psychohist wrote:
ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
All you need to do is look at the sentences one receives in cases of child abuse compared to cases where one stranger has assaulted another, both adults. Someone who harms an adult is given a harsher sentence, generally, than someone who has harmed a child, especially if the child is their own.
That's not a good comparison - child abuse is rarely perpetrated by strangers, and when it is, it's usually punished pretty harshly. A better comparison would be to spousal abuse, where the result is usually only a restraining order, not prosecution.
It is a good comparison. Look at capital murder cases. I cannot think of one person on death row in my state fore murdering a child yet this state ranks high for child abuse and child deaths.
What other reason is there?
Plus, I remember reading about how adults have more value in the eyes of the court. The older you are, the more value you have because of the life you have built for yourself, contributions you have made,relationships you have established.
Actually, in my home state of Washington, there was a guy executed for raping and murdering at least one child. I think his name was Wesley Allen Dodd, it was in the 1990's, and it had been the first execution in Washington after a number of years. He was also the last person in my state to die by hanging, since afterward, lethal injection became the sole means of execution. It was commonly felt he got exactly what he deserved.