EzraS wrote:
I find it interesting that some on twitter go on about how the virus will collapse our healthcare system if we don't take measures that will collapse our economy. As a situation 10 times worse than the great depression is going to save our healthcare system and keep people from dying.
And it seems it does not occur to any of them that instead of locking down the 95% who will experience a mild case, to save the 5% who will go critical, they need to quarantine the ones likey to go critical instead.
These vulnerable people who are critical and who have died. How did they get the virus? Why weren't they being kept in quarantine?
Well, we could have followed South Korea's example, which is a democratic country (not authoritarian, like some here have claimed). South Korea never implemented a lockdown. The key to South Korea's success was aggressive testing--including of young people--and aggressive contact-tracing, and quarantining those affected. That is definitely something to learn from here. We could have avoided having to do the shelter-in-place thing here had we done this early enough:
Quote:
Amid these dire trends, South Korea has emerged as a sign of hope and a model to emulate. The country of 50 million appears to have greatly slowed its epidemic; it reported only 74 new cases today, down from 909 at its peak on 29 February. And it has done so without locking down entire cities or taking some of the other authoritarian measures that helped China bring its epidemic under control. “South Korea is a democratic republic, we feel a lockdown is not a reasonable choice,” says Kim Woo-Joo, an infectious disease specialist at Korea University. South Korea’s success may hold lessons for other countries—and also a warning: Even after driving case numbers down, the country is braced for a resurgence.
Behind its success so far has been the most expansive and well-organized testing program in the world, combined with extensive efforts to isolate infected people and trace and quarantine their contacts. South Korea has tested more than 270,000 people, which amounts to more than 5200 tests per million inhabitants—more than any other country except tiny Bahrain, according to the Worldometer website. The United States has so far carried out 74 tests per 1 million inhabitants, data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention show.
South Korea’s experience shows that “diagnostic capacity at scale is key to epidemic control,” says Raina MacIntyre, an emerging infectious disease scholar at the University of New South Wales, Sydney. “Contact tracing is also very influential in epidemic control, as is case isolation,” she says.
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/03 ... ts-successNow this article was written almost a week ago, and expressed uncertainty over whether South Korea can hold this, but as you can see from the chart, South Korea has had very few new cases since, relatively speaking, and its growth rate of deaths is still slowing quite a bit.
Of course, being able to do this means probably investing for the long term in public health measures, even where you don't see short-term results. And in today's neoliberal environment in the West, that is a difficult proposition to sell.
_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin