b9 wrote:
leejosepho wrote:
b9 wrote:
the topic title states that the ban is on bulls fighting.
No, the word is singular, but you do have a bit of a point:
it is not a significant point you raise.
Is it truly insignificant to distinguish the "sport" of bull fighting from the matter of bulls fighting over a cow? But all of that is irrelevant now that I understand you were only being sarcastic while considering your sarcasm as "joking" amongst people inclined toward hearing things literally. Such is life here on WP, eh?!
b9 wrote:
if there is a statement that says "male bonding is illegal" then it does not mean only one male even though the noun is singular.
Understood, but the terms "male bonding" and "bulls fighting" would be similar where "male bonding" and "bull fighting" are not.
b9 wrote:
"female acceptance into the fraternity has now been banned" is just as valid as "females acceptances into the fraternity has now been banned"..
"females acceptances" would have to be unnecessarily written "females' acceptances" to be valid at all.
b9 wrote:
i am not going to continue with my [sarcasm].
All is well!
_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================