Board index › General Discussion › News and Current Events

What Drives Trump Crazy About the Mueller Investigation

Page 9 of 10 [ 156 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

Previous topic | Next topic

VegetableMan
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,208
Location: Illinois

10 Dec 2018, 4:25 pm

kokopelli wrote:
VegetableMan wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Russian bot farms.


Where the pee tape is hidden.


Which may be a red herring. The fact that Trump laundered money for Russia is much more damning.


Not seen you mention that the Clintons took over 100 million from a Kremlin bank while selling off 20% of the US's Uranium.


Talk of the Uranium deal from the Trump/Republican perspective is BS as I understand it. I concede I know little of the details about this. If there was anything to it, I would think a full blown investigation would be carried out against the Clintons, as the Republicans are running the show. But the Republicans are doing nothing more than yelling unfounded charges, which tells me there's nothing there.


As you understand it, won't disagree with that. Haha are you serious? The Clintons have got away with so much it's unreal. A lot of Republicans still wish Clinton won.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/press-release


You don't seriously expect me to take anything Wikileaks says as legit, do you?



Actually, I don't know why you wouldn't take it seriously. In over ten years that Wikileaks has existed, everything they've released has been proven to be 100% accurate. U.S courts have never been able to indict him for releasing false information. Liberals used to love him when he was exposing s**t on conservatives, but now they want him locked up because he exposed the Dems for the s**t they're doing. If it weren't so disgusting, it would be hysterical.


Trying to spin much?

Those who are under confidentiality agreements related to top secret information should be prosecuted for every release of theirs about that information. It doesn't matter if it is true or false. It doesn't matter if it confirms something everyone already knows. It is illegal for them to release it.

One thing they would really like is to get whoever is passing it on to Wikileaks regardless of whether it is true or not.

As for Assange, he has issues of his own that he could be prosecuted for apart from publishing classified information. I don't know what the status is on his rape and molestation charges.

I'd bet that Ecuador is regretting their act of granting him asylum in their industry. It doesn't sound like they are very happy with him.



Yeah, we have to stop the leaking of information that exposes corruption. That's not in the best interest of the oligarchs. We must protect the people who are plundering and looting the country, and keeping us in a perpetual state of war.


_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?

Oscar Meyer Lansky


kokopelli
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Nov 2017
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,399
Location: amid the sunlight and the dust and the wind

10 Dec 2018, 4:29 pm

VegetableMan wrote:
kokopelli wrote:
VegetableMan wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Russian bot farms.


Where the pee tape is hidden.


Which may be a red herring. The fact that Trump laundered money for Russia is much more damning.


Not seen you mention that the Clintons took over 100 million from a Kremlin bank while selling off 20% of the US's Uranium.


Talk of the Uranium deal from the Trump/Republican perspective is BS as I understand it. I concede I know little of the details about this. If there was anything to it, I would think a full blown investigation would be carried out against the Clintons, as the Republicans are running the show. But the Republicans are doing nothing more than yelling unfounded charges, which tells me there's nothing there.


As you understand it, won't disagree with that. Haha are you serious? The Clintons have got away with so much it's unreal. A lot of Republicans still wish Clinton won.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/press-release


You don't seriously expect me to take anything Wikileaks says as legit, do you?



Actually, I don't know why you wouldn't take it seriously. In over ten years that Wikileaks has existed, everything they've released has been proven to be 100% accurate. U.S courts have never been able to indict him for releasing false information. Liberals used to love him when he was exposing s**t on conservatives, but now they want him locked up because he exposed the Dems for the s**t they're doing. If it weren't so disgusting, it would be hysterical.


Trying to spin much?

Those who are under confidentiality agreements related to top secret information should be prosecuted for every release of theirs about that information. It doesn't matter if it is true or false. It doesn't matter if it confirms something everyone already knows. It is illegal for them to release it.

One thing they would really like is to get whoever is passing it on to Wikileaks regardless of whether it is true or not.

As for Assange, he has issues of his own that he could be prosecuted for apart from publishing classified information. I don't know what the status is on his rape and molestation charges.

I'd bet that Ecuador is regretting their act of granting him asylum in their industry. It doesn't sound like they are very happy with him.



Yeah, we have to stop the leaking of information that exposes corruption. That's not in the best interest of the oligarchs. We must protect the people who are plundering and looting the country, and keeping us in a perpetual state of war.


