Man sentanced to prison for throwing kittens in the fire

Page 3 of 4 [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

17 Nov 2006, 6:24 pm

Scintillate wrote:
I don't understand it.

Can someone help me understand why we, mankind, find joy in others pain?



sadism?



Kahazidhea
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 9 Nov 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 306

17 Nov 2006, 6:36 pm

Scintillate wrote:
I don't understand it.

Can someone help me understand why we, mankind, find joy in others pain?


That's completely wrong! Not all of mankind takes pleasure in inflicting pain upon others. I think you're just trying to sound philisophical. :roll:



TheMachine1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,011
Location: 9099 will be my last post...what the hell 9011 will be.

17 Nov 2006, 6:45 pm

Yeah people who make animals suffer tend to make people suffer to so I agree with
the people saying this ba$tard should get a very harsh prison term. Most tough
guys in prison want give a d*mn about what that guy did but there will be a few
(extremely dangerous few) that might just hold a pillow to that guys face while singing
Mama's going to buy this baby a mocking bird.



en_una_isla
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,876

17 Nov 2006, 10:49 pm

kevv729 wrote:
en_una_isla wrote:
What's the difference between throwing kittens in the fire and boiling lobsters alive?
We make one food the others pets.


But which one would taste better? :?: :?



werbert
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 May 2006
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,069

17 Nov 2006, 10:50 pm

en_una_isla wrote:
kevv729 wrote:
en_una_isla wrote:
What's the difference between throwing kittens in the fire and boiling lobsters alive?
We make one food the others pets.


But which one would taste better? :?: :?

I wouldn't know. I've eaten lobster but I've never eaten p****.


_________________
Still looking for my antidiluvian baby


Kahazidhea
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 9 Nov 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 306

17 Nov 2006, 10:52 pm

werbert wrote:
en_una_isla wrote:
kevv729 wrote:
en_una_isla wrote:
What's the difference between throwing kittens in the fire and boiling lobsters alive?
We make one food the others pets.


But which one would taste better? :?: :?

I wouldn't know. I've eaten lobster but I've never eaten p****.


p**** is a delecious delicacy, especially when you put whipped cream or sauce on it. :P It's also good with sa



willow
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Nov 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 509
Location: florida

19 Nov 2006, 6:41 pm

that doesn't quite seem a long enough sentence. I mean, I have been mad enough to want to punch someone in the head...daydream how I whip them....never...NEVER...would it occur to me to try to "hurt" someone by hurting an animal they treasured.

so calculated and cruel....ugh. not long enough, by far.


_________________
Hey little sister what have you done?
Hey little sister who?s the only one?


BazzaMcKenzie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,495
Location: the Antipodes

19 Nov 2006, 10:48 pm

hale_bopp wrote:
en_una_isla wrote:
What's the difference between throwing kittens in the fire and boiling lobsters alive?

Nothing. I'm totally against that too.

I thought the accepted practice now was to but lobster into fresh water, where they die/suffocate quickly (they need sea water) and then boil them.

Although I must admit to liking fresh water crays and yabbies cooked by the river bank over a camp fire. These are dropped in live, but I believe death is almost instant. In any event, they taste good. :lol:

TM1 wrote:
in prison there will be a few (extremely dangerous few) that might just hold a pillow to that guys face while singing
Mama's going to buy this baby a mocking bird.

You mean bite the pillow and squeal like a pig?

I think (hope) he will get a tough time in prison. :twisted:


_________________
I just dropped in to see what condition my condition was in.
Strewth!


lol
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 3 Oct 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 25
Location: Le Grand Guignol

21 Nov 2006, 11:45 pm

werbert wrote:
en_una_isla wrote:
What's the difference between throwing kittens in the fire and boiling lobsters alive?

Lobsters are delicious.


It's because of people like you that they don't serve lobsters in prison anymore.



janicka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,911
Location: Mountain Paradise

22 Nov 2006, 12:05 pm

en_una_isla wrote:
What's the difference between throwing kittens in the fire and boiling lobsters alive?


