NY newspaper takes the gun control debate too far.
John_Browning wrote:
\
The problem is that the article was published a contribution to a series of claims that the people listed are a danger to the public, even though no such evidence exists.
The problem is that the article was published a contribution to a series of claims that the people listed are a danger to the public, even though no such evidence exists.
Do you have a scintilla of evidence to demonstrate that claim?
And even if you did--how does that give rise to a cause of action. If you are going to make claims about the legal rights of plaintiffs, you might want to start thinking like a lawyer.
_________________
--James
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Dating/love is possible but takes time IMO |
01 Jan 2025, 7:29 am |
Trump proposes U.S. control of Gaza |
Today, 6:44 pm |
Black Church gains control of Proud Boys trademark |
05 Feb 2025, 5:51 pm |