Not so nice parents
Meta-analysis is not improvising. It's systematic usage of mathematical tools to re-check previous interpretations of results, particularily in search for hidden biases.
It's done especially when experimental values seem divergent, as was the case with autism heritability research.
_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.
<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>
It's done especially when experimental values seem divergent, as was the case with autism heritability research.
Meta-analysis is improvising when you can't collect the data yourself, you rely on second hand information from disparate publications. The risk is comparing "apples with oranges" in terms of controlling internal validity of different studies.
Are you just trying to invalidate one of the standard science tools?
_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.
<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,366
Location: Long Island, New York
That it why it behooves the ND movement to change their elitist ”Aspie” image. Do I think the image is fair, not at all, but it is what it is. They have got to show that just because a child is severely autistic, that does not mean the person is doomed to be a lifelong burden to parents and who will be so miserable the humane thing to do is to make sure it does not happen.
I suppose we - as the humanity - still understand too little of autism to be anywhere close to what you describe.
ABA "cure" is just teaching children to mask their symptoms, it's not cure at all.
My bet is the most we can do about a real autism cure would be (possibly multiple) treatments transitioning a severily autistic child to the "aspie" functioning.
ABA is about more then masking especially as it pertains to the very young. Our brains rapidly “wires” itself at an early age. Genetics and environment predetermines this. Autistic traits often do not become apparent until age 2. If one could intercept or deflect this natural process theoretically one could stop one from becoming autistic before it happens. This is why there is so much emphasis on early detection, why people get so excited at any news story claiming autism can be detected in infants
The Neuroscience of Changing Your Behavior
Neuroplasticity is the ability of the brain to change its physical structure and function based on input from your experiences, behaviors, emotions, and even thoughts. It used to be believed that except for a few specific growth periods in childhood, the brain was pretty much fixed. Now, we know that’s not true. Your brain is capable of change until the day you die.
Your brain forms neuronal connections based on what you do repeatedly in your life – both good and bad
Diagnosing Infants 6 to 18 months of age
Currently the official diagnoses of autism aren't usually given until kids reach age 2 or 3. But parents can be on the lookout for signs much sooner. Early discovery and intervention can make a huge difference, so be aware of any delays your infant is experiencing and discuss them with your pediatrician.
_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity
“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman
Are you just trying to invalidate one of the standard science tools?
It's a tool employed when there is a lack of resources to conduct a major primary study so improvisation is employed by sourcing data from "similar" studies. It's not the gold standard of research.
Tell me you're kidding... or give a really strong source to support this statement.
_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.
<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>
Here's a seminal paper on meta-analysis by Hans Eysenk, one of the most famous psychologists in the area of intelligence and personality
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7950571
His critique of meta-analysis is accurate
Did you read the whole article: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articl ... 8-0043.pdf or just the abstract?
The article comes from quite an interesting time when psychologists were starting to use scientific tools for psychology but did not yet developed scientifically rigurous methods of aquiring data.
This is taken into account in modern metaanalytical studies.
Good critique in science often leads to improvement. It happened here.
_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.
<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>
Because the ones I read concluded that the broader definition of autism, the higher correlation to genetics.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4996332/
There is genetics, and there is epigenetics.
https://www.spectrumnews.org/news/twin-study-finds-epigenetic-imprint-of-autism-traits/
Frankly, given sufficient keywords, it is YOUR responsibility to find the references, especially for such a well-known subject. Otherwise you don't qualify as a scientist. Do you see me asking for references?
You may want to take a look at my "orchestra model" of autism. It illustrates the polygenic nature of autism and the effect of epigenetics.
https://wrongplanet.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=361583&start=35
Last edited by eikonabridge on 03 Jun 2019, 8:53 am, edited 2 times in total.
When someone says "scientists say" or "research shows", I ask for actual link to the publication.
If "being given sufficient keywords" was supposed to be enough, what would we need references for?
Do you really think of it as unreasonable?
If someone pointed to a study that escaped my attention, I would be more than happy!
By the way, the study you linked is not in disagreement with what I have digged, as they measure particular autism traits - speech delay and communicative behaviors - that may be not present in BAP.
_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.
<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>
I think what Eikonabridge is trying to say Magz is that it's your responsibility to check the scientific validity of meta-analysis rather than blindly accepting it because it's been published in a journal.
Journals also accept case studies, qualitative research, review articles and opinion pieces that doesn't mean they all have the same level of scholarship. I know about flaws in Meta-analyses because I have been a researcher in my past. They have problems with internal and external validity. The findings meta-analysis are only mean't to be a preliminary work in progress (not proof) and require further research ideally with primary data to properly quantify any predictive models generated the first time.
We got way too far off topic.
I linked one article, with the metaanalysys, because it takes the most data together and it's recent. Wanna other publications if you don't like metaanalyses?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5818813/
https://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/fu ... .161.3.539
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaps ... ct/1107328
It was my response to your
I gave my best, most recent knowledge on twin studies on autism and their results:
The broader definition of autism, the higher influence of genetic factor.
So, if one day a genetic test for autism is created, it most likely wouldn't be able to tell severe autism from Asperger's from BAP.
_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.
<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>
The broader definition of autism, the higher influence of genetic factor.
So, if one day a genetic test for autism is created, it most likely wouldn't be able to tell severe autism from Asperger's from BAP.
I think this is likely that when/if genes are mapped for autism that parents will probably opt to terminate regardless because of the lottery of ending up with a child who will never be normal in their eyes.
The broader definition of autism, the higher influence of genetic factor.
So, if one day a genetic test for autism is created, it most likely wouldn't be able to tell severe autism from Asperger's from BAP.
I think this is likely that when/if genes are mapped for autism that parents will probably opt to terminate regardless because of the lottery of ending up with a child who will never be normal in their eyes.
I would call it a very consumptionist attitude towards parenting.
_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.
<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>
The broader definition of autism, the higher influence of genetic factor.
So, if one day a genetic test for autism is created, it most likely wouldn't be able to tell severe autism from Asperger's from BAP.
I think this is likely that when/if genes are mapped for autism that parents will probably opt to terminate regardless because of the lottery of ending up with a child who will never be normal in their eyes.
I would call it a very consumptionist attitude towards parenting.
Tell that to the 95% of parents who terminate a downs syndrome baby when they get their amniocentesis results
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Do you have a nice laugh |
16 Nov 2024, 12:53 am |
Nice article about Daryl Hannah |
22 Nov 2024, 6:39 pm |
Shared special interests is nice |
06 Jan 2025, 4:50 am |
Random Discussion - Parents |
31 Dec 2024, 6:23 pm |