Disraeli wrote:
Mike1 wrote:
Disraeli wrote:
I fail to follow your point, how is the media responsible for this guy taking this boy hostage?
It sounds to me like that guy took the boy hostage because he had AS, because he associates it with bad things after the Sandy Hook tragedy.
He didn't even know the boy; the boy was selected at random. How would he even know?
I have followed this hostage story closely. Dykes didn't know the child had AS, he kidnapped him because the child had fainted and therefore was easy to carry off.
J-Greens wrote:
I don't see the good news here...another person has died. How is that good news?
It is not good that two people have died. It is however good that the kid is alive and well. So many hostage situations have gone wrong, how can you not cheer when there's one where the hostage is saved? That's my opinion, anyway.
_________________
Be complete within yourself and you will never disappoint, even in solitude.