White man and woman deface Black Lives Matter mural in CA.
I wonder if these topics are considered racist
because the media is more into white people than black children shot yesterday, today, tomorrow.
Secoriea Turner, 8, was shot and killed.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/05/us/atlan ... index.html
All killed last weekend ...
https://www.foxnews.com/us/fourth-of-ju ... -shootings
_________________
Then a hero comes along, with the strength to carry on, and you cast your fears aside, and you know you can survive.
Be the hero of your life.
As above: the key word here being "mostly". I don't particularly care for the Confederate statues, especially not the later ones (don't know if there are any contemporaneous ones). You may well petition to have them removed, or whatever other means there are to accomplish such a thing. You do not have the right to just go and destroy them just because you have decided that it so offends you that it grants you this right by the sheer force of your moral outrage.
The attacking of statues of people like Baldwin and Douglass just makes it look like these people are either useful, ignorant idiots who don't actually know what they're fighting for or against, or that they're after tearing down a lot more than what they claim.
To those wearing some seriously rose-tinted goggles, I'm sure that's the case. To plenty of other people it's a symbol of violent far-left wannabe revolutionaries with some seriously creepy ethno-state ideas. The founders being self-described "trained Marxists" and the agenda having somehow shifted from fighting police brutality to fighting capitalism further reinforces that sense.
If you can’t/don’t see it that way, I’d actually like to hear your take on it.
I get what you're saying, I just don't agree with it. It's an argument from principle. If there's a statue you don't like, there are ways to have it removed, but it's not your decision alone. There is no "but I'm really REALLY offended"-excemption from this. Should you then deprive other people a say in the matter and proceed to destroy said statue yourself, you have lowered the bar for acceptable behaviour. So when someone vandalizes your mural, there is no hiding behind "but it's public property", there is no "but we had a permit". There is only "but we're good and you're bad!". And that's not good enough.
If you look around some, I'm sure you can find someone at CNN assuring us that these were "mostly peaceful" shootings.
_________________
I'm bored out of my skull, let's play a different game. Let's pay a visit down below and cast the world in flame.
goldfish21
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16567/16567f88f32735d0a5ed725b9a067848ac85faf6" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Lol what are you expecting? Black people to file a petition politely asking their white supremacist government to kindly take down symbols of white supremacy? Lolololol I understand, and support, fully why they’re angrily taking action and toppling them.
And if that’s your perception of BLM you’re either extremely racist, mentally unstable, or both. IMO. Because that is not what BLM is.
_________________
No
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5cd82/5cd82353baa0bf996f50ce03ab52d56df58ee252" alt="Heart :heart:"
funeralxempire
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e52d0/e52d0b758ba61c59d6ff6bff0ec5c60a1c0e9623" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 30,618
Location: Right over your left shoulder
An over-enthusiastic ignoramus?
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
They have a name for Nazis that were only Nazis because of economic anxiety or similar issues. They're called Nazis.
funeralxempire
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e52d0/e52d0b758ba61c59d6ff6bff0ec5c60a1c0e9623" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 30,618
Location: Right over your left shoulder
Are we pretending that he's representative of who's monuments have been targeted?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6af0/a6af0253fc47f52f9e58caa950ec8811f1975586" alt="Confused :?"
If you're on a crusade against monuments to racism, should it not be encumbent on you to make sure to actually target such monuments, rather than making excuses like "well, most of the stuff we destroyed was racist, so it's ok"?
Marxists or the founder of the Klan. One is a murderous and racist nutjob, and one is a bunch of followers of a historically genocidal ideology. Not great options, and not really a choice I feel compelled to make. But being morally outraged by one and tearing it down because of it does not save you from being a massive hypocrite when you whine about people morally objecting to your mural and vandalizing that.
Since when were BLM Marxists and since when were Marxists genocidal? You seem to be making s**t up to avoid conceding that you're objectively wrong to compare a BLM mural to confederate monuments.
Considering I had nothing to do with the destruction of any statues of Frederick Douglass I don't owe anyone an apology or a defence of that action and unless you can make the case that BLM is directly responsible they don't owe anyone any comment on it either.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
They have a name for Nazis that were only Nazis because of economic anxiety or similar issues. They're called Nazis.
Then you also understand why the mural was vandalized.
If the US is such a White Supremacy nation and these people tore down the proud monuments to the beloved White Supremacy, why are they still alive? Why haven't Trumps Orangeshirts come down on them hard and crushed their feeble efforts under their lifted jackboots? Why has every athlete and every corporation with a PR department come out in favour of BLM? Or are all the Nazis just that clever?
