ToadOfSteel wrote:
I developed faith because, from my experience, human logic will never be able to describe the nature of the universe, and what caused it to come into existence.
I think that I agree with this, and in fact that was the only plausible ( to me) reason/argument given for faith in the wiki page about it.
I am interested by your saying that you "developed faith". What do you mean by that?
I "decided" to believe in god 10 months ago as a result of reading about two things; the evolution of fluid-intelligence in humans which looks for patterns and creates meaning, ( and which may in many people result in a real need for belief in a "first cause", so that don't spend the whole time trying desperately to figure out what absolutely everything means, which can be exhausting) , and about emergence, consciousness etc.
That data, in combination with belief in god, contributed to my realising that contra-causal free-will is an illusion.
But I was wondering whether "faith" in general is similarly dependent on data, just that it is invisible, forgotten, or buried data. Is faith "logical", a perfectly sensible/reasonable response to data, ( however partial or superceded), which have at some point received, or is it something that one can induce with certain approaches, irrespective of information received?
I was just looking up "faith and neuroscience" and there is a lot of research going on in the area, but nothing answered my question, mainly because it was mostly about purely religious faith.
.