George Zimmerman sues Trayvon Martin's family
cyberdad wrote:
Persephone29 wrote:
There were two things I always got from this case:
2. Trayvon Martin was up to no good.
.
2. Trayvon Martin was up to no good.
.
According to the police and prosecuters - The teen (Martin), was unarmed and wearing a hoodie, was returning from a store with Skittles and a drink.
Yep...add the fact he was black in an all white neighbourhood and you gotta agree he's really up to no good....

I actually agree with you (for once). It's like some people are assuming that he deserved to be killed because he was black and dressed like a young thug. Which I agree is BS. Just like it's BS that Zimmerman is suing the family of his victim.
However the media itself pretty much twisted the facts around to make this seem like another case of a racist white devil (who was not actually white) murdering a black kid as a way of saying "Look how evil white people are! This why you should vote Democrat!"
_________________
♡ The Hearts teach us to feel pleasure and pain.
◇ The Diamonds teach us to enjoy that we gain.
♧ The Clubs teach us to work the goals we aim.
♤ The Spades teach us to conquer all we claim.
cyberdad wrote:
Persephone29 wrote:
There were two things I always got from this case:
2. Trayvon Martin was up to no good.
.
2. Trayvon Martin was up to no good.
.
According to the police and prosecuters - The teen (Martin), was unarmed and wearing a hoodie, was returning from a store with Skittles and a drink.
Yep...add the fact he was black in an all white neighbourhood and you gotta agree he's really up to no good....

According to the residents there had been breakins and a string of attempted breakins, which had them all on 'high alert.' Zimmerman was out of line by watching everyone and turning vigilante... talk about a set up to go to jail. I take everything out of my car, but if it got broken into I guess I'd see how much it would raise my premiums to file a claim, after filing a police report. I don't see the wisdom in taking a stand to leave things in my car, only to have someone see them and break my car window. I'm the loser. But, some people don't feel that way. They may even intentionally leave things, so they can watch and catch would be criminals. I think that's what Zimmerman was doing, I think he was lying in wait. But, they couldn't prove it. Unfortunately for Martin, he was guilty of looking suspicious in an area that had recent breakins. And, I also think he was up to no good.
No one ever seems to ask themselves if they would do the same thing, under the same circumstances. A young resident of the same complex knows there have been breakins. Why go wandering through the parking lot armed with a pack of skittles and a soda? Especially considering how afraid most blacks claim to be of cops, violence, etc... That's just not sound. People who are afraid don't go wandering at night, at least I don't.
_________________
Disagreeing with you doesn't mean I hate you, it just means we disagree.
Neurocognitive exam in May 2019, diagnosed with ASD, Asperger's type in June 2019.
There was also some evidence that Martin may have been involved with some of said break-ins (tools and a bag of unexplained women's jewelry) among his possessions.
_________________
I'm bored out of my skull, let's play a different game. Let's pay a visit down below and cast the world in flame.
ASPartOfMe wrote:
NBC News
Quote:
[...]
George Zimmerman claims in a lawsuit filed by his lawyer, conservative nonprofit Judicial Watch founder Larry Klayman
George Zimmerman claims in a lawsuit filed by his lawyer, conservative nonprofit Judicial Watch founder Larry Klayman
Larry Klayman has a long history of filing all manner of frivolous lawsuits. I don't understand why he hasn't been disbarred.
_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.
Wolfram87 wrote:
There was also some evidence that Martin may have been involved with some of said break-ins (tools and a bag of unexplained women's jewelry) among his possessions.
Persephone29 wrote:
Why go wandering through the parking lot armed with a pack of skittles and a soda? Especially considering how afraid most blacks claim to be of cops, violence, etc... That's just not sound. People who are afraid don't go wandering at night, at least I don't.
Both your posts lack one vital thing....evidence! My understanding is that there was no evidence Trayvon Martin was carrying anything suspicious or he was involved in any criminal activity or acting suspicious when Zimmerman launched himself on the teen.
Walking in public while being black in a predominantly white/hispanic neighbourhood does not warrant vigilante action last time I checked.
If you have evidence to the contrary I am happy to be corrected..................
Mona Pereth wrote:
ASPartOfMe wrote:
NBC News
Quote:
[...]
George Zimmerman claims in a lawsuit filed by his lawyer, conservative nonprofit Judicial Watch founder Larry Klayman
George Zimmerman claims in a lawsuit filed by his lawyer, conservative nonprofit Judicial Watch founder Larry Klayman
Larry Klayman has a long history of filing all manner of frivolous lawsuits. I don't understand why he hasn't been disbarred.
A attention seeking conservative lawyer of the same ilk as Nick Sandmann's "ambulance chasing" lawyer L. Lin Wood
cyberdad wrote:
Wolfram87 wrote:
There was also some evidence that Martin may have been involved with some of said break-ins (tools and a bag of unexplained women's jewelry) among his possessions.
Persephone29 wrote:
Why go wandering through the parking lot armed with a pack of skittles and a soda? Especially considering how afraid most blacks claim to be of cops, violence, etc... That's just not sound. People who are afraid don't go wandering at night, at least I don't.
Both your posts lack one vital thing....evidence! My understanding is that there was no evidence Trayvon Martin was carrying anything suspicious or he was involved in any criminal activity or acting suspicious when Zimmerman launched himself on the teen.
Walking in public while being black in a predominantly white/hispanic neighbourhood does not warrant vigilante action last time I checked.
If you have evidence to the contrary I am happy to be corrected..................
My point was not that it warranted vigilante justice, it was just that it wasn't very smart. There had been breakins, why draw suspicion? Especially when they believe just that, "being black in a white/hispanic" neighborhood... It's a self fulfilling prophecy.
Okay, I'm black. Let me go wandering around in a parking lot where there have been breakins, maybe ones they think I'm involved in. Then, let me get shot and killed for it and be shocked.
I know the neighborhoods to avoid. Believe it or not Cyberdad, there are places where walking while white in a predominantly black neighborhood will likely get me shot, assaulted, robbed, etc... That's why I don't do it. I do have a certain responsibility to my own safety, you know?

