Quote:
There are probably a few sentences I would nit pick, just like some of you had. There was one where he refferred to aspergers as a "disease", which seems not only kind of demeaning like other terms, but probably not even medically accurate to begin with (anybody want to weigh in).I also didn't like the way he dotted his I's and crossed his T's, quite offensive. j/k
I suppose because Asperger's is mentioned in the article, that means it paints it in a negative light or whatever, but I really didn't think this particular case, considering the actual reality pertaining to it, was that bad.
Another point to realize is that my talking to him didn't seem to give that much information. All of the postings quoted were ones that they were able to find themselves, and, to be honest, I think this article tells a much better story than the kind of thing we've seen in the past with stories like this (e.g. "Oh, by the way, the killer had Aspergers!"). In a strange sense, the article portrays Freund in a kind of good light. I mean, this guy killed two (as far as we know) innocent people. It's good that they took a little time to go back and read some of the things he had said, try to understand the guy, go a bit deeper into the case.
I very much agree. The article was well written with compassion and respect. It is so good to see this type of reporting. It gives me hope.
_________________
Compressing the most words into the smallest ideas possible.
In times of universal deceit, telling the truth will be a revolutionary act. - George Orwell