Penn State’s outing club banned - too dangerous

Page 1 of 1 [ 5 posts ] 

ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 37,250
Location: Long Island, New York

30 Apr 2018, 12:29 pm

It's risky out there! That's why PSU's Outing Club can no longer go outside

Quote:
backpacking trip in the Rothrock State Forest and day hikes in the Laurel Highlands and Shenandoah National Park in Virginia were among the Penn State Outing Club’s 2018 spring-term events.

After this weekend, though, the 98-year-old organization has nothing on its calendar, and unless things change, it won’t.

The Outing Club isn’t allowed to go outside anymore.

According to an announcement posted by the club on its website last week, the university will not allow the club to organize and run outdoor, student-led trips starting next semester.

“This is a result,” the announcement said, “of an assessment of risk management by the university that determined that the types of activities in which PSOC engages are above the university’s threshold of acceptable risk for recognized student organizations.”

After a two-month review that did not include consultation with student Outing Club leaders, the university’s offices of Student Affairs and Risk Management made the determination that the hiking, canoeing, kayaking, trail building and camping activities the student-led club has long engaged in are too risky. The club is one of the oldest entirely student-run organizations at Penn State.

The other two outdoor recreation organizations, the Nittany Grotto Caving Club and the Nittany Divers SCUBA Club, were also judged too risky and directed to end trip offerings. Club sports that passed the risk review include the Archery Club, Boxing Club, Alpine Ski Racing Club and Rifle Club.

She said university staff members from the Campus Recreation, Risk Management and Student Activities offices have met with the Outing Club’s faculty adviser and student leaders during the past 15 months about safety concerns related to the club’s activities and practices, and “how those activities can be more safely pursued.”

On a Penn State Reddit site, and the Outing Club’s Facebook page, reports of the university’s decision to shut down the club’s outings were derided by many as hypocritical.

Some of more than 80 Reddit posters wondered if the school will shut down its highly ranked men’s and women’s rugby teams, full-contact club street hockey, and even football because they were risky and potentially injurious.

“The absurdity and hypocrisy of this decision is not lost on me,” said a poster who goes by the name of ghostoftomthwaits. “Looking at what Penn State allows for other student orgs on campus (ahem, I'm looking at you, Frats & Sororities) and even university-sponsored sports, yet they draw a line with students going hiking in Rothrock?”

Christina Platt, the club’s incoming president, was wistful about the loss of affordable outdoor recreation experiences for students and the larger Penn State community, but recognizes that the university’s decision reflects a modern and growing response to liability concerns.

“Our increasingly litigious society is making it far more difficult for people to get outside without the fear of lawsuits for any misstep. I can hardly blame Penn State for protecting itself against further litigation after a number of high-profile scandals in the past decade,” she said.


This is just about money. While Football is way more dangerous it brings in the cash. The football program did not protect students from a sexual predator for decades so now they are going to protect these young ADULTS from the great outdoors and independence. So typical of the American tendency to overcompensate.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

It is Autism Acceptance Month.

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


Trogluddite
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Feb 2016
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,075
Location: Yorkshire, UK

30 Apr 2018, 1:57 pm

I experienced this very thing decades ago when I helped to run our local university's caving club. The club ended up disaffiliating from the Student Union - which, while it meant we were no longer bound by their rules, also meant that we had to severely restrict our trips in order to make them as accessible as possible. The "ball sport" teams were happily being funded just to have their muddy kit washed, while we were refused almost every funding application for essential safety equipment such as ropes and lighting.

The kicker was that our safety record was perfect - in the five or six years I was in the club, not a single person had to go to A & E. On the single occasion that we called out the local fell rescue (for an overdue party who had simply got carried away and lost track of time), we were commended by the rescue team in their report for being well equipped, well trained and following every recommended procedure for a call out. (I should point out that UK caving/fell rescue teams are almost exclusively voluntary, and mostly people who engage in the same pursuits recreationally and love to encourage safe participation.)

Ironically, forcing people who want to experience the underground world to do it via commercial outdoor pursuits organisations has actually made it more dangerous in my opinion. The first rule of caving is "if in doubt, stay out". But when faced with potentially refunding people's money, commercial organisations will take people underground when weather conditions suggest it would be wise to do something else that day. This has been the cause of many high-profile rescue situations, often involving unmanageably large groups of inexperienced youngsters and too few experienced leaders.