Oh look, name calling. How quaint.
https://thepostmillennial.com/brands-wi ... m-hijacked
https://medium.com/marleyisms/hijacked- ... 53519c3178
FXE: "since when have BLM been Marxist?"
BLM Founder: "We actually do have an ideological framework...we are trained Marxists"
FXE: *surprised Pikachu-face*
As for when Marxists have been genocidal; have you been paying atttention? Ever?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_kill ... st_regimes
"Objectively wrong to compare..." Did you just call your own moral judgement objectively right?
For the record, I support neither the statues nor the destroyers thereof, but if the name of the game is to destroy symbols of views and agendas that one finds morally objectionable then the two are eminently comparable.
_________________
I'm bored out of my skull, let's play a different game. Let's pay a visit down below and cast the world in flame.
funeralxempire
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e52d0/e52d0b758ba61c59d6ff6bff0ec5c60a1c0e9623" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 30,618
Location: Right over your left shoulder
Then you also understand why the mural was vandalized.
If the US is such a White Supremacy nation and these people tore down the proud monuments to the beloved White Supremacy, why are they still alive? Why haven't Trumps Orangeshirts come down on them hard and crushed their feeble efforts under their lifted jackboots? Why has every athlete and every corporation with a PR department come out in favour of BLM? Or are all the Nazis just that clever?
Oh look, name calling. How quaint.
https://thepostmillennial.com/brands-wi ... m-hijacked
https://medium.com/marleyisms/hijacked- ... 53519c3178
FXE: "since when have BLM been Marxist?"
BLM Founder: "We actually do have an ideological framework...we are trained Marxists"
FXE: *surprised Pikachu-face*
As for when Marxists have been genocidal; have you been paying atttention? Ever?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_kill ... st_regimes
"Objectively wrong to compare..." Did you just call your own moral judgement objectively right?
For the record, I support neither the statues nor the destroyers thereof, but if the name of the game is to destroy symbols of views and agendas that one finds morally objectionable then the two are eminently comparable.
For starters, while many Leninist regimes have engaged in democide, the majority of those acts weren't motivated by ethnicity and thus don't meet the definition of genocide.
I'm aware that the founders of BLM have ideological positions beyond anti-racism, that said one doesn't need to be a Marxist (or even a socialist, not that all socialists are Marxists) in order to be involved.
Is that the entirety of your argument? Because so far you haven't supported your claims to the extent you might believe you have.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
They have a name for Nazis that were only Nazis because of economic anxiety or similar issues. They're called Nazis.
[MOD]
A brief note on aggressive hypotheticals, negative characterisations of intangible groups, etc.
To those wearing some seriously rose-tinted goggles, I'm sure that's the case.
This is absolutely fine, and I bring it up here only to serve as a contrast. "You are wearing rose-tinted glasses" means "you are being optimistic" or "you are being positively biased". It might technically be a "personal attack" by some definitions, but it is hardly an "attack" at all, particularly as it focuses on the views being held (although admittedly that is perhaps slightly clouded by the metaphor).
This is not fine. Although it is couched in a hypothetical, it is a very pointed hypothetical and it serves as an attack on a person, not their view. Both the accusations - "extremely racist" and "mentally unstable" - are greater slurs than "rose-tinted glasses". It may or may not be fair, in some situations, to describe a view as "extremely racist", but WrongPlanet users should focus on the view and not the holder of it. It would generally be conducive to good conversation to explain precisely why a view is racist (how does it discriminate based on race?).
Please avoid personal attacks on other users. Again, focus on views, not people, and don't try to get around the restriction on personal attacks by couching comments in thin hypotheticals.
goldfish21
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16567/16567f88f32735d0a5ed725b9a067848ac85faf6" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 17 Feb 2013
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 22,612
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
These two losers were charged with hate crimes:
https://www.tmz.com/2020/07/07/trump-su ... -martinez/
_________________
No
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5cd82/5cd82353baa0bf996f50ce03ab52d56df58ee252" alt="Heart :heart:"
because the media is more into white people than black children shot yesterday, today, tomorrow.
Secoriea Turner, 8, was shot and killed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba3e0/ba3e0c81976a02900c769d95f78d08997d62fe36" alt="Image"
https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/05/us/atlan ... index.html
All killed last weekend ...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3231a/3231ad45a51e54d6176ddee5a224d99c8b2ce1c8" alt="Image"
https://www.foxnews.com/us/fourth-of-ju ... -shootings
Why are they considered racist topics?
Then you also understand why the mural was vandalized.
