ruveyn wrote:
How do you explain original and seminal geniuses like Einstein and Newton?
ruveyn
Simple. They lack this pathway. Any multicelled organism, especially one that reproduces sexually as all mammals do, will have a range of possible outcomes genetically. Mutations are a way to protect against extinction and ensure species survival. The web of what's possible, and why it's beneficial, has only begun to have its surface scratched by scientists. Outcomes that seem inimical to species survival, such as homosexuality (which pitches one out of the pool of potential reproducers), obviously have SOME utility, since homosexuality has been observed in dogs and horses, and maybe 3% of humans exhibit homosexual tendencies even in societies where same sex relations are punishable by death. If you get into a mutation that allows a select few to exhibit behavior and skills that greatly advance survival, there's an obvious reason why it would exist. The inventors of the spear, the wheel, and the plow, all tremendously beneficial, probably had it. However, they likely weren't popular among the rest of the tribe. It's possible that some geniuses who are frequently labeled aspie, but weren't, such as Edison, Jefferson, and Franklin, simply lacked this pathway.