16-year-old Calista Springer, of Centreville, Michigan, died of smoke inhalation Wednesday when a fire broke out in her house. According to the Kalamazoo Gazette, March 1, 2008, the girl was found dead, tightly chained around her waist with a dog chain to her bed. The parents said they started using the chain to keep her from escaping at night. because she was a "special needs" child with emotional problems. They claimed they had an alarm system in place that would alert them to her movements but it stopped working days before the fire. However, when police tested it, it worked just fine. Moreover, one of the officers present at the scene said that he firmly believed she had been tethered in such a manner for several days.
Now prosecutors are going to have to make the "painful decision of whether this rises to the level of abuse."! Huh? According to the Gazette, "There is no rule in Michigan that expressly prohibits confining a child by chaining him or her." Furthermore, the Gazette quoted investigator Stacie Bladen as saying "If you're using physical restraints, such as locks on a child's bedroom door, or certainly any kind of wrapping of a child, or confining of a child, or bolting down a child, that does need to be only on the advice of the child's doctor, pediatrician, therapist, somebody that is saying that is an appropriate response." Had Springer been under foster care, the law would have provided more protection because "foster care licensing does not allow any type of restraint." Regular parents, however, are given much more leeway because they "have rights to bring their children up."
Isn't this incredible? That they even have to decide whether this is abuse? How many people think the Springers will be let off the hook in this case "because they were trying to do the best for their daughter?"
See [email protected]