Fnord wrote:
AspiePony wrote:
AspE wrote:
Wolfram87 wrote:
The biggest point of contention seems to be whether or not wearing a MAGA-hat is equivalent to having a swastika tattooed on your forehead.
No, it's that our worst fears about MAGA being a racist dog whistle have been confirmed by the behavior of those who wear it.
That's Appeal to Ignorance, Appeal to Emotion, a Red Herring, circular logic, Bandwagon Fallacy and a Hasty Generalization. Man you really packed those fallacious argument tactics in that one. Or to put it another way, PROVE IT, not by over-inflated media coverage, but by actual, peer-reviewed scientific studies from accredited institutions, that all people who support MAGA or wear MAGA are racist.
Ease up there, grasshopper. If you're going to challenge another person'
opinion by citing Thompson's "Fallacies of Logic", then you had best actually
know and
understand how those fallacies apply.
Appeal to Ignorance: His statement assumes that all people who support MAGA are racist because they cannot be proven to not be racist. Conversely, neither can they all be proven to racist.
Appeal to Emotion: His statement uses the emotionally charged nature of racism(which is applied to MAGA by him in the statement) to incite anger against MAGA, because 'they are all racist'.
Red Herring: His statement distracts from the actual facts of the incident by bringing up a seemingly related, but overall unrelated topic(whether or not MAGA stands for racism).
Circular Logic: This one might have been a stretch. The explanation for this one would more accurately fit Bandwagon Fallacy.
Bandwagon Fallacy: His statement is based on the overt media coverage that has been directed at intentionally smearing MAGA supporters as all being of a particular belief(racist), rather than factual evidence to support the statement.
Hasty Generalization: His statement makes a generalization that MAGA supporters are all racist, but has not supported his statement with objective facts. Are some racist? Probably. So are some Democrats.
So, did this "grasshopper" explain my usage of these adequately, or do I need to continue?