transgender student OKed for locker room access

Page 13 of 13 [ 206 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13

wilburforce
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Sep 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,940

31 Dec 2015, 1:11 am

Edenthiel wrote:
nurseangela wrote:
I'm done with this topic. Transgender people are going to believe what they want and the same goes for me. It doesn't matter what is said, I will never say what happened in this courtcase is ok. That doesn't make me ignorant, it doesn't make me a transgenderphobe, or that I hate anyone for being transgender - it means that I have a different opinion from what some of you have here.


No, it *does* mean you are ignorant about this particular variation of human sexual development. Fortunately, if you choose that can be a temporary condition. As has been pointed out, as a health care professional you have a responsibility to learn about such things. Please do so. Your expressed sentiment is no different than a nurse half a century ago refusing to learn that people of other races are indeed still people and deserve the same level of care. It's no different than a nurse a hundred years ago *refusing* to learn about epilepsy and instead continue to insist that the patient was possessed by a demon, because the Bible says so.

Please, learn the science and medicine of what we are all discussing. See if you have access to PubMed. Start with Zhou, et all and work your way forward. Here are the highlights from the last 20 years:

Jiang-Ning Zhou et al., A sex difference in the human brain and its relation to transsexuality, 378 , Published online: 02 November 1995; | doi:10.1038/378068a0 68–70 (1995)

Milton Diamond, Biased-Interaction Theory of Psychosexual Development: “How Does One Know if One is Male or Female?,” 55 Sex Roles 589–600 (2006)

H. E H. Pol et al., Changing your sex changes your brain: influences of testosterone and estrogen on adult human brain structure, 155 European Journal of Endocrinology S107–S114 (2006)

Kenneth J. Zucker & Anne A. Lawrence, Epidemiology of Gender Identity Disorder: Recommendations for the Standards of Care of the World Professional Association for Transgender Health, 11 International Journal of Transgenderism 8–18 (2009)

Heino Meyer-Bahlburg, From Mental Disorder to Iatrogenic Hypogonadism: Dilemmas in Conceptualizing Gender Identity Variants as Psychiatric Conditions, 39 Archives of Sexual Behavior 461–476 (2010)

David L. Rowland & Luca Incrocci, Handbook of Sexual and Gender Identity Disorders (John Wiley & Sons) (2008)

Melanie Blackless et al., How sexually dimorphic are we? Review and synthesis, 12 American Journal of Human Biology 151–166 (2000)

Frank P. M. Kruijver et al., Male-to-Female Transsexuals Have Female Neuron Numbers in a Limbic Nucleus, 85 Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 2034–2041 (2000)

H. Berglund et al., Male-to-Female Transsexuals Show Sex-Atypical Hypothalamus Activation When Smelling Odorous Steroids, 18 Cerebral Cortex 1900–1908 (2008)

Sonja Schöning et al., Neuroimaging differences in spatial cognition between men and male-to-female transsexuals before and during hormone therapy, 7 The journal of sexual medicine 1858–1867 (2010)

Eileen Luders et al., Regional gray matter variation in male-to-female transsexualism, 46 NeuroImage 904–907 (2009)

Sheri A. Berenbaum & Adriene M. Beltz, Sexual differentiation of human behavior: Effects of prenatal and pubertal organizational hormones, 32 Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology 183–200 (2011)

D F Swaab, Sexual differentiation of the human brain: relevance for gender identity, transsexualism and sexual orientation, 19 Gynecological endocrinology: the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology 301–312 (2004)

Alicia Garcia-Falgueras & Dick F Swaab, Sexual hormones and the brain: an essential alliance for sexual identity and sexual orientation, 17 Endocrine development 22–35 (2010)

PENTTI K. SIITERI & JEAN D. WILSON, Testosterone formation and metabolism during male sexual differentiation in the human embryo, 38 Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 113–125 (1974)

Giuseppina Rametti et al., The microstructure of white matter in male to female transsexuals before cross-sex hormonal treatment. A DTI study, 45 Journal of Psychiatric Research 949–954 (2011)

Damian G. Zuloaga et al., The Role of Androgen Receptors in the Masculinization of Brain and Behavior: What we’ve learned from the Testicular Feminization Mutation, 53 Hormones and behavior 613–626 (2008)

P.T Cohen-Kettenis & L.J.G Gooren, Transsexualism: A review of etiology, diagnosis and treatment, 46 Journal of Psychosomatic Research 315–333 (1999)


This is my last contribution to this thread, and it's directed at Yigiren. This is from page 7 of this thread. You are either completely oblivious to reality or completely full of s**t.



LoveNotHate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,195
Location: USA

31 Dec 2015, 3:11 am

wilburforce wrote:
This is my last contribution to this thread, and it's directed at Yigiren. This is from page 7 of this thread. You are either completely oblivious to reality or completely full of s**t.

I think RoadRatt and Yigeren concede that trans people exist.

They are arguing for a physical qualification to use a sex-based locker room, not simply "identity".

For example, some people have "gender fluid identites". Today they may desire to use the men's locker room, tomorrow the women's locker room. Are you OK with simply "identity" or do you agree with RoadRatt and Yigeren that there must be some physical qualification?



Yigeren
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,606
Location: United States

31 Dec 2015, 7:09 am

LoveNotHate wrote:
wilburforce wrote:
This is my last contribution to this thread, and it's directed at Yigiren. This is from page 7 of this thread. You are either completely oblivious to reality or completely full of s**t.

I think RoadRatt and Yigeren concede that trans people exist.

They are arguing for a physical qualification to use a sex-based locker room, not simply "identity".

For example, some people have "gender fluid identites". Today they may desire to use the men's locker room, tomorrow the women's locker room. Are you OK with simply "identity" or do you agree with RoadRatt and Yigeren that there must be some physical qualification?


Yes, I have never once said trans people don't exist! I said they aren't the same thing as cisgender person. I don't see how that is controversial. I feel as a cisgender female I have my own unique life experiences that are being totally minimized, and discarded as being nothing significant or worth caring about, because it's not popular opinion.

There is no real agreed upon test to determine who is really trans gender, or who qualifies, if pre-op, or pre-hormone people count, or if gender fluid people count. I do not like the idea that someone could just announce one day "I'm transgender" and use the ladies room with no questions asked. There ought to be sort of process to go through at the very least.

People here are arguing against things that I'm not even saying.

And I have in the past already researched this stuff, including things about intersex people and their life experiences, and homosexuality and the biological origins, just because it was one of my interests. And yes, I know intersex people and homosexual people are not the same thing as trans people.



TheInfinityGap
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2015
Posts: 26
Location: Bangor

31 Dec 2015, 8:32 am

The problem with devising a "test" for trans people to use a specific locker room (aside from it being hella creepy) is that it would be discrimination. For it not to be discrimination would mean that cis people too must be tested, just to be sure that they are not "undeclared trans" - many trans people "pass" as cisgendered, and sometimes don't use locker rooms until they "pass" out of fear of attack. From the cis people I've spoken to, there are very few of them who would feel comfortable undergoing a test to confirm their gender.

You may not be comfortable with the fact that someone could say they were transgender without proof, but I don't think anyone is comfortable with the alternative, which could include a genital check/DNA test/blood hormone test/having to send a letter from your doctor/birth certificate to every gym/school/swimming pool/etc declaring that you are cisgender/transgender. And as I've said before, there is no evidence that allowing transwomen to enter the changing rooms they need is dangerous.

TheInfinityGap wrote:
Not only that, but "there has never been a verifiable reported instance of a trans person harassing a cisgender person, nor have there been any confirmed reports of male predators 'pretending' to be transgender to gain access to women's spaces and commit crimes against them." (http://mic.com/articles/114066/statistics-show-exactly-how-many-times-trans-people-have-attacked-you-in-bathrooms#.97925EYkh) No attack on a woman in a public bathroom has involved someone pretending to be trans.


(also, you told me that what i was feeling didn't mean it was necessarily real, so you kind of did say I didn't exist. :P)

Yigeren wrote:
It may make you feel better to call yourself whatever you feel that you are, but it doesn't make it true.


And you never did say whether you were comfortable changing in the same room as me. Given that a physical test would put me firmly in the women's changing room, despite my male charactaristics, are you certain that this is the route you want to go down?


_________________
call me cupid. please use they/them or he/his pronouns. be warned, i struggle to read all caps.


RoadRatt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2014
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 58,107
Location: Oregon

31 Dec 2015, 5:20 pm

LoveNotHate wrote:
I think RoadRatt and Yigeren concede that trans people exist.

They are arguing for a physical qualification to use a sex-based locker room, not simply "identity".

For example, some people have "gender fluid identites". Today they may desire to use the men's locker room, tomorrow the women's locker room. Are you OK with simply "identity" or do you agree with RoadRatt and Yigeren that there must be some physical qualification?


Until we have a device that can scan everyone's head and instantly tell the gender they identify as, as far as I can see, we can only go by a physical qualification.

Though I'd further argue that even with a computer device that could tell one's gender through a simple scan that would still leave problems beyond just discomfort.

If your ok with a simple "identity" then a room for those people would be fine, as long as everyone involved agreed.

TheInfinityGap wrote:
The problem with devising a "test" for trans people to use a specific locker room (aside from it being hella creepy) is that it would be discrimination. For it not to be discrimination would mean that cis people too must be tested, just to be sure that they are not "undeclared trans" - many trans people "pass" as cisgendered, and sometimes don't use locker rooms until they "pass" out of fear of attack. From the cis people I've spoken to, there are very few of them who would feel comfortable undergoing a test to confirm their gender.

You may not be comfortable with the fact that someone could say they were transgender without proof, but I don't think anyone is comfortable with the alternative, which could include a genital check/DNA test/blood hormone test/having to send a letter from your doctor/birth certificate to every gym/school/swimming pool/etc declaring that you are cisgender/transgender. And as I've said before, there is no evidence that allowing transwomen to enter the changing rooms they need is dangerous.


No test would be needed, though that would leave it down to taking the person's word for it. But once they declared one gender they'd be stuck with it... until they repented their evil ways! :mrgreen: :wink:

With today's technology a card that could be read at the door stating one's gender identity would be a simple process, if not a bit costly. To make it fair, like you said, everyone would need to carry a card to identify their gender.

This brings up problems but still doesn't solve them all.


_________________
No power in the 'verse can stop me. - River Tam (Firefly)


Yigeren
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,606
Location: United States

31 Dec 2015, 6:33 pm

TheInfinityGap wrote:
The problem with devising a "test" for trans people to use a specific locker room (aside from it being hella creepy) is that it would be discrimination. For it not to be discrimination would mean that cis people too must be tested, just to be sure that they are not "undeclared trans" - many trans people "pass" as cisgendered, and sometimes don't use locker rooms until they "pass" out of fear of attack. From the cis people I've spoken to, there are very few of them who would feel comfortable undergoing a test to confirm their gender.

You may not be comfortable with the fact that someone could say they were transgender without proof, but I don't think anyone is comfortable with the alternative, which could include a genital check/DNA test/blood hormone test/having to send a letter from your doctor/birth certificate to every gym/school/swimming pool/etc declaring that you are cisgender/transgender. And as I've said before, there is no evidence that allowing transwomen to enter the changing rooms they need is dangerous.

TheInfinityGap wrote:
Not only that, but "there has never been a verifiable reported instance of a trans person harassing a cisgender person, nor have there been any confirmed reports of male predators 'pretending' to be transgender to gain access to women's spaces and commit crimes against them." (http://mic.com/articles/114066/statistics-show-exactly-how-many-times-trans-people-have-attacked-you-in-bathrooms#.97925EYkh) No attack on a woman in a public bathroom has involved someone pretending to be trans.


(also, you told me that what i was feeling didn't mean it was necessarily real, so you kind of did say I didn't exist. :P)

Yigeren wrote:
It may make you feel better to call yourself whatever you feel that you are, but it doesn't make it true.


And you never did say whether you were comfortable changing in the same room as me. Given that a physical test would put me firmly in the women's changing room, despite my male charactaristics, are you certain that this is the route you want to go down?


I didn't say you didn't exist. I said you can't assume that a transgender woman knows that she feels exactly the way that I do as a cisgender woman, and that they can be sure they know how we feel. That is not the same thing at all. There is no way of knowing how it feels to be anyone else but yourself. That is something that can't be argued. Unless we find a way to go into someone else's head someday, and that would be weird.

And I don't think a transgender woman is the same thing as a cisgender woman. There are differences. What happens if transwomen are suddenly allowed to compete in women's sports? Ciswomen will have no chance and might as well not try. We are weaker and reflexes aren't as fast, everything. The body does not just magically transform completely in every way. And hormones aren't going to even things up.

And as far as women's changing rooms are concerned, I think all naked people look weird and don't want to see them. I try to avoid being seen by anyone myself. Someone who appears one gender but has different parts might throw me off for a second, but probably because I wasn't used to it. And I have seen some pretty gross naked people that are probably far more disturbing to look at than a transperson. Actually I don't feel threatened at all by trans men being in a woman's changing room. I would probably think it was interesting.

Yes, I know it isn't nice to say naked people look gross to me, but they do.

And just because something hasn't yet occurred, doesn't mean it won't or can't. As culture changes, so do crimes. It's not the real trans people that you have to worry about, it's the perverts out there who will see a new opportunity.

And actually, my biggest concern is some child predator disguising himself as a transwoman to get access to kids in the women's room. There are some really awful people out there, and I will never underestimate what they will be willing to do.



Spiderpig
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,893

01 Jan 2016, 4:49 am

RoadRatt wrote:
Spiderpig wrote:
RoadRatt wrote:
We've been separating the sexes for quite a long time. It's not discrimination to do so. It's the way it's been all my life and farther back than that.


We'd been separating races for quite a long time before we stopped doing so. Was that not discrimination, then? It's the way it had been all the life of anyone commenting on the situation back then, and farther back than that.


This isn't even close to the same thing and you know it, or at least you should.


No, I don't, and it's not my responsibility to guess your point if you don't state it. Besides, someone living a hundred years ago would most likely say that you should know the argument works perfectly well and that noöne in their right mind would question that races have to be segregated.

RoadRatt wrote:
Again, under this argument we may as well not have any separation at all and everyone use the same room no matter the sex/gender because to do so would be discrimination against someone.


It's the argument you made. If it's not discrimination to separate people according to a given criterion when it has been done for a long time, including your whole life so far, then it wasn't discrimination to separate races when it was still customary. If this argument isn't legitimate, then it's still illegitimate when used to justify sex-segregation as non-discriminatory. You can't have it both ways.

RoadRatt wrote:
I'm not sure what you're saying here exactly, but if I'm reading it correctly. If you are uncomfortable sharing a locker room with people of your own sex and gender, that's your problem and no one else's. No one is forcing their sex or gender upon you under this situation that I can see.


I don't know what you mean by "forcing their sex or gender upon me". It sounds rather vague to me. How is it "my problem and noöne else's" if I'm uncomfortable changing clothes with people of my own sex, while it's "rightfully so" if others are uncomfortable doing it with someone of the opposite sex? Who gets to decide whose discomfort is worthy of enough respect to take measures to prevent it and whose isn't?


_________________
The red lake has been forgotten. A dust devil stuns you long enough to shroud forever those last shards of wisdom. The breeze rocking this forlorn wasteland whispers in your ears, “Não resta mais que uma sombra”.


TheInfinityGap
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2015
Posts: 26
Location: Bangor

01 Jan 2016, 6:10 am

Yigeren wrote:
I didn't say you didn't exist. I said you can't assume that a transgender woman knows that she feels exactly the way that I do as a cisgender woman, and that they can be sure they know how we feel. That is not the same thing at all. There is no way of knowing how it feels to be anyone else but yourself. That is something that can't be argued. Unless we find a way to go into someone else's head someday, and that would be weird.

And I don't think a transgender woman is the same thing as a cisgender woman. There are differences. What happens if transwomen are suddenly allowed to compete in women's sports? Ciswomen will have no chance and might as well not try. We are weaker and reflexes aren't as fast, everything. The body does not just magically transform completely in every way. And hormones aren't going to even things up.

And as far as women's changing rooms are concerned, I think all naked people look weird and don't want to see them. I try to avoid being seen by anyone myself. Someone who appears one gender but has different parts might throw me off for a second, but probably because I wasn't used to it. And I have seen some pretty gross naked people that are probably far more disturbing to look at than a transperson. Actually I don't feel threatened at all by trans men being in a woman's changing room. I would probably think it was interesting.

Yes, I know it isn't nice to say naked people look gross to me, but they do.

And just because something hasn't yet occurred, doesn't mean it won't or can't. As culture changes, so do crimes. It's not the real trans people that you have to worry about, it's the perverts out there who will see a new opportunity.

And actually, my biggest concern is some child predator disguising himself as a transwoman to get access to kids in the women's room. There are some really awful people out there, and I will never underestimate what they will be willing to do.


What I'm trying to say is that cisgender women do not all think the same, and neither do trans women. We are all in our own heads, with differing thoughts and opinions. We have different experiences certainly, but who is to say trans women don't have that same instinctual connection to being female as cis women? You said it yourself, we only know how it is to feel ourselves, so how are you so absolutely certain trans people cannot have that same instinctual experience?

Also transwomen already compete with women in sports - see Renee Richards and Fallon Fox. Doctors have already come out and said transwomen on hormones do not have an unfair advantage in sports. Not only that there are several cis women who have had to go on hormones to compete because their natural hormonal makeup is too similar to a man's - see Dutee Chand. Please at least Google these things before putting them in a post.