_________________
Disagreeing with you doesn't mean I hate you, it just means we disagree.
Neurocognitive exam in May 2019, diagnosed with ASD, Asperger's type in June 2019.
Persephone29 wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Wolfram87 wrote:
There was also some evidence that Martin may have been involved with some of said break-ins (tools and a bag of unexplained women's jewelry) among his possessions.
Persephone29 wrote:
Why go wandering through the parking lot armed with a pack of skittles and a soda? Especially considering how afraid most blacks claim to be of cops, violence, etc... That's just not sound. People who are afraid don't go wandering at night, at least I don't.
Both your posts lack one vital thing....evidence! My understanding is that there was no evidence Trayvon Martin was carrying anything suspicious or he was involved in any criminal activity or acting suspicious when Zimmerman launched himself on the teen.
Walking in public while being black in a predominantly white/hispanic neighbourhood does not warrant vigilante action last time I checked.
If you have evidence to the contrary I am happy to be corrected..................
My point was not that it warranted vigilante justice, it was just that it wasn't very smart. There had been breakins, why draw suspicion? Especially when they believe just that, "being black in a white/hispanic" neighborhood... It's a self fulfilling prophecy.
Okay, I'm black. Let me go wandering around in a parking lot where there have been breakins, maybe ones they think I'm involved in. Then, let me get shot and killed for it and be shocked.
I know the neighborhoods to avoid. Believe it or not Cyberdad, there are places where walking while white in a predominantly black neighborhood will likely get me shot, assaulted, robbed, etc... That's why I don't do it. I do have a certain responsibility to my own safety, you know?

Wow! so he living in in his father's fiancee's house in Miami Gardens and felt hungry so walked to the local corner shop to buy a drink and skittles?
I don't get it? what has he done wrong??
cyberdad wrote:
Both your posts lack one vital thing....evidence! My understanding is that there was no evidence Trayvon Martin was carrying anything suspicious or he was involved in any criminal activity or acting suspicious when Zimmerman launched himself on the teen.
Reading more into it, the jewelry pertained to a previous incident where Martin was suspended from school, not the shooting.
As for launching himself at anyone, it was my understanding that he was trying to follow Martin (again, after being told not to) but that he was spotted, and that it was Martin who initiated violence. If he had stopped at just beating the s**t out of Zimmerman, I'd be fine with it (and the media would probably call it an antisemitic hate crime), but from what I understand he escalated to pretty deadly force, banging Zimmermans head in the sidewalk and that it was at this point Zimmerman got out his pistol and fired.
cyberdad wrote:
Walking in public while being black in a predominantly white/hispanic neighbourhood does not warrant vigilante action last time I checked.
Moving right along from the "all-white" neighbourhood claim, I see. And I don't think anyone is trying to justify what happened, but you'd have to be an idiot not to see that that the racial narrative spun from this case holds no water. Zimmerman is not an example of your average white person (not even actually being white) sitting at home caressing a pistol and waiting to spot innocent black people out alone at night so he can murder them in self defense, and Martin was not an innocent little angel who was targeted by an evil white supremacist.
_________________
I'm bored out of my skull, let's play a different game. Let's pay a visit down below and cast the world in flame.
cyberdad wrote:
Persephone29 wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Wolfram87 wrote:
There was also some evidence that Martin may have been involved with some of said break-ins (tools and a bag of unexplained women's jewelry) among his possessions.
Persephone29 wrote:
Why go wandering through the parking lot armed with a pack of skittles and a soda? Especially considering how afraid most blacks claim to be of cops, violence, etc... That's just not sound. People who are afraid don't go wandering at night, at least I don't.
Both your posts lack one vital thing....evidence! My understanding is that there was no evidence Trayvon Martin was carrying anything suspicious or he was involved in any criminal activity or acting suspicious when Zimmerman launched himself on the teen.
Walking in public while being black in a predominantly white/hispanic neighbourhood does not warrant vigilante action last time I checked.
If you have evidence to the contrary I am happy to be corrected..................
My point was not that it warranted vigilante justice, it was just that it wasn't very smart. There had been breakins, why draw suspicion? Especially when they believe just that, "being black in a white/hispanic" neighborhood... It's a self fulfilling prophecy.
Okay, I'm black. Let me go wandering around in a parking lot where there have been breakins, maybe ones they think I'm involved in. Then, let me get shot and killed for it and be shocked.
I know the neighborhoods to avoid. Believe it or not Cyberdad, there are places where walking while white in a predominantly black neighborhood will likely get me shot, assaulted, robbed, etc... That's why I don't do it. I do have a certain responsibility to my own safety, you know?