We must stop the leaking of all information that affects our national security. The last thing we want is to give rogue countries help in attacking us.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,732
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

10 Dec 2018, 4:34 pm

kokopelli wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Russian bot farms.


Where the pee tape is hidden.


Which may be a red herring. The fact that Trump laundered money for Russia is much more damning.


Not seen you mention that the Clintons took over 100 million from a Kremlin bank while selling off 20% of the US's Uranium.


Talk of the Uranium deal from the Trump/Republican perspective is BS as I understand it. I concede I know little of the details about this. If there was anything to it, I would think a full blown investigation would be carried out against the Clintons, as the Republicans are running the show. But the Republicans are doing nothing more than yelling unfounded charges, which tells me there's nothing there.


You're right. The Trump fans talk like we are shipping our Uranium to Russian.

The fact is that the Russians bought a company that has large amounts of uranium around the world. If I remember correctly, they were mainly interested in the large deposits in the Ukraine owned by that company. As for uranium in the United States, that uranium is subject to very strong export controls. The odds of the company getting permission from the US government to ship uranium to Russia is vanishingly small.


Thank you. 8)


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


VegetableMan
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,208
Location: Illinois

10 Dec 2018, 4:36 pm

kokopelli wrote:
VegetableMan wrote:
kokopelli wrote:
VegetableMan wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Russian bot farms.


Where the pee tape is hidden.


Which may be a red herring. The fact that Trump laundered money for Russia is much more damning.


Not seen you mention that the Clintons took over 100 million from a Kremlin bank while selling off 20% of the US's Uranium.


Talk of the Uranium deal from the Trump/Republican perspective is BS as I understand it. I concede I know little of the details about this. If there was anything to it, I would think a full blown investigation would be carried out against the Clintons, as the Republicans are running the show. But the Republicans are doing nothing more than yelling unfounded charges, which tells me there's nothing there.


As you understand it, won't disagree with that. Haha are you serious? The Clintons have got away with so much it's unreal. A lot of Republicans still wish Clinton won.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/press-release


You don't seriously expect me to take anything Wikileaks says as legit, do you?



Actually, I don't know why you wouldn't take it seriously. In over ten years that Wikileaks has existed, everything they've released has been proven to be 100% accurate. U.S courts have never been able to indict him for releasing false information. Liberals used to love him when he was exposing s**t on conservatives, but now they want him locked up because he exposed the Dems for the s**t they're doing. If it weren't so disgusting, it would be hysterical.


Trying to spin much?

Those who are under confidentiality agreements related to top secret information should be prosecuted for every release of theirs about that information. It doesn't matter if it is true or false. It doesn't matter if it confirms something everyone already knows. It is illegal for them to release it.

One thing they would really like is to get whoever is passing it on to Wikileaks regardless of whether it is true or not.

As for Assange, he has issues of his own that he could be prosecuted for apart from publishing classified information. I don't know what the status is on his rape and molestation charges.

I'd bet that Ecuador is regretting their act of granting him asylum in their industry. It doesn't sound like they are very happy with him.



Yeah, we have to stop the leaking of information that exposes corruption. That's not in the best interest of the oligarchs. We must protect the people who are plundering and looting the country, and keeping us in a perpetual state of war.


We must stop the leaking of all information that affects our national security. The last thing we want is to give rogue countries help in attacking us.



The biggest threat to our national security is the continuation of interventionist foreign policy. How about that?


_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?

Oscar Meyer Lansky


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,732
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

10 Dec 2018, 4:37 pm

JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Russian bot farms.


Where the pee tape is hidden.


Which may be a red herring. The fact that Trump laundered money for Russia is much more damning.


Not seen you mention that the Clintons took over 100 million from a Kremlin bank while selling off 20% of the US's Uranium.


Talk of the Uranium deal from the Trump/Republican perspective is BS as I understand it. I concede I know little of the details about this. If there was anything to it, I would think a full blown investigation would be carried out against the Clintons, as the Republicans are running the show. But the Republicans are doing nothing more than yelling unfounded charges, which tells me there's nothing there.


As you understand it, won't disagree with that. Haha are you serious? The Clintons have got away with so much it's unreal. A lot of Republicans still wish Clinton won.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/press-release


You don't seriously expect me to take anything Wikileaks says as legit, do you?


