Well, I try to ask myself, what would I do if some kid was majorly acting out (if, indeed, she was) at the time I was called in as a police officer. The way I see it, I have two options. Stand there and allow the child to act-out until she stops -- awkward in the extreme, espeically in a public setting, and perhaps inadvisable depending on the degree of acting-out. (Well, first of all, it wouldn't be a great situation for any Aspie to deal with!! ) I don't think policemen are trained in "Aww, what seems to be the problem, little girl?" So they probably weren't the best choice for getting the child under control. It goes back to the general question, How do you subdue a wild child? (If, indeed, the child was being physically out-of-control.) It just depends on the situation, but one of the morals of this story is, if you call the police, you are going to get police-style action. Teachers should have the authority to restrain (or have restrained by other school officials) a child who is endangering herself or other children, and refuses to stop. This should obviously be done with common-sense carefulness, for adults are many times stronger than small children, and thus should use their capabilities to restrain the children gently yet firmly, accomplishing safety for everyone involved. Perhaps the teacher felt she was not allowed to physically interfere with the child under ANY circumstances, under threat of lawsuit. Some laws in some states seem to dictate such teacher-helplessness.
_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.