Page 2 of 3 [ 33 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Xelebes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,631
Location: Edmonton, Alberta

22 Jan 2009, 1:04 pm

"The Mongrel Awards"



-
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 16 Sep 2006
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 416
Location: Untied States

22 Jan 2009, 2:23 pm

"The Foghorn"?



Ragtime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2006
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,927
Location: Dallas, Texas

22 Jan 2009, 3:48 pm

Does anyone besides me think that Sean Hannity means well?

I think he's got his own perspective just like everyone else, but that he at least means well,
whereas many people do not. Good intentions score high in my book. Bad intentions, low.
And I think that's a sensible way to look at people.


_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.


MADDuck
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 823
Location: Mid-Mo

22 Jan 2009, 4:26 pm

By means well, I agree.

He thinks that God loves The Republican Party, and Jesus put GWB in charge of America, because America is the greatest country God ever created on this Earth.

So yes, as a diluted American/white/Jesus supremacist who sees the world through 'fundamentalist dogma' glasses. Where it's either my/Jesus' way or the highway, yes he does mean well.


Show me in the Bible where it says it's okay to screw the poor, and it's okay to be rich on the backs of others!


_________________
Pain and pleasure are the twins who slowly out of focus spin around us until we finally realize, that everything that gives us pleasure also gives us pain to measure it by!


Ragtime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2006
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,927
Location: Dallas, Texas

22 Jan 2009, 5:59 pm

MADDuck wrote:
Show me in the Bible where it says it's okay to screw the poor, and it's okay to be rich on the backs of others!


I seem to have forgotten that passage... :wink:


_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.


Xelebes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,631
Location: Edmonton, Alberta

22 Jan 2009, 6:44 pm

Ragtime wrote:
Does anyone besides me think that Sean Hannity means well?

I think he's got his own perspective just like everyone else, but that he at least means well,
whereas many people do not. Good intentions score high in my book. Bad intentions, low.
And I think that's a sensible way to look at people.


His perspective is not the problem, as I've said before. It's the medium and form which it is allowed to broadcast. The form encourages one-sidedness and our-side-versus-them. But I guess it's encouraged somehow.



pakled
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Nov 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,015

22 Jan 2009, 11:26 pm

The first time I saw Fox news (back during the Invasion), I swear my first thought was 'I thought they'd canceled Sliders'...;)

I've listened to Hannity once or twice (mainly during NPR pledge drives...;) but he does have a mindset...it doesn't register as much as his sponsor, who cooks steaks at 1,800 degress (why? Are they making pottery as well?...;)

You can usually peg these sort of guys, and figure what their take on any position will be...it's like a laundry list.



kxmode
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 14 Oct 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,613
Location: In your neighborhood, knocking on your door. :)

22 Jan 2009, 11:54 pm

history_of_psychiatry wrote:
I think it's so funny that Fox News' slogan is "fair and balanced" because it is the most biased news station I've ever come across. Whenever they have a guest on the channel who has a view that is at all different than what Hannity or O'reilly says, he or she is insulted and attacked mercilessly. O'reilly is especially notorious for this. He has numerous times told his guests to shut up, insulted them, and cut their mike for no reason other than the guest says something that O'reilly disagrees with.


What you're describing is Neuro-linguistic programming.

"Neuro-linguistic programming (or NLP) is a controversial interpersonal communication model applied in psychotherapy and other contexts of communication and change. It was initially co-created by Richard Bandler and linguist John Grinder in the 1970s based on the communication and behavioral patterns acquired from gestalt therapist Fritz Perls, family systems therapist Virginia Satir and psychiatrist Milton H. Erickson. The originators emphasize modeling of excellence as the core methodology of NLP, that is, the methods they used to imitate and produce the models of exceptional communicators. They also claim that the basic assumptions of NLP draw from aspects of neurology ("neuro-"), transformational grammar ("linguistics") and cybernetics ("programming"). It has often been promoted as an art and science of effective communication and defined as 'the study of the structure of subjective experience'. Others put more emphasis on the tools, techniques and applications specific to contexts such as psychotherapy, business management and communications training, motivational seminars, personal development, and teaching."

Here's a sample of an interview between Hannity and that other guy with a Professor who has a differing point of view. Some of what the voiceover is translating sounds a tad out there but most of it seems spot on.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTIw7FEg85E[/youtube]
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqRlG2XLNKw[/youtube]
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6mA_29sd6g[/youtube]


_________________
A Proud Witness of Jehovah God (JW.org)
Revelation 21:4 "And [God] will wipe out every tear from their eyes,
and death will be no more, neither will mourning nor outcry nor pain be anymore.
The former things have passed away."


