who feel intimidated to post or who feel unfairly targeted. I haven't had one message from a power-hungry monster.
I think "overmoderation" is a meaningless buzz word designed to instill fear in the rest of the members and bend them to your will. Seems a bit control-obsessed to resort to those kinds of tactics. If you describe your concerns in a less sensational manner, I'll understand them better.
Besides that, talk of "overmoderation" skews the poll results. It wasn't one of the suggestions. We're talking about potentially warning/redirecting people who say things like "You are a stupid lunatic," and holding them to a higher standard of behavior, not raiding your homes at gunpoint.
_________________
The machine does not isolate man from the great problems of nature but plunges him more deeply into them. -Antoine de Saint Exupéry