shadexiii wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
If it's possible to have just a touch of schizophrenia, that's me.
It is my belief that most "maladies" (throwing the Autism spectrum in here, the world considers it a detriment, hence the quotes) that one can have psychologically are not as binary as they are presented. I've been sure for quite some time that I'm at least a little bit "crazy" (specific diagnosis unimportant, people view me as a bit crazy, including myself, that's enough.) This is an issue on so many levels. If someone doesn't have "enough" symptoms, they may not get the appropriate treatment. (Or insurance companies will pull BS and not pay towards medication.) If someone has symptoms, and does something like what happened Monday, it is easy (and common) to lump anyone with said diagnosis together as a homogeneous group.
Diagnoses are great...as somewhere to start. Using them as the de-facto method of classification and treatment is not a good idea.
Well, ya, mental diagnoses are just theoretical compartmentalizations, whereas living, human brains are not simply "this" type or "that" type 100%. I'd love to see complete, 3-D brain scans of 1,000 differently-diagnosed brains, and just be able to view and appreciate the way they
ALL fade across diagnostic lines! The current classifications are simply the best we have, not truly accurate.
_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.