See I knew you'd do that. This is why you will never learn or change. You didn't even bother to read it. In the piece it links to a story about this issue from the New York Times. So now what will your excuse be for denying the truth?

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/c ... .html?_r=0


Kokopelli gave more than enough of a concise explanation. Trumpanzees and Wikileakers don't have a leg to stand on.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Biscuitman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2013
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,674
Location: Dunking jammy dodgers

12 Dec 2018, 12:08 pm

Cohen gets 3 years in prison

Fair play to Mueller I guess.



TW1ZTY
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Sep 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,115
Location: The US of freakin A <_<

12 Dec 2018, 10:57 pm

If he gets proven guilty the Trumpets are all going to go apeshit about it and insist that the evil liberals made it all up. I won't be surprised if those nuts try to kill all of us after that. We know that's what they all would secretly love to do. :roll:



LoveNotHate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,195
Location: USA

12 Dec 2018, 11:45 pm

The boy who cried wolf.

10,000 negative media reports numbs people to the 10,001.

Image


_________________
After a failure, the easiest thing to do is to blame someone else.


JohnPowell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2016
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,806
Location: Palestine

13 Dec 2018, 2:23 pm

kokopelli wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Russian bot farms.


Where the pee tape is hidden.


Which may be a red herring. The fact that Trump laundered money for Russia is much more damning.


Not seen you mention that the Clintons took over 100 million from a Kremlin bank while selling off 20% of the US's Uranium.


Talk of the Uranium deal from the Trump/Republican perspective is BS as I understand it. I concede I know little of the details about this. If there was anything to it, I would think a full blown investigation would be carried out against the Clintons, as the Republicans are running the show. But the Republicans are doing nothing more than yelling unfounded charges, which tells me there's nothing there.


You're right. The Trump fans talk like we are shipping our Uranium to Russian.

The fact is that the Russians bought a company that has large amounts of uranium around the world. If I remember correctly, they were mainly interested in the large deposits in the Ukraine owned by that company. As for uranium in the United States, that uranium is subject to very strong export controls. The odds of the company getting permission from the US government to ship uranium to Russia is vanishingly small.


"Vanishingly small" yet the evidence is right there in the link I posted.


_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"


JohnPowell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2016
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,806
Location: Palestine

13 Dec 2018, 2:25 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
kokopelli wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Russian bot farms.


Where the pee tape is hidden.


Which may be a red herring. The fact that Trump laundered money for Russia is much more damning.


Not seen you mention that the Clintons took over 100 million from a Kremlin bank while selling off 20% of the US's Uranium.


Talk of the Uranium deal from the Trump/Republican perspective is BS as I understand it. I concede I know little of the details about this. If there was anything to it, I would think a full blown investigation would be carried out against the Clintons, as the Republicans are running the show. But the Republicans are doing nothing more than yelling unfounded charges, which tells me there's nothing there.


You're right. The Trump fans talk like we are shipping our Uranium to Russian.

The fact is that the Russians bought a company that has large amounts of uranium around the world. If I remember correctly, they were mainly interested in the large deposits in the Ukraine owned by that company. As for uranium in the United States, that uranium is subject to very strong export controls. The odds of the company getting permission from the US government to ship uranium to Russia is vanishingly small.


Thank you. 8)


Thanks for what? He just denied the evidence.


_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"


JohnPowell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2016
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,806
Location: Palestine

13 Dec 2018, 2:31 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Russian bot farms.


Where the pee tape is hidden.


Which may be a red herring. The fact that Trump laundered money for Russia is much more damning.


Not seen you mention that the Clintons took over 100 million from a Kremlin bank while selling off 20% of the US's Uranium.


Talk of the Uranium deal from the Trump/Republican perspective is BS as I understand it. I concede I know little of the details about this. If there was anything to it, I would think a full blown investigation would be carried out against the Clintons, as the Republicans are running the show. But the Republicans are doing nothing more than yelling unfounded charges, which tells me there's nothing there.


As you understand it, won't disagree with that. Haha are you serious? The Clintons have got away with so much it's unreal. A lot of Republicans still wish Clinton won.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/press-release


You don't seriously expect me to take anything Wikileaks says as legit, do you?


See I knew you'd do that. This is why you will never learn or change. You didn't even bother to read it. In the piece it links to a story about this issue from the New York Times. So now what will your excuse be for denying the truth?

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/c ... .html?_r=0


Kokopelli gave more than enough of a concise explanation. Trumpanzees and Wikileakers don't have a leg to stand on.


