Jakki wrote:
Mikah wrote:
Ghislaine Maxwell’s ‘little black book’ to remain secret after judge warns against ‘needless’ namedroppinghttps://www.independent.co.uk/news/worl ... 75864.htmlI have a sinking feeling that the investigation ends with her. It feels like nailing the getaway driver.
anything possibly associated with her or her people she engaged with should be open to public scrutiny . Regarding such a crime especially if she was found guilty . How can there be such a thing as " needless name dropping" regarding a little black book in and around thiis woman and the stuff she was involved in. am suspicious that someone is still being protected in this situation.
No doubt a lot of powerful people are being protected in this situation, but lets not forget that under the law they are innocent until proven guilty, and it would be near impossible to prove that they had any idea girls they had contact with were underage. Given those two factors, as well as the level of volatility any exposure in the social media age creates, I can see where the judge's thoughts were going.
Let me be clear that I am not excusing anything, or in any way "happy" about the reality of the situation. Just, I can see how little to nothing can be gained while a lot of additional harm could be caused.
_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).
Last edited by DW_a_mom on 30 Dec 2021, 5:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.