Evolution and the age of the earth (civilised debate)

Page 1 of 5 [ 80 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Greyhound
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Apr 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,191
Location: Birmingham, UK

30 Sep 2008, 1:20 pm

I want to start a discussion thread to discuss and debate whether the theory of evolution is correct or not and the origins and age of the earth, but I'm afraid people will start being agressive in their presentation of opinions and start attacking members rather than just presenting facts.

Do you think it would be okay to start a debate on this topic? It would not be for debating the existence of God.


_________________
I don't have Aspergers, I'm just socially inept

Dodgy circuitry! Diagnosed: Tourette syndrome. Suspected: auditory processing disorder, synaesthesia. Also: social and organisation problems. Heteroromantic asexual (though still exploring)


Last edited by Greyhound on 01 Oct 2008, 3:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 98
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

30 Sep 2008, 1:50 pm

Since the archeological evidence and the DNA evidence and the current observed changes and novel species overwhelmingly indicates the truth of evolution and the only opposition is from religious sectors I wonder how you can keep God out of it.



anna-banana
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Aug 2008
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,682
Location: Europe

30 Sep 2008, 2:10 pm

the moment you get creationists into the conversation there will be no escaping the "Bible" argument so I guess it's kinda pointless if you want to have a meaningful discussion on the subject...


_________________
not a bug - a feature.


ascan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2005
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,194
Location: Taunton/Aberdeen

30 Sep 2008, 2:21 pm

anna-banana wrote:
the moment you get creationists into the conversation...

And as this forum is dominated by Yanks, there are plenty of them about. Although considering recent events over there, I expect most are busy praying for a miracle.



ToadOfSteel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,157
Location: New Jersey

30 Sep 2008, 2:28 pm

anna-banana wrote:
the moment you get creationists into the conversation there will be no escaping the "Bible" argument so I guess it's kinda pointless if you want to have a meaningful discussion on the subject...


Except not all christians are creationists. Most mainline churches understand that the book of Genesis (most of the books of the Bible, in fact) are written in parable or story form. The beliefs concerning creation of all the Abrahamic religions can be reconciled with scientific findings if one keeps an open mind... unfortunately, most extremists on both sides don't keep an open mind, and as such, arguments such as the flame wars found around here show up...



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,800
Location: Stendec

30 Sep 2008, 2:30 pm

ascan wrote:
anna-banana wrote:
the moment you get creationists into the conversation...

And as this forum is dominated by Yanks, there are plenty of them about. Although considering recent events over there, I expect most are busy praying for a miracle.

Don't paint all of us Yanks with the same dirty brush, especially one that could also be used to paint Limeys as homeopathy-obsessed, ghost-hunting, tarot-reading, Spencer-worshipping nutters!

(Back on topic)

Besides, how does it matter how we arrived at our present state of existance? Does it really matter whether we were formed from clay, evolved from slime, or constructed from graveyard leftovers?

We're here, right now, so what shall we do about it?


_________________
 
I have no love for Hamas, Hezbollah, Iranian Leadership, Islamic Jihad, other Islamic terrorist groups, OR their supporters and sympathizers.


spudnik
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Feb 2008
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,992
Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada

30 Sep 2008, 2:35 pm

ascan wrote:
anna-banana wrote:
the moment you get creationists into the conversation...

And as this forum is dominated by Yanks, there are plenty of them about. Although considering recent events over there, I expect most are busy praying for a miracle.

I don't think pointing out Yanks is fair, there are quite a few here who are not creationists and there seems to be alot of atheists and agnostics from the States on WP.



ascan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2005
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,194
Location: Taunton/Aberdeen

30 Sep 2008, 2:53 pm

Fnord wrote:
Don't paint all of us Yanks with the same dirty brush...

Wouldn't dream of it, Fnord. 55% coverage will do just fine:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/11/22/opinion/polls/main657083.shtml



anna-banana
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Aug 2008
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,682
Location: Europe

30 Sep 2008, 2:58 pm

ToadOfSteel wrote:

Except not all christians are creationists.


yeah, but almost all creationists are Christians. at least on this forum.


_________________
not a bug - a feature.


monty
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Sep 2007
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,741

30 Sep 2008, 4:46 pm

Greyhound wrote:
I want to start a discussion thread to discuss and debate whether the theory of evolution is correct or not and the origins and age of the earth, but I'm afraid people will start being agressive in their presentation of opinions and start attacking members rather than just presenting facts.

Do you think it would be okay to start a debate on this topic? It would not be for debating the existence of God.


You mentioned 'facts.' If you have scientific information about the age of the Earth or the origin of species, then that can be discussed scientifically. If you attempt to bend the scientific evidence to support theories that are driven by non-scientific paradigms, then you will probably rile up the scientists.



Greyhound
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Apr 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,191
Location: Birmingham, UK

30 Sep 2008, 5:10 pm

I see the immature insults have already started. It's a pity really. I wanted a good stimulating debate, but I see I'm probably wasting my time in trying. I did manage a very good debate on another forum which I've since left (for an unrelated reason). All but one of the people who joined in were civil and logical in presenting facts to argue their views without taking it to a personal level. What I did was try to show in what ways the evidence for evolution and determining the age of the earth were incomplete. I did not argue for God or creationism. My aim was to show the faults and gaps in the theories. It worked really well. It was me and someone else (but mainly me) against the rest of the debators. It was hard work but very stimulating and interesting. I see that sadly it's not to be the same here.


_________________
I don't have Aspergers, I'm just socially inept

Dodgy circuitry! Diagnosed: Tourette syndrome. Suspected: auditory processing disorder, synaesthesia. Also: social and organisation problems. Heteroromantic asexual (though still exploring)


AspE
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,114

30 Sep 2008, 5:12 pm

OK, how is the evidence for evolution "incomplete"?



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,800
Location: Stendec

30 Sep 2008, 5:41 pm

AspE wrote:
OK, how is the evidence for evolution "incomplete"?

Uhh ... the 'Missing Link' perhaps?

Seriously, there are gaps in the fossil record of all species, but this does not invalidate the Theory of Evolution.


_________________
 
I have no love for Hamas, Hezbollah, Iranian Leadership, Islamic Jihad, other Islamic terrorist groups, OR their supporters and sympathizers.


AspE
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,114

30 Sep 2008, 5:58 pm

I can't debate someone who agrees with me!



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

30 Sep 2008, 8:21 pm

Fnord wrote:
AspE wrote:
OK, how is the evidence for evolution "incomplete"?

Uhh ... the 'Missing Link' perhaps?

Seriously, there are gaps in the fossil record of all species, but this does not invalidate the Theory of Evolution.

There are tons of gaps in our knowledge; always will be. That doesn't disprove a theory, it just means we don't know everything there is to know.

But based on what evidence we have available to look at, evolution is, thus far, the theory that best explains our observations.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


twoshots
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,731
Location: Boötes void

30 Sep 2008, 8:41 pm

ascan wrote:
anna-banana wrote:
the moment you get creationists into the conversation...

And as this forum is dominated by Yanks, there are plenty of them about. Although considering recent events over there, I expect most are busy praying for a miracle.

American != Yankee. I'll thank you to not use the term.

A "Yankee" is someone who comes from the North to visit the South.

A "damn Yankee" buys a house and stays.


A more interesting question is... is the theory of evolution falsifiable?

And, go.


_________________
* here for the nachos.