No he didn't, he just said it was unlikely even though the evidence is in the link. You and him just don't like reality. Neither of you even bothered to read the link. You don't have a leg to stand on. It's great how people with your ideology talk about not dehumanizing foreign gangs like MS-13 yet you liken American Trump voters to monkeys.


_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,732
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

13 Dec 2018, 3:39 pm

JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Russian bot farms.


Where the pee tape is hidden.


Which may be a red herring. The fact that Trump laundered money for Russia is much more damning.


Not seen you mention that the Clintons took over 100 million from a Kremlin bank while selling off 20% of the US's Uranium.


Talk of the Uranium deal from the Trump/Republican perspective is BS as I understand it. I concede I know little of the details about this. If there was anything to it, I would think a full blown investigation would be carried out against the Clintons, as the Republicans are running the show. But the Republicans are doing nothing more than yelling unfounded charges, which tells me there's nothing there.


As you understand it, won't disagree with that. Haha are you serious? The Clintons have got away with so much it's unreal. A lot of Republicans still wish Clinton won.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/press-release


You don't seriously expect me to take anything Wikileaks says as legit, do you?


See I knew you'd do that. This is why you will never learn or change. You didn't even bother to read it. In the piece it links to a story about this issue from the New York Times. So now what will your excuse be for denying the truth?

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/c ... .html?_r=0


Kokopelli gave more than enough of a concise explanation. Trumpanzees and Wikileakers don't have a leg to stand on.


No he didn't, he just said it was unlikely even though the evidence is in the link. You and him just don't like reality. Neither of you even bothered to read the link. You don't have a leg to stand on. It's great how people with your ideology talk about not dehumanizing foreign gangs like MS-13 yet you liken American Trump voters to monkeys.


MS-13 was founded on American soil and was exported to Latin America, so it's hardly foreign. Besides, that particular gang, while known for being especially savage, are hardly particularly large, and constitutes the Latino bogeyman the right needs to scare the Trumpanzees into line.
Did you have any objection to the right dehumanizing the Obama family as monkeys and apes?


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

13 Dec 2018, 4:40 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
MS-13 was founded on American soil and was exported to Latin America, so it's hardly foreign. Besides, that particular gang, while known for being especially savage, are hardly particularly large, and constitutes the Latino bogeyman the right needs to scare the Trumpanzees into line.
Did you have any objection to the right dehumanizing the Obama family as monkeys and apes?


Ah fighting fire with fire.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,732
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

13 Dec 2018, 9:13 pm

EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
MS-13 was founded on American soil and was exported to Latin America, so it's hardly foreign. Besides, that particular gang, while known for being especially savage, are hardly particularly large, and constitutes the Latino bogeyman the right needs to scare the Trumpanzees into line.
Did you have any objection to the right dehumanizing the Obama family as monkeys and apes?


Ah fighting fire with fire.


African Americans have been dehumanized as apes for centuries because of the color of their skin, and the fact that they originated in Africa. With Trump supporters, it's only because of how they act and think.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

13 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
MS-13 was founded on American soil and was exported to Latin America, so it's hardly foreign. Besides, that particular gang, while known for being especially savage, are hardly particularly large, and constitutes the Latino bogeyman the right needs to scare the Trumpanzees into line.
Did you have any objection to the right dehumanizing the Obama family as monkeys and apes?


Ah fighting fire with fire.


African Americans have been dehumanized as apes for centuries because of the color of their skin, and the fact that they originated in Africa. With Trump supporters, it's only because of how they act and think.


What's it called when group A does or says the same things they accuse and condemn group B for?



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,732
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

13 Dec 2018, 9:36 pm

EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
MS-13 was founded on American soil and was exported to Latin America, so it's hardly foreign. Besides, that particular gang, while known for being especially savage, are hardly particularly large, and constitutes the Latino bogeyman the right needs to scare the Trumpanzees into line.
Did you have any objection to the right dehumanizing the Obama family as monkeys and apes?


Ah fighting fire with fire.


African Americans have been dehumanized as apes for centuries because of the color of their skin, and the fact that they originated in Africa. With Trump supporters, it's only because of how they act and think.


What's it called when group A does or says the same things they accuse and condemn group B for?


Any black American can tell you that calling someone an ape as a racial slur is far worse than describing someone as dumb with the ape slur.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer