visagrunt wrote:
LennytheWicked wrote:
Guys, it said in the article that the student's 504/IEP outlined to remove him from class.
The teacher was 100% wrong here.
You seem very certain of your facts here.
I can certainly imagine circumstances in which that option would not have been avaialble to the teacher. If, for example,removing him from the class would leave him unsupervised or in a position in which he was a danger to himself or to others, then prevailing policy on protection of students would prevail over an IEP.
Making assumptions about the circumstances in which people were acting and then presuming to judge the actions of those people is a poor practice. Why don't we wait until people who actually have knowledge of the entirety of the facts hold the teacher to account, rather than jumping to half-informed conclusions?
And how would putting them in a 'bad kid' box make him in any less of a position to be a danger to himself or others, I an imagine being singled out like that might just increase the chances of him being a danger to himself or others as that is just provoking. I can see sending him out to the hall not being an option, but what the hell is the 'bad kid' box supposed to accomplish.
I don't think its wrong to judge the teachers actions as wrong, when there is no rational reason for the action they took even if the student could not be removed from class at that time.
_________________
We won't go back.