It's not just the threat of direct legal action which is a problem here. Unreasonable premiums for institutions to cover third-party insurance for affiliated student activities were often cited by the student union to whom we were affiliated - calculated by insurers who have no idea how to assess the relative safety of different activities.

The bit about being "out of range of communication" just makes me laugh - total self-reliance was a huge part of the thrill and enjoyment for many participants. And what the hell do these people think we used to do 30 years ago when no-one had a personal mobile phone? (not that they would be any use underground anyway.)


_________________
When you are fighting an invisible monster, first throw a bucket of paint over it.


ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 37,250
Location: Long Island, New York

30 Apr 2018, 2:06 pm

Trogluddite wrote:
I experienced this very thing decades ago when I helped to run our local university's caving club. The club ended up disaffiliating from the Student Union - which, while it meant we were no longer bound by their rules, also meant that we had to severely restrict our trips in order to make them as accessible as possible. The "ball sport" teams were happily being funded just to have their muddy kit washed, while we were refused almost every funding application for essential safety equipment such as ropes and lighting.

The kicker was that our safety record was perfect - in the five or six years I was in the club, not a single person had to go to A & E. On the single occasion that we called out the local fell rescue (for an overdue party who had simply got carried away and lost track of time), we were commended by the rescue team in their report for being well equipped, well trained and following every recommended procedure for a call out. (I should point out that UK caving/fell rescue teams are almost exclusively voluntary, and mostly people who engage in the same pursuits recreationally and love to encourage safe participation.)

Ironically, forcing people who want to experience the underground world to do it via commercial outdoor pursuits organisations has actually made it more dangerous in my opinion. The first rule of caving is "if in doubt, stay out". But when faced with potentially refunding people's money, commercial organisations will take people underground when weather conditions suggest it would be wise to do something else that day. This has been the cause of many high-profile rescue situations, often involving unmanageably large groups of inexperienced youngsters and too few experienced leaders.

It's not just the threat of direct legal action which is a problem here. Unreasonable premiums for institutions to cover third-party insurance for affiliated student activities were often cited by the student union to whom we were affiliated - calculated by insurers who have no idea how to assess the relative safety of different activities.

The bit about being "out of range of communication" just makes me laugh - total self-reliance was a huge part of the thrill and enjoyment for many participants. And what the hell do these people think we used to do 30 years ago when no-one had a personal mobile phone? (not that they would be any use underground anyway.)


Out of range of communication was great.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

It is Autism Acceptance Month.

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


Trogluddite
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Feb 2016
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,075
Location: Yorkshire, UK

30 Apr 2018, 2:41 pm

^ Yes, definitely for me. Part of why I liked caving was because, once fully trained, I felt fully in command of the "rules" and found it easy to reason out how to act in the best interests of the group; totally unlike how I felt with other social activities or sports, especially during my difficult student years. I found as well that, with caving, there was very little room for people with big egos - any kind of recklessness endangers the whole group in very obvious ways and with outside help not immediately to hand, so big-headed, manipulative people tended to not be tolerated. The totally "alien" environment was a real "leveller" of people, IMHO, and even the most inexperienced person can be a vital team member. I found self-reliance in the face of such an alien environment was a hell of a lot more rewarding than battling "human nature" when "up top"!

It's especially ironic that while fear of litigation is excluding more and more people from these activities, there's more awareness than ever that contact with nature, exercise, and learning those kind of self-reliance skills are so beneficial for our mental and physical health.


_________________
When you are fighting an invisible monster, first throw a bucket of paint over it.


BobinPgh
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 354

05 May 2018, 11:21 pm

I did go to a Penn State branch campus and was in drama, and our advisor did say "Penn State is paranoid about lawsuits" and they needed lawyers so badly that they ended up buying a law school. Yet how can they, PSU, allow a fraternity that kills young men? But then, I'm not NT, so I don't understand why anyone would join a fraternity at all.

I can't believe that caving (risk of getting lost), and scuba (risk of bends, drowning)are any more dangerous than archery (getting poked with an arrow must hurt), boxing (traumatic brain injury), ski racing (high speed collision) and rifle team (yeah, the risk of possibly getting shot I guess PSU does not consider severe).

PSU I think has done some other stupid unrelated things, in a way I want nothing to with them. Oh, and if you are autistic spectrum and want to go to college, choose another university, PSU is not autism friendly (noise, crowds, mostly not so great teachers).