auntblabby wrote:
Chronos wrote:
At the time, I would imagine. If you would like to illustrate how, at the time, you were not, you may do so.
you just love rubbing salt into the wounds you inflict, don't you? you could give insult comics a run for their money. anyways, may you live long and prosper.
It is not an insult. We are all subject to idiocy at some point in our lives. For example, a large number of individuals took out sub-prime rate loans in the late 90's and a large number of lenders loaned to individuals who should not have been given loans. They both made short sighted, bad, uninformed and idiotic decisions.
With respect to the military, consider that when one joins the military they typically indenture themselves to four to six years of being under the direct authority of a system which will control the most minute details of their lives and agree to participating in situations which may very well cost them their lives.
Such a contract should not be entered into lightly without thorough investigation of what one is getting themselves into.
Recruiters are sales peoples. Just as a sales person would not tell you the bad points about the product they are selling, and just as a loan officer will not tell you if another company offers a lower interest loan, a recruiter will not tell you the bad points about joining the military.
You obviously did not have an enjoyable military experience and you seem to place the blame for that on the recruiter. Unless the recruiter blatantly lied by a means other than omission, I do not see how it is fair that the recruiter should be blamed.
It is not their job to make informed choices for you, and if one can never admit fault on their part for such things, one is doomed to make similar bad choices in the future.