If the US is such a White Supremacy nation and these people tore down the proud monuments to the beloved White Supremacy, why are they still alive? Why haven't Trumps Orangeshirts come down on them hard and crushed their feeble efforts under their lifted jackboots? Why has every athlete and every corporation with a PR department come out in favour of BLM? Or are all the Nazis just that clever?
Oh look, name calling. How quaint.
https://thepostmillennial.com/brands-wi ... m-hijacked
https://medium.com/marleyisms/hijacked- ... 53519c3178
FXE: "since when have BLM been Marxist?"
BLM Founder: "We actually do have an ideological framework...we are trained Marxists"
FXE: *surprised Pikachu-face*
As for when Marxists have been genocidal; have you been paying atttention? Ever?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_kill ... st_regimes
"Objectively wrong to compare..." Did you just call your own moral judgement objectively right?
For the record, I support neither the statues nor the destroyers thereof, but if the name of the game is to destroy symbols of views and agendas that one finds morally objectionable then the two are eminently comparable.
I'm aware that the founders of BLM have ideological positions beyond anti-racism, that said one doesn't need to be a Marxist (or even a socialist, not that all socialists are Marxists) in order to be involved.
It's strange that this line of reasoning is favored by you as a defence for BLM, who I would guess you support, and not for other groups of people with who you disagree (such as conservatives, right wing people, or Trump supporters)... Any chance of some consistency?
funeralxempire
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e52d0/e52d0b758ba61c59d6ff6bff0ec5c60a1c0e9623" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 30,618
Location: Right over your left shoulder
Whining that the founders are socialists really isn't a worthwhile criticism, so it's not even something I'm defending them against. Socialism isn't even inherently a bad thing.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
They have a name for Nazis that were only Nazis because of economic anxiety or similar issues. They're called Nazis.
Whining that the founders are socialists really isn't a worthwhile criticism, so it's not even something I'm defending them against. Socialism isn't even inherently a bad thing.
I was referring more to your use of "Just because the founders have certain viewpoints doesn't mean you need to share these to be involved" with regards to a group on one side of the political spectrum, and yet automatically assume those involved in a group on the other side of the political spectrum share all (or at least the worst) beliefs you can associate with the leaders (or even a small subset of the members) of that group...
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1390b/1390bfdce73636f9b999b108ddd97ba2f65b9007" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,766
Location: Long Island, New York
Black Lives Matter co-founder describes herself as ‘trained Marxist’
Cullors, 36, was the protégé of Eric Mann, former agitator of the Weather Underground domestic terror organization, and spent years absorbing the Marxist-Leninist ideology that shaped her worldview, Breitbart News reported.
“The first thing, I think, is that we actually do have an ideological frame. Myself and Alicia in particular are trained organizers,” she said, referring to BLM co-founder Alicia Garza.
“We are trained Marxists. We are super-versed on, sort of, ideological theories. And I think that what we really tried to do is build a movement that could be utilized by many, many black folk,” Cullors added in the interview with Jared Ball of The Real News Network.
While promoting her book “When They Call You a Terrorist: A Black Lives Matter Memoir” in 2018, Cullors described her introduction to and support for Marxist ideology.
She described to Democracy Now! how she became a trained organizer with the Labor/Community Strategy Center, which she called her “first political home” under the mentorship of Mann, its director, Breitbart reported.
The center, which describes its philosophy as “an urban experiment,” uses grassroots organization to “focus on Black and Latino communities with deep historical ties to the long history of anti-colonial, anti-imperialist, pro-communist resistance to the US empire,” according to the outlet.
It also expresses its appreciation for the work of the US Communist Party, “especially Black communists,” as well as its support for “the great work of the Black Panther Party, the American Indian Movement, Young Lords, Brown Berets, and the great revolutionary rainbow experiments of the 1970s,” Breitbart reported.
In 1968, Mann was a coordinator for Students for a Democratic Society, from which a more radical wing –- the Weather Underground — was splintered the following year.
It was led by Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, who called for “direct action” over civil disobedience, seeking the overthrow of the US government. In 1969, the FBI classified the group as a domestic terror organization.
Mann was eventually charged with assault and battery, disturbing the peace, damaging property, defacing a building and disturbing a public assembly, for which he spent 18 months behind bars.
_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity
“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Time-Lapse of 1st Black Hole Reveals How Matter Swirls Aroun |
25 Jan 2025, 7:13 pm |
Does it matter I don't use Instagram or tiktok? |
13 Feb 2025, 7:16 pm |
What makes autistics happy and living good lives? |
14 Dec 2024, 5:50 am |
White House preparing executive order to abolish DOE |
04 Feb 2025, 2:02 pm |