I don't think that lobsters have as sophisticated nerves as kittens and people do. Even so, I can't bear the idea of throwing live lobsters into boiling water. There's actually a way to take a large butcher knife and slice through all 7 (I think) of their nerve centers (they have those instead of a brain) so they are not alive when you boil them. It takes quite a bit of skill, as I understand it. I've never done it myself, but I definitely would if I were to boil a lobster. It seems no less humane than chopping a chicken's head off.

Anyway, I think that this guy should have received a lot more prison time than he did. I don't understand why the law treats living things (dogs, cats, etc.) like property instead of living things. Surely a car doesn't feel pain if you slash its tires or key it but it seems to be treated as a more serious crime than torturing kitties since the financial cost is worse. Treating it like a property crime is idiotic, though, because it doesn't take into account that only a really sick sociopath could do something like this.



dbzgirl
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 22 Jul 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 309

23 Nov 2006, 11:40 pm

Paula wrote:
He should have recieved a much longer sentence.


I agree!



dbzgirl
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 22 Jul 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 309

23 Nov 2006, 11:40 pm

CockneyRebel wrote:
Guys like that make me sick. :x


Me too!



violet_yoshi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Aug 2004
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,297

24 Nov 2006, 12:40 am

Well, while I'm surprised to be seeing a news story, that would usually appear only at dailyrotten.com here. I say the guy should get life. Here's how I got there. (It's what Glenn Beck says all the time when he has an opinon :wink:) Most people know that people abuse animals, most likely, will graduate to abusing humans. So theoretically, if we let this guy out, he won't be killing kittens next time, he'll be killing someone. So someone needs to be murdered, when we already have a clear sign that this sicko's on the primrose path to becoming a murderer?

I don't understand it. Unfortunetly people see killing animals as lesser than killing a human being. I think it's on the same level, of killing someone's child. Maybe it's an Aspie vs NT perception of things.


_________________
"Sprinkle, sprinkle, little bar, what I wonder is a cat" - Cheese from Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends


BazzaMcKenzie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,495
Location: the Antipodes

24 Nov 2006, 1:06 am

violet_yoshi wrote:
Most people know that people who abuse animals, most likely, will graduate to abusing humans. ...

I don't understand it. Unfortunetly people see killing animals as lesser than killing a human being. I think it's on the same level, of killing someone's child.

First, I think my child is a bit more important than someone's pet rabbit.

Second, I don't know that the evidence on abusing animals then graduating to people is not biased.


_________________
I just dropped in to see what condition my condition was in.
Strewth!


TheMachine1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,011
Location: 9099 will be my last post...what the hell 9011 will be.

24 Nov 2006, 2:12 am

BazzaMcKenzie wrote:
violet_yoshi wrote:
Most people know that people who abuse animals, most likely, will graduate to abusing humans. ...

I don't understand it. Unfortunetly people see killing animals as lesser than killing a human being. I think it's on the same level, of killing someone's child.

First, I think my child is a bit more important than someone's pet rabbit.

Second, I don't know that the evidence on abusing animals then graduating to people is not biased.


Well we have define abuse. Hunting ,population managaement, eating meat is not abuse. Killing animals in a fashion that is slow or painfull is wrong. Bleeding to dead
is painless they say. This guy came into the place I worked with a massive wound
on his arm. He broke up a dog fight and his own dog bit him so he shot the dog in rage.
He told me he felt bad and wish he had not shot him. Anyway I did not feel the need to call the police or think this guy was dangerious to the public. But throwing a cat
in a fire to cause the cat to suffer and to make your girl friend suffer is the kinda guy who could kill a human in the future. Lets judge each case on its on it own.



lion42
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jan 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 34

28 Nov 2006, 3:29 pm

If he could do that to four innocent little creatures, he deserves one hell of a long jail sentence.