Flipping this around, if we did bar trans people from using their respective changing rooms, what's to say a predatory cisgender man cannot walk into a womens changing room claiming to be a female-to-male transgender person? Many trans men look cisgender even when naked. Are you honestly telling me you'd be more threatened by a trans woman than an actual man getting changed in your changing room?

Kicking trans people out of their respective changing rooms is not going to make it easier for predators from entering the facility. They already prefer other ways of getting in there, as is shown by the number of predators sneaking into changing facilities already. If someone is acting creepy in a changing room, you call security. If they're just trying to change, leave them be.


_________________
call me cupid. please use they/them or he/his pronouns. be warned, i struggle to read all caps.


RoadRatt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2014
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 58,107
Location: Oregon

01 Jan 2016, 4:42 pm

Spiderpig wrote:
No, I don't, and it's not my responsibility to guess your point if you don't state it. Besides, someone living a hundred years ago would most likely say that you should know the argument works perfectly well and that noöne in their right mind would question that races have to be segregated.


Ah ok, I guess that is fair enough. What I mean by not being discrimination is this: The trans female has the same body as a cis male. Therefore if it's discrimination for the cis female to keep the trans female out then it is also discrimination for them to keep the cis male out. In this case, you're arguing that we might as well not have separate locker/rest rooms at all. Under this argument, I don't see how this could be considered discrimination in this case. (Also: I hope I got my terms correct. I'm still learning some of them. :P )

Spiderpig wrote:
How is it "my problem and noöne else's" if I'm uncomfortable changing clothes with people of my own sex, while it's "rightfully so" if others are uncomfortable doing it with someone of the opposite sex? Who gets to decide whose discomfort is worthy of enough respect to take measures to prevent it and whose isn't?


If you enter a room to change with members your own sex it's not their problem that you feel uncomfortable about it. If on the other hand you enter a room to change with members of the opposite sex and cause them to be uncomfortable, it is on you.


_________________
No power in the 'verse can stop me. - River Tam (Firefly)


btbnnyr
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 May 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,359
Location: Lost Angleles Carmen Santiago

01 Jan 2016, 5:50 pm

Girls who feel uncomfortable about trans person in the girls locker room should get their own locker room where they can feel comfortable.


_________________
Drain and plane and grain and blain your brain, and then again,
Propane and butane out of the gas main, your blain shall sustain!


League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,277
Location: Pacific Northwest

01 Jan 2016, 7:27 pm

btbnnyr wrote:
Girls who feel uncomfortable about trans person in the girls locker room should get their own locker room where they can feel comfortable.



or just change in the stall and thy wouldn't have to worry about the trans woman looking at them.


_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.

Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.


Yigeren
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,606
Location: United States

02 Jan 2016, 6:54 am

As I said, I don't want anyone to see me naked. And I don't want to see anyone else naked either.

I really, really don't want to see any naked people, so at least in that respect, there is no difference between my view of trans or non trans people.



RoadRatt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2014
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 58,107
Location: Oregon

02 Jan 2016, 4:53 pm

Spiderpig wrote:
We'd been separating races for quite a long time before we stopped doing so. Was that not discrimination, then? It's the way it had been all the life of anyone commenting on the situation back then, and farther back than that.


Sorry, it seems that in my last reply I mistook your case for discrimination with another one I'd seen posted in this thread.

In this argument for discrimination I'd have to say that it isn't the same as discriminating against black people. They were being discriminated against based solely on the color of their skin. For transgender people as a group it's not so "black and white", to coin a phrase. I'll agree that there are some people that would keep transgender people out based on their gender identity but that isn't the sole or even main reason for doing so in this case. To coin another phrase, "It's the elephant in the room" that is the biggest problem. When I say that, I mean it's what they can see with their eyes, which would be that transgender people are wearing the opposite body to the gender they identify as. In this case we now wrap back around for why keeping the body out isn't discrimination for which I stated in my last post.


_________________
No power in the 'verse can stop me. - River Tam (Firefly)


League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,277
Location: Pacific Northwest

02 Jan 2016, 8:18 pm

They are calling it discrimination because they are keeping a woman out of the women's locker or women's restroom because she has a guy's body. Most people view transgender as a desire to be a man or woman, not because they have a male or female brain and they ended up with one of each in their mother's womb while she was pregnant with them. Lot of us are born with male brains with male bodies or female brains with female bodies but for some reason that gets switched around in the mother's womb so the baby is born with one of each instead of one for both.


_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.

Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.