Ok, I am curious about the backgrounds with which people are addressing economic questions and I am curious if any trends can be noted. This poll will have 3 basic options(free marketeer, centrist, interventionist)
Free marketeers are people who believe that markets work relatively well without intervention, and this category can include people who are consider themselves significantly pro-market such as some conservatives, down to minarchists and anarcho-capitalists.
Centrists are people who want a more mixed economy than the free-marketeer, but still want the capitalistic market to play a very significant role in coordinating the economy. This means that they will promote some levels of welfare and some regulations, but otherwise think that capitalistic markets work reasonably well.
Interventionists are people who want the government to intervene more in markets and often think that capitalistic markets will often deviate strongly from improving welfare if not checked with strong regulatory power, or that capitalistic markets are not a decent solution for organizing the economy. This can include populists, and pretty strong left wingers all the way down to socialists, or traditional anarchists(who really screw up any labeling attempt by being so stridently different than the rest of the anti-market groups, but who I hope will forgive my bad terminology)
Also, as for the categories of education on economics, I will try to include 4 groups: those with at least a minor in economics(a minor being a cut-off as it is relatively significant), those who have taken at least one college economics class(test credit counts), those who have taken economics at the high school level, and those with no formal economics background at all. I apologize if this is to constricting, but other backgrounds can be harder to quantify.