Last edited by kxmode on 22 Jan 2009, 11:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.

kxmode
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 14 Oct 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,613
Location: In your neighborhood, knocking on your door. :)

22 Jan 2009, 11:56 pm

Bea wrote:
Someone should start handing out an annual award to "The Most Obnoxious and Close-Minded Radio Host in the US"
What would be a good name for that award?


The Chickenhawk Award


_________________
A Proud Witness of Jehovah God (JW.org)
Revelation 21:4 "And [God] will wipe out every tear from their eyes,
and death will be no more, neither will mourning nor outcry nor pain be anymore.
The former things have passed away."


Averick
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Mar 2007
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,709
Location: My tower upon the crag. Yes, mwahahaha!

23 Jan 2009, 12:43 am

Xelebes wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Does anyone besides me think that Sean Hannity means well?

I think he's got his own perspective just like everyone else, but that he at least means well,
whereas many people do not. Good intentions score high in my book. Bad intentions, low.
And I think that's a sensible way to look at people.


His perspective is not the problem, as I've said before. It's the medium and form which it is allowed to broadcast. The form encourages one-sidedness and our-side-versus-them. But I guess it's encouraged somehow.


I don't think so... He was hand picked to play the part. He is an anti-semantic, a racist, a homophobe. Alan Combs was his only redeeming quality, and he ran away because Hannity was an idiot who would never listen.



t0
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2008
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 726
Location: The 4 Corners of the 4th Dimension

23 Jan 2009, 2:27 pm

Xelebes wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Does anyone besides me think that Sean Hannity means well?

I think he's got his own perspective just like everyone else, but that he at least means well,
whereas many people do not. Good intentions score high in my book. Bad intentions, low.
And I think that's a sensible way to look at people.


His perspective is not the problem, as I've said before. It's the medium and form which it is allowed to broadcast. The form encourages one-sidedness and our-side-versus-them. But I guess it's encouraged somehow.


I think it's worse than this. You end up with moderators at each extreme. Neither side is willing to compromise. So you end up advertising to the country that there are only two really extreme solutions to any problem. This is part of the reason that America is so divided - we're not being given a spectrum of solutions.



Xelebes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,631
Location: Edmonton, Alberta

23 Jan 2009, 3:27 pm

t0 wrote:
Xelebes wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Does anyone besides me think that Sean Hannity means well?

I think he's got his own perspective just like everyone else, but that he at least means well,
whereas many people do not. Good intentions score high in my book. Bad intentions, low.
And I think that's a sensible way to look at people.


His perspective is not the problem, as I've said before. It's the medium and form which it is allowed to broadcast. The form encourages one-sidedness and our-side-versus-them. But I guess it's encouraged somehow.


I think it's worse than this. You end up with moderators at each extreme. Neither side is willing to compromise. So you end up advertising to the country that there are only two really extreme solutions to any problem. This is part of the reason that America is so divided - we're not being given a spectrum of solutions.


And that is exactly what I'm implying.



Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

23 Jan 2009, 4:07 pm

Many people seem to forget that Hannity isn't doing his radio show out of the goodness of his heart, he's running a business like any other. It's all about stocking the "product" that his customers want to buy, and in his case they want the dirt of Obama. He's hardly unique in this, I mean to hear the liberal media go on about W was just as negative if not more so than anything that's ever come out of Hannity's mouth.


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


protest_the_hero
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Nov 2008
Age: 186
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,011

23 Jan 2009, 4:10 pm

The punk band NOFX gives an honorable mention of Sean Hannity in their song "You're Wrong". It says ur wrong if u agree with Sean Hannity.



oscuria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,748

23 Jan 2009, 10:16 pm

Hannity is a radio/television personality. He is not in his position to make friends or to make people happy. He is in that position to make money. Simple.

About not finding anything good to say, well I personally dont like Obama, don't care for him, but he's the president...so like with Bush I'm still behind him because of that. I just think that people overhype him to messiah status.


MADDuck wrote:
Show me in the Bible where it says it's okay to screw the poor, and it's okay to be rich on the backs of others!


Parable of Talents??

:shrug:


I try to absorb what that parable is trying to say but I always get a different meaning from the traditional.


_________________
sticks and stones may kill you.


kxmode
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 14 Oct 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,613
Location: In your neighborhood, knocking on your door. :)

24 Jan 2009, 3:24 am

Dox47 wrote:
Many people seem to forget that Hannity isn't doing his radio show out of the goodness of his heart, he's running a business like any other.


People also forget the man makes a ton of money. So naturally his prism of politics is bent towards hording all that dough of his. Anytime he says something you should hear "mine! mine! mine! me me me mine! me."


_________________
A Proud Witness of Jehovah God (JW.org)
Revelation 21:4 "And [God] will wipe out every tear from their eyes,
and death will be no more, neither will mourning nor outcry nor pain be anymore.
The former things have passed away."