‘Game-changer for autism’: 100-year-old drug reverses sympto

Page 3 of 3 [ 38 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

friedmacguffins
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,539

13 Jun 2017, 11:30 am

Do you want to take the drug or dose other people with it?



B19
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,993
Location: New Zealand

13 Jun 2017, 3:53 pm

I can't see why you would even ask me that. No + No.



Darmok
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,030
Location: New England

13 Jun 2017, 4:06 pm

If anybody wants to give me some, I'll try it.


_________________
 
There Are Four Lights!


friedmacguffins
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,539

15 Jun 2017, 4:43 pm

B19 wrote:
A finding from a larger study would not be conclusive without subsequent robust replications by independent (truly independent) researchers.

friedmacguffins wrote:
Do you want to take the drug or dose other people with it?

B19 wrote:
I can't see why you would even ask me that. No + No.

How are people supposed to repeat the study, particularly, under negative assumptions.

My concern was that it would affect healthy body functions.

Darmok wrote:
If anybody wants to give me some, I'll try it.


They might want to give you some.



B19
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,993
Location: New Zealand

15 Jun 2017, 5:07 pm

What you have here is a claim based on "evidence" of a tiny pilot study which is so flimsy in sampling and methodology that it seems unlikely anyone else would try to replicate it. Then the "finding" is reported in sensationalist and misleading ways, by publicity material which avoids mentioning the conflict of interest.

Replication efforts are extremely unlikely. However given the eagerness of some research funding outfits to hand money over to anything with a whiff of "cure" it wouldn't surprise me if the same man gets funding and issues claims to have replicated the finding in the future, with even more sensationalist headlines from gullible reporters.



finn_simba
Butterfly
Butterfly

Joined: 13 Sep 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 13

16 Jun 2017, 5:02 am

This is a promising study, and it is presented in interesting paper http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1 ... 3.424/full, and the study has non methodology weakness other the limitations already pointed out in limitation section. This is pilot study as it would not be cost-effective to include a large sample if you wish to study if Surmin has en effect on human autism. T According to the paper autism can be caused by metabolic imbalance than can be corrected with suramin. The study states that there is a need for further studies with larger study population. This is also needed if they wish to get Suarmin listed as drug approved to treat human autism by US Federal food and drug administration.

A noted if you wish to read about a particular study is a good idea to read the original research paper. This is what I did as the original research paper about Suramin was easy to read, and it stated strong and weak point in this study.