Moog wrote:
Gedrene wrote:
Well I guess that shows they have the will to do it. That and Moog is using an argument from incredulity.
It's not an argument it's an opinion. I'm not even saying I'm right.
No offence, but an opinion can still contain an argument. I wasn't making a dig. It was anecdotal.
Moog wrote:
Not everything everyone says is an 'argument'
I don't mean a yak yak argument. I mean a this is true, that is true argument.
Moog wrote:
This does speak volumes about how you view what communication is for.
What? For transmitting ideas? Personal enjoyment? That sort of thing? Well yeah, most people do. As for the allusion being made I regret to inform you that you are focusing on the wrong definition of the word argument.
Moog wrote:
I'm not even sure what the purpose of your post is. If you disagree, then do so?
I thought the disagreement was implied when I explained why I disagreed with it and said nothing else. That's what Nt's do right? Verbal shorthand as it were.
Moog wrote:
Respectfully to both of you, if you don't like my opinion, you don't have to agree. No problem.
And if we don't agree, we'll tell you why. Or is that not intuitive enough for you?