It's official: An asteroid wiped out the dinosaurs

Page 2 of 2 [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

sartresue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Age: 70
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,313
Location: The Castle of Shock and Awe-tism

19 Mar 2010, 10:11 am

Apple_in_my_Eye wrote:
pat2rome wrote:
RightGalaxy wrote:
Neil Degrasse Tyson, notable PhD (from NOVA on public television), claimed that the iron in that asteroid matches the iron in our blood. Gives me the chills...but I like it!


Of course it does, iron is iron.


He might've meant that the isotopic composition of the iron is different than that of terrestrial iron.


Bodily fluids topic

Blood is thicker than water. :lol: :roll:

Reptiles are not as adaptable to climate change as mammals, and humans have their own vulnerabilities. I believe Homo Sapiens Sapiens also has a limited shelf life, and we carry the roots of our own destruction. Of course, when that will be is speculation. Maybe another asteroid or some other as yet unimaginable destructive force.

The jury is still out on the raccoon. :wink:


_________________
Radiant Aspergian
Awe-Tistic Whirlwind

Phuture Phounder of the Philosophy Phactory

NOT a believer of Mystic Woo-Woo


Apple_in_my_Eye
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,420
Location: in my brain

19 Mar 2010, 2:48 pm

One of my professors in college was actually the guy who came up with the whole "meteor/comet killed the dinosaurs" theory. Or him and his thesis advisor anyway (Luis Alvarez). He talked about it in class a few times:

He said his advisor (Alvarez) was reading some journal article saying that mass extinctions seemed to be periodic, and that Alvarez thought that was totally stupid. He thought they probably just did their math wrong. Muller said it didn't seem completely impossible, but Alvarez dismissed that and told him he was using a "no think approach." So Muller got mad and thought for a minute, and off the top of his head speculated that there could be a star in a 26-million year orbit, and which would actually put it at just the right range to graze the Oort cloud. So he (Muller) says maybe every 26-million years it knocks some "rocks/ice" loose and they stream towards the Earth and hit it. Alvarez was apparently a little stunned, and said "that's pretty good. We ought to try to see if we can prove that." So they started working on it.

One of the things they did was to look at sedimentary layers. Apparently you can easily see where the mass death happens. They looked right below that for a layer of dust -- specifically dust of extra-terrestrial (non-Earth) origin. And this is apparently possible, by looking at the mix of isotopes of certain elements (I forget which ones). And they found it. They looked in a number of spots around the globe and it was consistently there. Why didn't cinch the hypothesis (this was more than 20 years ago), I don't know.

They also started looking for that 26-million year orbit star, but last I heard (90's) they hadn't found it.

He (Muller) wrote a book about it called "Nemesis," his proposed name for the star.

As to how much iron a metor impact might add to all the iron on the Earth, I have no idea, but the blood comment isn't completely implausible.



pandd
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2006
Age: 51
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,430

19 Mar 2010, 6:41 pm

Inventor wrote:
Racoons have the hands,.

So does my chin chilla, and he makes/uses tools.



FePixie
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Age: 56
Gender: Female
Posts: 157
Location: NZ

25 Mar 2010, 10:24 pm

The fossil records show it wiped 98% of all species off the earth in one go

Another asteroid the same size would only be visible from earth about a month before impact

Hope i get a front row seat :D



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

04 Apr 2010, 12:43 am

FePixie wrote:
The fossil records show it wiped 98% of all species off the earth in one go



That is a bit on the high side. The species that lived in the oceans did not fare that badly.

In any case the smaller proto-mammals survived which is why we are having this conversation.

It think it was the Siberian and Deccan traps that did a 98 percent job on life on the planet.

ruveyn



FePixie
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Age: 56
Gender: Female
Posts: 157
Location: NZ

04 Apr 2010, 2:27 am

ruveyn wrote:
FePixie wrote:
It think it was the Siberian and Deccan traps that did a 98 percent job on life on the planet.
ruveyn

you might be right there - this particular little splat just didnt hit quite so hard - but others have - and probably several times over in the pre fossil eternities too - so imagining that wont happen again is entirely unrealistic isnt it? Image



AspieKid
Butterfly
Butterfly

User avatar

Joined: 1 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 15
Location: IL

04 Apr 2010, 10:45 am

I KNEW IT IN PRESCHOOL I HAD A BET WITH SOME KID THAT THOUGHT VOLCANOES WIPED THEM OUT I SAID A ASTEROID I KNEW IT!! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! ! :D



Stone_Man
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2009
Age: 75
Gender: Male
Posts: 266
Location: retired wanderer in the Southwest deserts

07 Apr 2010, 7:59 am

fidelis wrote:
If we were an accident, why are we still here. I think it was inevitable that intelligent life rise. It's the only thing that can adapt better than simplicity (bacteria.)


I'm not so sure that's true. The bacteria have been here a lot longer than we have (and they'll probably still be here when we're long gone).

Intelligence may be a great evolutionary adaption, but it's not the only one that works.