Texas judge warns of possible ‘civil war’ if President Obama

Page 3 of 5 [ 72 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

GoonSquad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2007
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,748
Location: International House of Paincakes...

24 Aug 2012, 11:56 pm

Vigilans wrote:
AngelRho wrote:
But it IS a curse, and cursing anyone or anything shouldn't be something we can be so flippant about.


They need to burn those who wield curses at the stake like the good ol days


...and ban them from eBay.


_________________
No man is free who is not master of himself.~Epictetus


Inventor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,014
Location: New Orleans

26 Aug 2012, 5:00 pm

Lubbock makes Texas seem leftist.

In a hundred miles by a hundred miles, 10,000 square miles, there are less than 10,000 people.

The issue is raising taxes, and everyone is against that.

The threat of a UN invasion is very real after a few weeks spent in the West Texas Sun.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

26 Aug 2012, 5:02 pm

GoonSquad wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
AngelRho wrote:
But it IS a curse, and cursing anyone or anything shouldn't be something we can be so flippant about.

They need to burn those who wield curses at the stake like the good ol days

... and ban them from eBay.

Great idea! I'll get right on it...

:lol:



John_Browning
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,456
Location: The shooting range

26 Aug 2012, 5:39 pm

Inventor wrote:
Lubbock makes Texas seem leftist.

In a hundred miles by a hundred miles, 10,000 square miles, there are less than 10,000 people.

The issue is raising taxes, and everyone is against that.

The threat of a UN invasion is very real after a few weeks spent in the West Texas Sun.

If they do invade, you can expect them to go trophy hunting for blue helmets to mount alongside their deer heads. :twisted:


_________________
"Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars."
- Unknown

"A fear of weapons is a sign of ret*d sexual and emotional maturity."
-Sigmund Freud


Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,481
Location: Aux Arcs

26 Aug 2012, 6:26 pm

Can't we just give Tejas back to Mexico? After all it was theirs first.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,720
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

26 Aug 2012, 7:20 pm

Misslizard wrote:
Can't we just give Tejas back to Mexico? After all it was theirs first.


First transport Jim Hightower out of there, along with Robert E. Howard's body. Then I doubt the Republicans would ever win an election again.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



JWC
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2011
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 740
Location: Macondo Wellhead

28 Aug 2012, 12:13 pm

meems wrote:
JWC wrote:
meems wrote:
Oh hey, something I can add to my list of reasons I'm moving away from this horrible state.


Let me guess, you live in Dallas.

If Texas ever secedes, I hope we leave the Dallas/Ft. Worth area behind.


Nope. I've lived all over Texas and I have lived in Dallas, but probably less than four years of my life. I live in the Lake Texoma area now.

What made you guess Dallas? Also, why do so many Texans hate Dallas!?


I live in Houston. 'nuff said.



AngelRho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile

28 Aug 2012, 1:31 pm

John_Browning wrote:
Inventor wrote:
Lubbock makes Texas seem leftist.

In a hundred miles by a hundred miles, 10,000 square miles, there are less than 10,000 people.

The issue is raising taxes, and everyone is against that.

The threat of a UN invasion is very real after a few weeks spent in the West Texas Sun.

If they do invade, you can expect them to go trophy hunting for blue helmets to mount alongside their deer heads. :twisted:

Do you think they'd require a hunting license for that?



Oldout
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Feb 2012
Age: 74
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,539
Location: Reading, PA

29 Aug 2012, 9:03 am

No hunting license since that might be construed as a form of gun control.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,720
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

29 Aug 2012, 10:51 am

Oldout wrote:
No hunting license since that might be construed as a form of gun control.


:lol:

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

29 Aug 2012, 11:20 am

Oldout wrote:
No hunting license since that might be construed as a form of gun control.


Hunting Licenses regulate the kills, not the weapons. They apply to bow and arrow and cross-bow hunting as well.

ruveyn



AngelRho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile

29 Aug 2012, 1:29 pm

Oldout wrote:
No hunting license since that might be construed as a form of gun control.

Not gun control. Conservation. Most "gun nuts" I know generally still have a good sense of sportsmanship and respect for game. Quite a few "go hunting," which just means they sit in a tree all day and just happen to have a gun at their side. All these guys really want to do is get away from their wives for a day, unwind, and MAYBE see if there are any deer out in their favorite hunting spot. Often they won't kill the deer because they don't feel like going to the trouble of cleaning the carcass.

Animals that occur in high numbers, on the other hand, either aren't in danger of extinction or they actual pose an environmental hazard or are a nuisance. Where I grew up, it's illegal to trap beavers for collecting and selling pelts. It is NOT, however, illegal to set traps for the purpose of preventing floods in low-lying areas, particularly when creek flooding can potentially damage crops. UN soldiers would pose a unique threat to a newly emancipated nation: They can shoot back.



shrox
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,295
Location: OK let's go.

29 Aug 2012, 2:41 pm

Vigilans wrote:
...They need to burn those who wield curses at the stake like the good ol days


No, burn the steak, then undercook the potato. Make sure the iced tea has only one cube of ice in it.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

31 Aug 2012, 10:37 am

Vigilans wrote:
They need to burn those who wield curses at the stake like the good ol days


Why should those wield curses at the stake, be punished?

ruveyn



visagrunt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Vancouver, BC

31 Aug 2012, 11:20 am

ruveyn wrote:
Why should those wield curses at the stake, be punished?

ruveyn


Inner Yoda chanelling are you?


_________________
--James


Comp_Geek_573
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Sep 2011
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 699

31 Aug 2012, 2:05 pm

If Texas were to secede from the union, here's what its laws could actually look like:

- Stiff mandatory minimum sentences for all kinds of "crimes" including marijuana smoking - possibly even another attempt to ban alcohol
- The age of consent is raised to 21, most people start having sex at the age of 13, 10% of people are registered as sex offenders, and 99% of registered sex offenders in the state are registered for having sex with 18-20 year old boyfriends/girlfriends when they were 21-25.
- All prison is privatized and for-profit, and there is even more speculative prison building than there is now. Prison is motivated completely by getting more "business" (prisoners.)
- The kind of "laissez-faire" for corporations they had at the close of the 19th century
- Corporations are considered ABOVE people representation-wise
- Zero laws regarding how much one person, or a group of people, or a corporation, can give to polititicians or even flat-out say is contigent on voting for/against a particular bill. Basically, full-on legalized bribery.
- Zero gun laws. Anyone can just walk right into a gun shop and buy an AK-47 in 5 minutes. Then they'll wonder why there are so many shootings with those weapons...
- Abortion is illegal, even in cases of rape and incest. Both rape and incest will be rampant, but prosecutors will be more interested in getting the statutory, loving "rapists" to pump up their conviction numbers, thereby making actual rape all but legal.
- Employers can freely discriminate based on any disability, sexual orientation, gender and even race, and stores can refuse service to anyone for any or no reason. They'll be socialized into doing so even when it COSTS them money.

Here's what the majority of people could actually be like:
- Almost no moral compass - their "moral compass" will consist of blindly obeying the Bible, literally, and whatever laws they pass in the interest of huge corporations. Basically Asperger's-like rigid rule following, minus whether the rules actually make any sense.
- People will accept 50% unemployment, 0.1% of the people making 90% of the money and being fired for no reason (and branded for life with it) as "just the way it is." They'll even vote for it to continue!
- People will get behind tougher and tougher criminal statutes, not even realizing that they themselves routinely commit the "crimes" and could be next to go to prison.
- Racism, sexism and heterosexism are all socially acceptable.
- And worst of all, they'll have zero tolerance for anyone who learns at all differently than "most people" learn!! They'll see intelligence as one-dimensional.

That's about the extreme end of what I think could actually happen... I'm not claiming that Romney or even the current governor of Texas wants all that, but this could actually become politically possible there if Texas were its own country, free from the influence of the other 49 states... not to mention those a bit more sane are likely to "vote with their feet" and move to the remaining 49 united states of America.


_________________
Your Aspie score: 98 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 103 of 200
You seem to have both Aspie and neurotypical traits
AQ: 33