Longshanks
Veteran
Joined: 2 Feb 2012
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 558
Location: At an undisclosed airbase at Shangri-la
22 Mar 2012, 8:52 pm
Jacoby
Veteran
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash
22 Mar 2012, 10:21 pm
I don't recall GJ ever advocating for the massive disarmament Ron Paul has.
I've seen it in the early debates. And yes, Ron Paul is dangerous too. I prefer Rick Santorum or Paul Ryan.
Longshanks
Ron has never advocated massive disarmament. He wants to get our military out of places they shouldn't be and to adhere to our constitution.
Rick Santorum? *facepalm*
Longshanks
Veteran
Joined: 2 Feb 2012
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 558
Location: At an undisclosed airbase at Shangri-la
23 Mar 2012, 12:20 am
I don't recall GJ ever advocating for the massive disarmament Ron Paul has.
I've seen it in the early debates. And yes, Ron Paul is dangerous too. I prefer Rick Santorum or Paul Ryan.
Longshanks
Ron has never advocated massive disarmament. He wants to get our military out of places they shouldn't be and to adhere to our constitution.
Rick Santorum? *facepalm*
Oh, but that old fraud has! He has stated in one of the debates, "America has no need of a massive military. Once we bring our people home, I see no need for any large military or a nuclear arsenal."
He's also hinted at it in some of his writings. Either way, the lying little turd has the record for the most earmarks in the US Congress and then votes against them all. In fact, his only successful bill during his entire career was the sale of a federal building to the private sector. The guy is a flop. At least Santorum supports the military. He doesn't vote against body armor, like Paul has been known to.
Longshanks
23 Mar 2012, 12:30 am
Rick santorum-
http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2012/01/0 ... &mobile=nc
Reason why it will not work to have Gary Johnson run third - he is republican. I am NOT saying that republican's are bad. But if he is going to run third party then it would take more votes from the republicans than from democrats. So if he were to run third party all it would do is make it so Obama has a much better chance of winning
Jacoby
Veteran
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash
23 Mar 2012, 1:06 am
I don't recall GJ ever advocating for the massive disarmament Ron Paul has.
I've seen it in the early debates. And yes, Ron Paul is dangerous too. I prefer Rick Santorum or Paul Ryan.
Longshanks
Ron has never advocated massive disarmament. He wants to get our military out of places they shouldn't be and to adhere to our constitution.
Rick Santorum? *facepalm*
Oh, but that old fraud has! He has stated in one of the debates, "America has no need of a massive military. Once we bring our people home, I see no need for any large military or a nuclear arsenal."
He's also hinted at it in some of his writings. Either way, the lying little turd has the record for the most earmarks in the US Congress and then votes against them all. In fact, his only successful bill during his entire career was the sale of a federal building to the private sector. The guy is a flop. At least Santorum supports the military. He doesn't vote against body armor, like Paul has been known to.
Longshanks
No.
You have no understanding what earmarks actually are.
Santorum does not support the military, he supports mass murder. Don't confuse the two. He isn't anything close a fiscal conservative and would wipe his butt with the constitution before reading it.
27 Mar 2012, 11:07 pm
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Trump endorses Mike Johnson for Speaker of the House |
13 Nov 2024, 4:19 pm |
| Johnson backs transgender congressiona bathroom restrictions |
22 Nov 2024, 6:18 pm |
| Tory leadership candidate criticized for “stigmatizing” |
16 Oct 2024, 2:53 am |
| Reporter hit by fragment U.S. Senate candidate fires rifle |
23 Oct 2024, 4:23 am |
