Stimshieme wrote:
All in all atheists are really gremlin like, they can critisize your beliefs but none of their own. Seems like angry teenage attitudes to me that have evolved throughout - if you aren't careful - into adulthood. At some point in life I've read atheists begin believing again.
Way to stereotype.
I would probably consider myself an atheist, but I would not actively seek people who hold religious beliefs and tell them that I'm right and they're wrong. That's hypocritical. And I'm sure I've got lots of things wrong, I would not deny that.
However, believing in a God, or any supernatural being, just doesn't do it for me. Consider the Bible. Genesis says that God created the world and the entire Universe in 6 days, and using the genealogy given in the Bible, the world can be worked out to be around 6,000 years old. According to the Big Bang Theory, the Universe was formed around 13.7 billion years ago, with planet Earth forming 4.54 bya (billion years ago.) As far as is known, life began to appear about 3.5 bya. These two theories are pretty much incompatible, which leaves you with three options:
1) The Bible is right, the Big Bang theory and Evolution are wrong.
2) The Big Bang theory and Evolution is right and the literal interpretation of the Bible is wrong.
3) Both are wrong.
Now, I find it hard to believe in a being/force that nobody has ever seen, and to reject the ideas of mainstream science in the process. Maybe there is a way of reconciling science and religion, by accepting that some parts of the Bible cannot be taken literally, but in that case, the Bible loses much of its power. What other parts of it have to be taken metaphorically? I won't even go into the whole issue of the existence of thousands of different creation stories from across the world.
So if you hold religious beliefs, great. But please don't stereotype atheists.
_________________
"Never try to teach a pig to sing. It wastes your time and annoys the pig."