Saudi man to be paralyzed as punishment
OliveOilMom
Veteran
Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 11,447
Location: About 50 miles past the middle of nowhere
So if your parent/child/sibling committed a horrible crime, would you rat them out? I think most people know that would be the right thing to do, but actually doing it seems to me really difficult (and I don't even have siblings or children).
I would never rat my child out for that. Ever. I would help my child get rid of a body if need be, or I would confess to doing it myself if it came down to my child getting caught, but I would never, ever do that to my child. I wouldn't support what they did probably, but that doesn't mean I'd have a hand in sending them to prison or the electric chair. It also means I'd do everything in my power to keep them out of it.
As I said, I'm a hypocrite when it comes to my own kids, but I suspect everybody would be.
_________________
I'm giving it another shot. We will see.
My forum is still there and everyone is welcome to come join as well. There is a private women only subforum there if anyone is interested. Also, there is no CAPTCHA.
The link to the forum is http://www.rightplanet.proboards.com
Fair enough.
I think you are wrong in each and every assumption you make and conclusion that you draw--but I respect that there is a legitimate difference of opinion that is unaffected by your personal circumstances.
_________________
--James
Actually, Ruvyn, this actually IS the same god and the same mountain of the Jewish YHWH, albiet without the past 2000 years of changing, and moderation of doctrinal belief that Judaism, Christianity, and more liberal strains of Islam have progressed in.
Remember the old Judaic law of retribution via 'An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth'? --This is the same put into practice.
Also, because of the fact that Saudi Arabia is the heart of the Islamic world, and they have plenty of oil money to fund Wahhabism/Salafism, their strain of Islam is quickly becoming the standard form of Islam. When they announce a Wahhabi/Salafi Califate, be very afraid.
Oh yes, because building a civilization founded on the ideas of mercy, forgiveness, love, and not passing judgement which Jesus preached could only result in a bloodthirsty, vindictive society.
Crusades?
Salem witch trials?
These were not founded on the ideas of mercy, forgiveness, love, and not passing judgement which Jesus preached. Trying to show ideals to be flawed by giving examples of people who didn't attempt them doesn't work.
_________________
"A dead thing can go with the stream, but only a living thing can go against it." --G. K. Chesterton
Christians act out of hatred every single day. It doesn't matter when it happened. I'm pointing out obvious examples of terrible things done in the name of the Christian God.
A lot of people who do wrong in the name of a God claim that it is out of "goodness".
In regards to everyone living according Jesus' teachings, you are talking about a utopia where everyone wants to do the right thing, and that doesn't exist. Such a utopia would also not require the premise of Christianity.
What is the deal with Christians trying to force their ideals on everyone else or saying things like "Laws should be made according Christian law" or whatever? If you really advocated for peace, love, understanding, etc, wouldn't you advocate for a free society where people can believe what they want AND be good people who love and care for each other?
Because there ARE plenty of non-Christians who are great people.
I am not against Christianity, but rather their feeling of superiority and that everyone should live according to what they believe. I'm against atheists who behave in the same manner.
Incredible statements like this should not be made without supporting evidence.
A lot of people who do wrong claim it is out of goodness. People don't generally claim to be acting out of evil motives. People generally claim to be doing the right thing.
Most of this is a tautology, and the part that isn't is assuming that your idea of what good is is what good actually is. In other words, you are doing what you're accusing Christians of doing -- assuming that you know what good really is and wondering why we can't all just do that.
Somewhat less importantly, you're assuming that Christians would oppose a free society.
You say this, but you are ranting against Christians, and you are not ranting against atheists.
_________________
"A dead thing can go with the stream, but only a living thing can go against it." --G. K. Chesterton
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,511
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
In all fairness, I doubt any of the divisions of Christianity - with the possible exception of certain witch fearing groups in Africa - support the burning of witches or Crusades today.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Incredible statements like this should not be made without supporting evidence.
A lot of people who do wrong claim it is out of goodness. People don't generally claim to be acting out of evil motives. People generally claim to be doing the right thing.
Most of this is a tautology, and the part that isn't is assuming that your idea of what good is is what good actually is. In other words, you are doing what you're accusing Christians of doing -- assuming that you know what good really is and wondering why we can't all just do that.
Somewhat less importantly, you're assuming that Christians would oppose a free society.
You say this, but you are ranting against Christians, and you are not ranting against atheists.
1. How can I cite things I see and hear every day in my life? You will just tell me they are isolated incidents as if I live in a vacuum or that I am lying about them
2. Exactly. That's what I just said.
3. I'm not assuming I know what good actually is. Just pointing out what it isn't, and an obvious alternative to making everything adhere to "Christian law". I'm saying no one should impose their morality on someone else.
4. According to many posts on WP made my Christians, they certainly do seem to oppose one because their objective morality should prevail, at least in the USA.
5. Because I'm addressing this issue with regards to Christianity. I've complained about atheists elsewhere on the forum; check my posts if you are in doubt. I was pointing out that Christians aren't the only ones who want to run things solely their way.
A lot of this is very pointless and is like debate for its own sake.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
So...... you don't think there are any Christians who would be on board for killing all the Muslims in the world if they could get away with it? I'm sure there are and also that they'd use 9/11 as a cover for the actual motive.
You might not think that way, but there are many people who have such thoughts.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,511
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
You might not think that way, but there are many people who have such thoughts.
There are hateful bigots justifying violence and murder with Christianity, but I doubt you'd find legitimate Christians among them. Unfortunately, such bigots are ranting from the pulpit on TV and/or mega churches, and have even gotten them elected to public office by evoking the name of the All Mighty. I don't believe, though, that such persons make up the majority of Americans calling themselves Christians.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Moomingirl
Veteran
Joined: 19 Mar 2013
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,084
Location: away with the fairies
<sigh> Can't we all just get along?
Personally I don't care if you are Christian, Muslim, pagan, hindu, Buddhist, or atheist (or indeed anything else, no wish to offend any groups I have left out). As long as you are not hurting anyone, what does it matter if you believe in god, Allah, or a three headed blue monkey??
I am no expert on religion, but I am pretty sure that the basic premise of most of them is good. Religion gives some people hope, guidelines to live by, and a sense of belonging. It is only when people turn 'belonging' to one group into 'therefore the others must be wrong' that there is a problem.
Some of the 'fire and brimstone' and 'an eye for an eye' stuff I am pretty sure was meant as lessons or a warning to people, and was rather heavy handed because when it was written people weren't highly educated, so you couldn't be too subtle.
I think a large proportion of religious people are just getting on with their lives as best they can, and not worrying about the rest of the world. The issues seem to be with extremists (from all belief groups), people who want to take things too literally, or people who are determined to twist the words to suit themselves.
Well, that's my two cents worth. Tolerance people; tolerance