Wow! so he living in in his father's fiancee's house in Miami Gardens and felt hungry so walked to the local corner shop to buy a drink and skittles?
I don't get it? what has he done wrong??
You're doing it again, Cyberdad. I believe he was up to no good, but that's beside the point I'm trying to make here. What I am saying here is that if you believe that walking while black in a predominantly white/hispanic (your words) neighborhood is dangerous, why do it? Nothing on this earth would possess me to walk while white in a predominantly black/hispanic neighborhood for a pack of skittles. It's dumb, it's dangerous. He's 17, can't he drive? Did his step-mom who lived in the predominantly white/hispanic complex drive? Did she think it was dangerous...? It's Miami, why in the hell do you need a flash-light? I live in po-dunk, I don't need a flash light to walk around my block.
The problem is that you absolutely refuse to entertain the idea that we all must take some personal responsibility for our safety. My priest always said that a lot of bad happens in the dark. Why test his theory? The minor was suspended from school and allowed out wandering around late. Who thinks this is the proper way to look after a minor? I just called the cops on my granddaughter for getting the bright idea to walk out in broad daylight, without supervision. She's kinda brownish, but still. It's not safe for any minor.
_________________
Disagreeing with you doesn't mean I hate you, it just means we disagree.
Neurocognitive exam in May 2019, diagnosed with ASD, Asperger's type in June 2019.
People have the right to wander into any neighborhood they please.
Still, it’s not smart to go into hostile territory....especially if there isn’t anything that would attract you to the area, per se.
Trayvon should have been on punishment for being suspended from school.
He seems like he was up to no good.
He shouldn’t have been killed, though.
By the way, Zimmerman is no saint, either.....
kraftiekortie wrote:
People have the right to wander into any neighborhood they please.
Still, it’s not smart to go into hostile territory....especially if there isn’t anything that would attract you to the area, per se.
Trayvon should have been on punishment for being suspended from school.
He seems like he was up to no good.
He shouldn’t have been killed, though.
By the way, Zimmerman is no saint, either.....
Still, it’s not smart to go into hostile territory....especially if there isn’t anything that would attract you to the area, per se.
Trayvon should have been on punishment for being suspended from school.
He seems like he was up to no good.
He shouldn’t have been killed, though.
By the way, Zimmerman is no saint, either.....
I agree. I have the right to go wandering. But, do I really want to roll the dice on who I might meet while exercising that right? Or, what they might do to me? It's great to be free, just because I can doesn't mean I should. That's just me, it's stood me in good stead though.
_________________
Disagreeing with you doesn't mean I hate you, it just means we disagree.
Neurocognitive exam in May 2019, diagnosed with ASD, Asperger's type in June 2019.
Persephone29 wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Wolfram87 wrote:
There was also some evidence that Martin may have been involved with some of said break-ins (tools and a bag of unexplained women's jewelry) among his possessions.
Persephone29 wrote:
Why go wandering through the parking lot armed with a pack of skittles and a soda? Especially considering how afraid most blacks claim to be of cops, violence, etc... That's just not sound. People who are afraid don't go wandering at night, at least I don't.
Both your posts lack one vital thing....evidence! My understanding is that there was no evidence Trayvon Martin was carrying anything suspicious or he was involved in any criminal activity or acting suspicious when Zimmerman launched himself on the teen.
Walking in public while being black in a predominantly white/hispanic neighbourhood does not warrant vigilante action last time I checked.
If you have evidence to the contrary I am happy to be corrected..................
My point was not that it warranted vigilante justice, it was just that it wasn't very smart. There had been breakins, why draw suspicion? Especially when they believe just that, "being black in a white/hispanic" neighborhood... It's a self fulfilling prophecy.
Okay, I'm black. Let me go wandering around in a parking lot where there have been breakins, maybe ones they think I'm involved in. Then, let me get shot and killed for it and be shocked.
I know the neighborhoods to avoid. Believe it or not Cyberdad, there are places where walking while white in a predominantly black neighborhood will likely get me shot, assaulted, robbed, etc... That's why I don't do it. I do have a certain responsibility to my own safety, you know?

Refer to Krafties response...members of the public should be allowed to walk in public...Miami Gardens is a residential area, it's not the "hood"
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Arctic Warrior Guy Martin's |
16 Dec 2024, 12:03 pm |
George Santos Gets Delay In Sentencing So He Can Make More P |
13 Jan 2025, 7:31 pm |
The whole dang family is sick! |
18 Feb 2025, 11:47 am |
Should spending the holidays with a family and husband be... |
25 Dec 2024, 9:32 pm |