Dox47 wrote:
I can see the concern about downing an elephant with a bow being inhumane, but I don't see it as any less humane than how they are killed by their natural predators. I'm surprised and impressed that the lady got it in one shot, the other big game bow hunter that I'm aware of took 5 arrows for his elephant, and at least 2-4 for every other animal that he took (he was going for the big 5). Contrary to popular belief, it doesn't take a giant weapon to dispatch big game, Karamojo Bell took over 3,000 elephants in his career as a professional hunter and culler, most with a 7mm Rigby, though he was a master of the brain shot on elephants. I've heard of it being done with a .22LR with perfect shot placement, though I wouldn't call that advisable by any means. Most countries have a minimum caliber for big game, usually the .375 Holland & Holland, both for the safety of the hunter and the humaneness of the kill.
The size of the gun doesn't determine the deadliness, it's a ratio between firepower and the skill of the shooter. A BB gun could still be fatal if used point blank into the eye.
Once while at a friend's house, 2 Meth-heads broke in to try and take money, they were armed with 8' Pine 2x4s. We fought them off with a co2 pellet gun and an electric staple gun, what makes the difference is how far you are away from the target and where you hit. In this instance nobody died, but the 2 guys were in no condition to fight back after we were done with them.
This reminds me of something I read a while ago about Stun guns in London in the early 90's. Gangs were using stun guns to fight each other, so they passed a law illegalizing stun guns, so the gangs went back to using knives.