cancer cure? for real? Burzynski.

Post Reply New Topic

i copied this from another forum. the video is neat. it even shows one scientist from the NCI (i think that's what it's called. the national cancer institute.) saying they purposely rig studies for non patentable stuff to fail IIRC.

apparently it's about twice as effective, has cured certain cancers that have never been cured any other way, and has few light side effects.

if the links don't work please look them up and post them.




Everyone who knows someone with cancer or has cancer must see this!! No ifs, ands or buts.

This is the most important documentary you will ever have seen.



http://www.burzynskimovie.com/



Watch the full movie here on YouTube for free:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H0ibsoqj ... re=related



From the website:



ABOUT THE FILM:

Burzynski, the Movie is the story of a medical doctor and Ph.D biochemist named Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski who won the largest, and possibly the most convoluted and intriguing legal battle against the Food & Drug Administration in American history.

His victorious battles with the United States government were centered around Dr. Burzynski's gene-targeted cancer medicines he discovered in the 1970's called Antineoplastons, which have currently completed Phase II FDA-supervised clinical trials in 2009 and could begin the final phase of FDA testing in 2011–barring the ability to raise the required $300 million to fund the final phase of FDA clinical trials.

When Antineoplastons are approved, it will mark the first time in history a single scientist, not a pharmaceutical company, will hold the exclusive patent and distribution rights on a paradigm-shifting medical breakthrough.

Antineoplastons are responsible for curing some of the most incurable forms of terminal cancer. Various cancer survivors are presented in the film who chose these medicines instead of surgery, chemotherapy or radiation - with full disclosure of medical records to support their diagnosis and recovery - as well as systematic (non-anecdotal) FDA-supervised clinical trial data comparing Antineoplastons to other available treatments—which is published within the peer-reviewed medical literature.

One form of cancer - diffuse, intrinsic, childhood brainstem glioma has never before been cured in any scientifically controlled clinical trial in the history of medicine. Antineoplastons hold the first cures in history - dozens of them. [ANP - PubMed 2003] [ANP - PubMed 2006] [Rad & other - PubMed 2008] [Chemo/Rad - PubMed 2005]

This documentarytakes the audience through the treacherous, yet victorious, 14-year journey both Dr. Burzynski and his patients have had to endure in order to obtain FDA-approved clinical trials of Antineoplastons.

Dr. Burzynski resides and practices medicine in Houston, Texas. He was able to initially produce and administer his discovery without FDA-approval from 1977-1995 because the state of Texas at this time did not require that Texas physicians be required to adhere to Federal law in this situation. This law has since been changed.

As with anything that changes current-day paradigms, Burzynski's ability to successfully treat incurable cancer with such consistency has baffled the industry. Ironically, this fact had prompted numerous investigations by the Texas Medical Board, who relentlessly took Dr. Burzynski as high as the state supreme court in their failed attempt to halt his practices.

Likewise, the Food and Drug Administration engaged in four Federal Grand Juries spanning over a decade attempting to indict Dr. Burzynski, all of which ended in no finding of fault on his behalf. Finally, Dr. Burzynski was indicted in their 5th Grand Jury in 1995, resulting in two federal trials and two sets of jurors finding him not guilty of any wrongdoing. If convicted, Dr. Burzynski would have faced a maximum of 290 years in a federal prison and $18.5 million in fines.

However, what was revealed a few years after Dr. Burzynski won his freedom, helps to paint a more coherent picture regarding the true motivation of the United States government's relentless persecution of Stanislaw Burzynski, M.D., Ph.D.

Note: When Antineoplastons are approved for public use, it will allow a single scientist to hold an exclusive right to manufacture and sell these medicines on the open market—leaving the pharmaceutical industry absent in profiting from the most effective gene-targeted cancer treatment the world has ever seen.

Yup, its for real. Its great to see someone on here that has actually bothered to watch it all the way through. I was told about this documentary over a year ago when I was chattin to Ben McLeish. This documentary is STRONGLY recommended by myself and TZM. It really is a powerful indictment of the monetary system. As long as we have money, brilliant men like Burzynski will ALWAYS be held back. I recently made a thread on here about this called "Cancer has been cured. But will the ecomony allow it?"

I saw the same thing earlier on my main Runescape forum, and it reminded me of that phrase in the bible, about at the end of days the dead will walk the Earth...

http://runescape.salmoneus.net/forums/i ... pic=351681

And the specific post is here:

http://runescape.salmoneus.net/forums/i ... 0&start=0#

(By the way, I am Chef Ramsay in that forum but you can tell it is me by the name in my side profile )

This particular development is new to me, but what this thread is talking about is a completely different treatment. Antineoplastons are not "serial killer cells", they're peptides that the healthy cancer free human body produces in abundance. Dr. Burzynski has found that introducing these peptides has a cataclysmic epigenetic effect on all cancers treated.

Under the capitalist sun, there is nothing sacred. Must get round to watching "Who Killed the Electric Car?" which i think follows a similar premise to this doc. I must admit a few years back this doc would have made my blood boil, but alas as the years pass by, all I can muster is a resigned shrug of the shoulders.

I couldn't agree more with your first statement. That's one of the reasons why I advocate the move out of the capitalist system into one that enables us to take care of all humanity. "Who Killed the Electric Car" is certainly a very insightful watch. Luckily certain activist organisations and pressures have enabled electric car tech to emerge once again.

Why did you used to have such an extreme emotional reaction against someone like Burzynski? if you don't mind me asking.

North Korea is well out of the orbit of capitalist systems. How is humanity doing there?

ruveyn

*facepalm*

You REALLY don't pay attention, do you? And even when you quote me on such a phrase, you conveniently ignore that I quantified the statement with

into one that enables us to take care of all humanity.

Yea, if you spend less time being beligerent you would notice key phrases such as this. You know you're actually very quickly convincing me that you're actually seeking out my posts so you can jump in and make an infantile comment. You're rapidly moving into troll teritory. And I don't have time for such creatures anymore.

Screw "all of humanity". We should take care of ourselves, first and foremost.

ruveyn

Wow. What a wonderfully caring mentality you have.

Just because I called you out on a logical fallacy, doesn't mean you should be aggressive. Seriously, its counter-productive and does nothing but create more animosity. You should get help.

Now I can understand your compulsion to only care about your immediate human bretheren, in a system of money, there's no way whatsoever to provide for all humanity. Its unfeasible to feed, clothe educate everyone on the planet coz it costs to much money. HOWEVER, why should we let that hold us back? We have the technology, the technical capability, the brainpower, the manpower, the altruism, the innovation, the feasibility to feed, clothe educate, and provide a high standard of living for every person on the planet.

But we don't have the money?

Don't you see how ret*d such a concept is? So we can do all of this stuff, but we're held back by an ethereal paper invention? Wow, we really need to take this middle-man known as money out of the equation so we can actually PROVIDE for all humanity, don't we? The following video should illustrate this well:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30FNVNk3_zE[/youtube]

However I can understand why this is a step you are fearful to make. As far as your concerned, the monetary paradigm is all you know, and its evident from your responses how uncomfortable it is for you to consider how we can live well without the need for money. So thus you are trapped in your bubble of your fixed frame of reference, and attack anything that calls into question the construction of the paradigm you know and love. so I can understand why the only alternative therefore is to only care about the survival of a very small number of people.

Can you even call yourself human and not care? Thing is, you don't seem to realise that all humanity is ourselves. Isn't that strange? Yea, I know, its weird to consider another human being as yourself, because we're all human beings. Regardless of where on this planet we're born. We're all the same under our skin and what you're saying is tantamount to racism. Distances and geography are irrelevant technicalities. Does that mean if you have family in another country, then you hope that they die just so you can live? Stop being so ridiculous.. You are obviously ignorant of all the things that come from other countries, like resources and plants and foods that enable life. Without them, then we would die. That's what I'm talking about in part when I say that we're all connected on this planet symbiotically. If you wish to live on your own and not care, then get the hell out of the way of those who do care. Stop trolling me and accept that your life will clearly amount to nothing in terms of the goodness that you obviously can't give unless you drop this facade of acrimony. Maybe you should talk to a competant therapist about this. It really isn't healthy. Putting a limited number on the people you wish to survive is pure despotism. Sorry.

electric cars - good
cancer cure - bad

Well both are good if you consider them for what they can do for humanity, however they are BOTH bad for the monetary anti-economy that we live in right now.

How come you've stated electric cars are good but a cancer cure is bad? Surely you don't want people to die from cancer anymore.

you don't think that the world is over populated and that it's only going to get worse? absolutely i want people to die from cancer.

Over or underpopulation is a fluid thing. Dependant upon the state of education, income equality, standard of living and resource allocation. But if you think about it, what nations are the most over populated? The poor ones. Wealthy nations are pretty much leveled out. You see when you have educated people who have their needs met, they don't overpopulate as a measure to counteract the death rates from poverty. THAT is in part why overpopulation exists.

And considering how many people are gonna fall by the wayside during the global economic collapse that we are seeing manifest I wouldn't worry about overpopulation at all. The global situation is changing, and people aren't gonna want to overpopulate. They're gonna be on survival mode.

Speaking as a cancer survivor myself, I'm not offended by your statement, but I don't condone it either. Using overpopulation as your rationalle for wanting people to die is not a good enough excuse. Coz you're overlooking exactly what lies at the root causality of overpopulation.

aren't E cars worse due to the batteries?

Would you like to be first? Ah ha! I thought so....

ruveyn